Special pleading
Informal fallacy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein a person claims an exception to a general or universal principle, but the exception is unjustified.[1][2][3][4][5] It applies a double standard.[6][7]
In the classic distinction among material fallacies, cognitive fallacies, and formal fallacies, special pleading most likely falls within the category of cognitive fallacy, because it would seem to relate to "lip service", rationalization, and diversion (abandonment of discussion). Special pleading also often resembles the "appeal to" logical fallacies.[8][9]
In medieval philosophy, it was not presumed that wherever a distinction is claimed, a relevant basis for the distinction should exist and be substantiated. Special pleading subverts a presumption of existential import.[citation needed][further explanation needed]
Examples
A difficult case is when a possible criticism is made relatively immune to investigation. This immunity may take the forms of:
- Creation of an ad-hoc exception to prevent the rule from backfiring against the claim:
- Example: Everyone has a duty to help the police do their job, no matter who the suspect is. That is why we must support investigations into corruption in the police department. No person is above the law. Of course, if the police come knocking on my door to ask about my neighbors and the robberies in our building, I know nothing. I’m not about to rat on anybody.[5]
- "You aren't like me, so you do not even have a right to think about or hold opinions on my plight."[10]
- Example: Keep your advice to yourself. If you didn't grow up the way I did, then you can't understand.
Statistical
This variation occurs when the interpretation of the relevant statistic is "massaged" by looking for ways to reclassify or requantify data from one portion of results, but not applying the same scrutiny to other categories.[11]
See also
References
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.