Rajput

Il Rajput (dal sanscrito raja-putra "Figli di re") è uno dei maggiori gruppi della casta guerriera induista kshatriya. Le loro origini sono legate al Rajputana, antico nome del Rajasthan, regione nord-occidentale dell'India, e si dicono appartenenti alla grande stirpe guerriera kshatriya. Famosi infatti per l'abilità e la cavalleria militare^[1], furono impiegati dall'esercito del governo coloniale inglese ed è facile trovarne dei membri anche al giorno d'oggi nelle Forze armate indiane.

Durante l'epoca medievale e tardo feudale/coloniale, diverse parti del subcontinente indiano vennero governate da stati principeschi di varie dinastie di Rajput. I Rajput divennero influenti politicamente dopo la disgregazione degli antichi imperi indiani a partire dal VII secolo in una regione nota come Rajasthan, Delhi, Haryana, Pianura indo-gangetica e Bundelkhand.^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11]

Ad ogni modo il termine "Rajput" è stato utilizzato come termine anacronistico per indicare le dinastie indù precedenti al XVI secolo in quanto non sono disponibili genealogie antecedenti a questo periodo.^[12]^[13]^[14]^[15]^[16]

Remove ads

I primi regni

I primi regni Rajput si datano verso la fine del VII secolo che sono durati fino al IX mentre alcuni fino all'XI secolo.

Le 4 famiglie Agnivanshi, che sono: i Parihara (del Pratihara), i Solanki (dei Chaulukya), i Paramara, e i Chahamana dei Chauhan, crebbero in importanza, stabilendosi sul territorio e creando i loro regni.

L'invasione islamica

Il Sultanato di Delhi fu fondato da Quṭb al-Dīn Aybak, all'inizio del XIII secolo.

Il Sultano ʿAlāʾ ud-Dīn II conquistò il Gujarat (1297), Malwa (1305), Ranthambore (nell'attuale Rajasthan) (1301), Chittorgarh (1303), Jalore, e Bhinmal (1311). Furono tutti conquistati dopo lunghi assedi e una forte resistenza dei difensori Rajput.

Epoca moghul

Il figlio di Bābur, Humāyūn, fu un regnante obbligato a passare lunghi periodi in esilio. Suo figlio Akbar, comunque consolidò la sua eredità ed espanse ciò che fu il Sultanato di Delhi in un vasto impero.

Parte della ragione del suo successo fu l'inclusione dei capi di origine Rajput nella classe governante del suo impero, grazie al suo matrimonio con una principessa della loro cultura e impose agli scribi di usare l'urdu, che contiene parole arabe, persiane e hindi.

Impero Maratha

Poiché l'autorità centrale dell'impero Moghul si disintegrò alla morte di Aurangzeb, il potere dei Maratti si consolidò sotto la guida di Shivaji (suo nonno Maloji Bhonsle, dichiarò di discendere dal clan Rajput Sisodia).

Remove ads

Le varie tribù o clan Rajput si suddividono in tre stirpi o dinastie, che identificano ciascuna una diversa origine divina dei loro membri: Suryavanshi, che rivendicano la discendenza da Surya, Chandravanshi, che rivendicano la discendenza da Chandra, e Agnivanshi, che rivendicano la discendenza da Agni.

Stirpe Suryavanshi

Bargujar
Bhatia
Bhutta
Chattar
Chundawat
Dogra
Gahlot
Ghorewaha
Gohil
Gora
Jaitawat
Jamwal
Jodhra
Kachwaha
Kirar
Katil
Mandahar
Minhas
Nagyal
Naru
Nathawat
Pundir
Ranawat
Rathore
Ror
Saharan
Sengar
Shaktawat
Sisodia
Thakial

Stirpe Chandravanshi

- Aheer
- Ahirs
- Ahirwar
- Alpial
- Bhatti
- Chadar
- Chadhar
- Chandela
- Chib
- Doad
- Gungal
- Harral
- Jadaun
- Jadeja
- Janjua
- Jarral
- Jaswal
- Jodhra
- Johiya
- Katoch
- Khakha
- Mahaar
- Mangral
- Manj
- Naipal
- Noon
- Ranial
- Saini
- Sulehria
- Tomaras
- Wattu
- Wejhwa
- Wijhalke
- Yadu

Stirpe Agnivanshi

- Baghial
- Bhakral
- Chauhan
- Deora
- Dor
- Gurjara-Pratihara
- Hon
- Kheechee
- Mori
- Narma
- Paramara
- Ponwar
- Rawat Rajputs
- Sial
- Solanki
- Sodha
- Vaghela
- Kharal
- Sohlan
- Panchal

Remove ads

Pratihara di Kannauj^[17]
Chauhan (di Sambhar, Nadol, Ranthambore e Jalor)
Tomara di Delhi
Chaulukya (Solankis) e Vaghela del Gujarat
Paramara di Malwa e Chandravati
Gahadavala di Varanasi e Kannauj
Chandela di Jejakabhukti (attuale Bundelkhand)
Guhila di Medapata (attuale Mewar)

[1]
(EN) James Tod, Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, or the Central and Western Rajput States of India, 2ª ed., Londra, Oxford University Press, 1920 [1873], SBN MIL0729612.
[2]
(EN) Hermann kulke, A History of India, Psychology Press, 2004, p. 116, ISBN 978-0-415-32920-0.
«"When Harsha shifted the centre of north India history to Kannauj in mids of Ganga-Jamuna doab the tribes living in the west of this new centre also became more important for further courses of Indian history. They were first and foremost the Rajputs who now emerged into limelight of Indian history"»
[3]
(EN) Sailendra Nath Sen, Ancient Indian History and Civilization, New Age International, 1999, p. 307, ISBN 978-81-224-1198-0.
«"The anarchy and confusion which followed the death of Harsha is a transitional period of history. This period was marked by the rise of the Rajput clans who began to play a conspicuous part in the history of northern and western India from eighth century A.D. onwards"»
[4]
(EN) Alain Danielou, A Brief History of India, Simon and Schuster, 2003, p. 87, ISBN 978-1-59477-794-3.
«"The Rajputs The rise of Rajputs in the history of northern and central India is considerable, as they dominated the scene between the death of Harsha and the establishment of the Muslim Empire"»
[5]
(EN) Brajadulal Chattopadhyaya, Studying Early India: Archaeology, Texts and Historical Issues, Anthem, 2006, p. 116, ISBN 978-1-84331-132-4.
«"The period between seventh and twelfth century witnessed gradual rise of a number of new royal-lineages in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh which came to constitute a social-political category known as Rajputs"»
[6]
(EN) Satish Chandra, Historiography, Religion, and State in Medieval India, Har-Anand Publications, 1996, p. 115, ISBN 978-81-241-0035-6.
«"In north India, dominant features of the period between 7th and 12th centuries have been identified as the growing weakness of state; the growth of power of local landed elittes and their decentralising authority by acquiring greater administrative, economic and political roles, the decline of towns, the setback to trades, This period between 7th to 12th century is also noted for rise of Rajputs»
[7]
(EN) Sara R. Farris, Max Weber's Theory of Personality: Individuation, Politics and Orientalism in the Sociology of Religion, BRILL, 5 settembre 2013, p. 145, ISBN 978-90-04-25409-1.
«"In about the eight century the Rajput thus began to perform the functions that had formerly belonged to the Kshatriya, assuming their social and economic position and substituting them as the new warrior class»
[8]
(EN) Eugenia Vanina, Medieval Indian Mindscapes: Space, Time, Society, Man, Primus Books, 2012, p. 140, ISBN 978-93-80607-19-1.
«"By the period of seventh–eights centuries AD when the first references to the Rajput clans and their chieftains were made"»
[9]
(EN) Peter Robb, A History of India, Macmillan International Higher Education, 21 giugno 2011, pp. 103, ISBN 978-0-230-34549-2.
«From around 1000 ce notable among these regional powers were various Rajput dynasties in the west and north»
[10]
Burton Stein, A History of India, a cura di Arnold, 2nd, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, p. 109.
«"The Rajput claim as a community were recorded in Sanskrit inscriptions that constituted as well as recorded in Rajasthan during the seventh century, when Rajputs begins to make themselves lords of various localities»
[11]
David Ludden, India and South Asia: A Short History, Oneworld Publications, 2013, pp. 88–, ISBN 978-1-78074-108-6.
«By contrast in Rajasthan a single warrior group evolved called Rajput (Rajaputra-son of kings), they rarely engaged in farming, even to supervise from labour as farming was literally benath them, farming was for their peasant subjects. In ninth century separate clans of Rajputs Cahamanas (Chauhans), Paramaras (Pawars), Guhilas (Sisodias) and Caulukyas were spitting off from Gurjara Pratihara clans.»
[12]
Norbert Peabody, Hindu Kingship and Polity in Precolonial India, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 38–, ISBN 978-0-521-46548-9.
«As Dirk Kolff has argued, it was privileged, if not initially inspired, only in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by Mughal perceptions of Rajputs which, in a pre-form of orientalism, took patrilineal descent as the basis for Rajput social Organization and consequently as the basis for their political inclusion into the empire. Prior to the Mughals, the term 'Rajput' was equally an open-ended, generic name applied to any ‘"horse soldier", "trooper", or "headman of a village"’ regardless of parentage, who achieved his status through his personal ability to establish a wide network of supporters through his bhaibandh (lit. 'ie or bond of brothers'; that is, close collateral relations by male blood) or by means of naukari (military service to a more powerful overlord) and sagai (alliance through marriage). Thus the language of kinship remained nonetheless strong in this alternative construction of Rajput identity but collateral and affinal bonds were stressed rather than those of descent. During the sixteenth and seventeenth cen-»
[13]
Peter Jackson, The Delhi Sultanate: A Political and Military History, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 9–, ISBN 978-0-521-54329-3.
«Confronting the Ghurid ruler now were a number of major Hindu powers, for which the designation 'Rajput' (not encountered in the Muslim sources before the sixteenth century) is a well-established anachronism. Chief among them was the Chahamana (Chawhan) kingdom of Shakambhari (Sambhar), which dominated present-day Rajasthan from its capital at Ajmer»
[14]
Susan Bayly, Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 39–, ISBN 978-0-521-79842-6.
«Yet the varna archetype of the Kshatriya-like man of prowess did become a key reference point for rulers and their subjects under the Mughals and their immediate successors. The chiefs and warriors whom the Mughals came to honour as Rajput lords in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries may not even have been descendants of Rajasthan's earlier pre-Mughal elites.»
[15]
Aditya Behl, Love's Subtle Magic: An Indian Islamic Literary Tradition, 1379-1545, a cura di Wendy Doniger, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 364–, ISBN 978-0-19-514670-7.
«The term Rajput is a retrospective invention, as most of the martial literature of resistance to Turkish conquest dates only from the mid-fifteenth century onward. As Dirk Kolff has noted in his Naukar, Rajput and Sepoy: The Ethnohistory of the Military Labour Market in Hindustan, 1450-1850 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), the invention of "Rajput" identity can be dated to the sixteenth-century narratives of nostalgia for lost honor and territory.»
[16]
Richard M. Eaton, India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765, Penguin UK, 25 luglio 2019, pp. 51–, ISBN 978-0-14-196655-7, OCLC 1088599361.
«Often projected back to the twelfth century or even earlier, the term 'Rajput' has been called a 'well-established anachronism»
[17]
Satish Chandra, Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals (1206–1526), vol. 1, Har-Anand Publications, 2006, p. 19, ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.
«"The middle of the tenth century saw the decay of two of the most powerful Rajput states which had dominated northern and central India during precedding centuries. These were Gurjara Pratihara Empire with their capital at Kannauj the first of the major Rajput kingdom"»

Remove ads

Wikimedia Commons contiene immagini o altri file su Rajput

rajput, in Dizionario di storia, Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana, 2010.

(EN) Rajput, su Enciclopedia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Ulteriori informazioni Controllo di autorità ...

Controllo di autorità	LCCN (EN) sh85111256 · GND (DE) 4271708-5 · BNF (FR) cb11948217w (data) · J9U (EN, HE) 987007563127105171

Chiudi

Portale India: accedi alle voci di Wikipedia che parlano dell'India

[1] [1]
(EN) James Tod, Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, or the Central and Western Rajput States of India, 2ª ed., Londra, Oxford University Press, 1920 [1873], SBN MIL0729612.

[2] [2]
(EN) Hermann kulke, A History of India, Psychology Press, 2004, p. 116, ISBN 978-0-415-32920-0.
«"When Harsha shifted the centre of north India history to Kannauj in mids of Ganga-Jamuna doab the tribes living in the west of this new centre also became more important for further courses of Indian history. They were first and foremost the Rajputs who now emerged into limelight of Indian history"»

[3] [3]
(EN) Sailendra Nath Sen, Ancient Indian History and Civilization, New Age International, 1999, p. 307, ISBN 978-81-224-1198-0.
«"The anarchy and confusion which followed the death of Harsha is a transitional period of history. This period was marked by the rise of the Rajput clans who began to play a conspicuous part in the history of northern and western India from eighth century A.D. onwards"»

[4] [4]
(EN) Alain Danielou, A Brief History of India, Simon and Schuster, 2003, p. 87, ISBN 978-1-59477-794-3.
«"The Rajputs The rise of Rajputs in the history of northern and central India is considerable, as they dominated the scene between the death of Harsha and the establishment of the Muslim Empire"»

[5] [5]
(EN) Brajadulal Chattopadhyaya, Studying Early India: Archaeology, Texts and Historical Issues, Anthem, 2006, p. 116, ISBN 978-1-84331-132-4.
«"The period between seventh and twelfth century witnessed gradual rise of a number of new royal-lineages in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh which came to constitute a social-political category known as Rajputs"»

[6] [6]
(EN) Satish Chandra, Historiography, Religion, and State in Medieval India, Har-Anand Publications, 1996, p. 115, ISBN 978-81-241-0035-6.
«"In north India, dominant features of the period between 7th and 12th centuries have been identified as the growing weakness of state; the growth of power of local landed elittes and their decentralising authority by acquiring greater administrative, economic and political roles, the decline of towns, the setback to trades, This period between 7th to 12th century is also noted for rise of Rajputs»

[7] [7]
(EN) Sara R. Farris, Max Weber's Theory of Personality: Individuation, Politics and Orientalism in the Sociology of Religion, BRILL, 5 settembre 2013, p. 145, ISBN 978-90-04-25409-1.
«"In about the eight century the Rajput thus began to perform the functions that had formerly belonged to the Kshatriya, assuming their social and economic position and substituting them as the new warrior class»

[8] [8]
(EN) Eugenia Vanina, Medieval Indian Mindscapes: Space, Time, Society, Man, Primus Books, 2012, p. 140, ISBN 978-93-80607-19-1.
«"By the period of seventh–eights centuries AD when the first references to the Rajput clans and their chieftains were made"»

[9] [9]
(EN) Peter Robb, A History of India, Macmillan International Higher Education, 21 giugno 2011, pp. 103, ISBN 978-0-230-34549-2.
«From around 1000 ce notable among these regional powers were various Rajput dynasties in the west and north»

[10] [10]
Burton Stein, A History of India, a cura di Arnold, 2nd, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, p. 109.
«"The Rajput claim as a community were recorded in Sanskrit inscriptions that constituted as well as recorded in Rajasthan during the seventh century, when Rajputs begins to make themselves lords of various localities»

[Ludden2013-11] [11]
David Ludden, India and South Asia: A Short History, Oneworld Publications, 2013, pp. 88–, ISBN 978-1-78074-108-6.
«By contrast in Rajasthan a single warrior group evolved called Rajput (Rajaputra-son of kings), they rarely engaged in farming, even to supervise from labour as farming was literally benath them, farming was for their peasant subjects. In ninth century separate clans of Rajputs Cahamanas (Chauhans), Paramaras (Pawars), Guhilas (Sisodias) and Caulukyas were spitting off from Gurjara Pratihara clans.»

[Peabody2003-12] [12]
Norbert Peabody, Hindu Kingship and Polity in Precolonial India, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 38–, ISBN 978-0-521-46548-9.
«As Dirk Kolff has argued, it was privileged, if not initially inspired, only in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by Mughal perceptions of Rajputs which, in a pre-form of orientalism, took patrilineal descent as the basis for Rajput social Organization and consequently as the basis for their political inclusion into the empire. Prior to the Mughals, the term 'Rajput' was equally an open-ended, generic name applied to any ‘"horse soldier", "trooper", or "headman of a village"’ regardless of parentage, who achieved his status through his personal ability to establish a wide network of supporters through his bhaibandh (lit. 'ie or bond of brothers'; that is, close collateral relations by male blood) or by means of naukari (military service to a more powerful overlord) and sagai (alliance through marriage). Thus the language of kinship remained nonetheless strong in this alternative construction of Rajput identity but collateral and affinal bonds were stressed rather than those of descent. During the sixteenth and seventeenth cen-»

[13] [13]
Peter Jackson, The Delhi Sultanate: A Political and Military History, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 9–, ISBN 978-0-521-54329-3.
«Confronting the Ghurid ruler now were a number of major Hindu powers, for which the designation 'Rajput' (not encountered in the Muslim sources before the sixteenth century) is a well-established anachronism. Chief among them was the Chahamana (Chawhan) kingdom of Shakambhari (Sambhar), which dominated present-day Rajasthan from its capital at Ajmer»

[Bayly2001-14] [14]
Susan Bayly, Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 39–, ISBN 978-0-521-79842-6.
«Yet the varna archetype of the Kshatriya-like man of prowess did become a key reference point for rulers and their subjects under the Mughals and their immediate successors. The chiefs and warriors whom the Mughals came to honour as Rajput lords in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries may not even have been descendants of Rajasthan's earlier pre-Mughal elites.»

[15] [15]
Aditya Behl, Love's Subtle Magic: An Indian Islamic Literary Tradition, 1379-1545, a cura di Wendy Doniger, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 364–, ISBN 978-0-19-514670-7.
«The term Rajput is a retrospective invention, as most of the martial literature of resistance to Turkish conquest dates only from the mid-fifteenth century onward. As Dirk Kolff has noted in his Naukar, Rajput and Sepoy: The Ethnohistory of the Military Labour Market in Hindustan, 1450-1850 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), the invention of "Rajput" identity can be dated to the sixteenth-century narratives of nostalgia for lost honor and territory.»

[Eaton2019-16] [16]
Richard M. Eaton, India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765, Penguin UK, 25 luglio 2019, pp. 51–, ISBN 978-0-14-196655-7, OCLC 1088599361.
«Often projected back to the twelfth century or even earlier, the term 'Rajput' has been called a 'well-established anachronism»

[17] [17]
Satish Chandra, Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals (1206–1526), vol. 1, Har-Anand Publications, 2006, p. 19, ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.
«"The middle of the tenth century saw the decay of two of the most powerful Rajput states which had dominated northern and central India during precedding centuries. These were Gurjara Pratihara Empire with their capital at Kannauj the first of the major Rajput kingdom"»

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

Rajput

I primi regni

L'invasione islamica

Epoca moghul

Impero Maratha

Stirpe Suryavanshi

Stirpe Chandravanshi

Stirpe Agnivanshi

Wikiwand in your browser!

Rajput

I primi regni

L'invasione islamica

Epoca moghul

Impero Maratha

Stirpe Suryavanshi

Stirpe Chandravanshi

Stirpe Agnivanshi

Wikiwand in your browser!

Storia

Le famiglie

Dinastie Rajput nel subcontinente indiano e loro stati

Note

Voci correlate

Altri progetti

Collegamenti esterni