Cetina culture

The Cetina culture is the name for the culture of the inhabitants of the Middle Dalmatian coast, and especially its hinterland, during the early Bronze Age (1900 to 1600 BC), or, according to Paul Reineck's chronology, Br A1 - A2/B1 (2200. – 1500 BC.).^[1] It is named after the numerous sites along the Cetina river in Central Dalmatia and Herzegovina. People of this culture were present in caves (Škarin Samograd near Drniš, Gudnja near Ston, Ravlić cave in Drinovci) or in open settlements (Gradac in Kotorac and Krstina near Posušje). The graves are in rocky colonies. In the case of inhumation, they have the shape of a stone chest, while incinerated remains of the deceased are laid in clay pots.

Cetina culture

Geographical range	West Balkans, Dalmatian coast
Period	Bronze Age Europe
Dates	c. 2300 BCE – 1600 BCE
Major sites	Cetina Valley
Preceded by	Vučedol culture, Bell Beaker culture
Followed by	Middle Helladic Greece, Castellieri culture, Glasinac-Mati culture

Heyd (2013) describes the early Cetina culture as a "syncretistic Bell Beaker culture", splitting off from the dissolving variant of the Vučedol complex, and at the same time incorporating elements of the Bell Beaker phenomenon.^[2]

Area of diffusion

The largest number of well-known sites of Cetina culture is located in the interior of Dalmatia, primarily between the upper stream of the Cetina river and the lower Neretva river. Individual finds are documented on Central Dalmatian islands, Palagruza, Northern Adriatic, deep in the interior of the Western Balkans, Albania, Southern and Eastern Italy, and Greece.

According to Heyd (2013) and Maran (1998), Cetina people from the Adriatic region migrated into southern Greece at the transition from Early Helladic II to III, c. 2200 BC. This explains the appearance of Bell Beaker artefacts in mainland Greece, Crete and the Aegean at this time.^[3] Kristiansen and Larsson (2005) suggest that migrants from both the Adriatic Cetina culture and the Danube area reached Greece in this period, the latter indicated by close similarities in pottery forms to the Mokrin and Nagyrev cultures. According to the authors there were "movements of groups of traders and some whole communities from east central Europe and the Balkans into Greece and the east Mediterranean at the close of the third millennium BC along already established routes of contact."^[4] Galaty et al. (2015) similarly argue that a 'warrior culture' including "ideas related to warrior aristocracy" spread from Europe to Greece through contact with the Cetina culture, along with the tradition of tumulus burial.^[5]

Settlements

Settlements are the least known aspect of Cetina culture. The most significant deposits of Cetina culture were discovered in the Škarin Samograd cave located at the foot of the Mogli brdo, six kilometers northwest of Unešić. The amount of findings collected in other researched settlements, mostly caves, suggests mainly temporary inhabitation. The stratigraphy of Škarin Samograd enabled Ivan Marovic and Borivoj Covic to produce a three-phase periodization of Cetina culture, which is still used.

Funeral Customs

The bearers of the Cetina culture buried their dead in tumuli usually made of large crushed stone, and only exceptionally of small stone or a mixture of stone and earth. The deceased were laid in a crouched position in a stone chest or their cremated remains were stored in a clay urn, most often placed in the center of the tumulus. In both burial methods, fragments of a large number (from two to as many as 67) of ceramic vessels were discovered in the stone layer of the tumulus, and it is possible that these are traces of the ritual breaking of dishes used during the posthumous feast. In addition to exclusively inhumation or cremation necropolises, there are also those where both funeral rites were used. Contributions in graves are very rare, and most often they are bronze weapons or jewelry. The ceramics found in the funerary context are generally of much lower quality than those from the settlement.

• 
  Cetina Culture tumuli stone cist graves
• 
  Cetina Culture tumuli stone cist graves

Genetics

The Mathieson et al. (2018) archaeogenetic study included two Early to Middle Bronze Age samples (1631-1521/1618-1513 calBCE) from Veliki Vanik, Dalmatia, Croatia (near Vrgorac). According to autosomal admixture analysis they had approximately 60% Early European Farmers, 33% Western Steppe Herders and 7% Western Hunter-Gatherer-related ancestry. The male individual from Veliki Vanik carried the Y-DNA haplogroup J2b2a1a1a1b2-Z38240 while his and the female's mtDNA haplogroup were I1a1, W3a1 respectively.^[6] Freilich et al. (2021) identify the Veliki Vanik samples as related to Cetina culture. They carry similar ancestry to a Copper Age sample from the site of Beli Manastir-Popova Zemlja (late Vučedol culture), eastern Croatia.^[7]

Systematic archaeological excavation of numerous prehistoric sites located around the source of the Cetina River were conducted between 1953 and 1968. All presented graves/skeletons are dated to the Early Bronze Age, i.e. the Cetina culture (ca 2200-1600 BCE). During the campaign carried out at the Rudine site in 1958 stone barrows 19 (T-19) and 21 (T-21) were completely excavated (among several others). T-19 was oval-shaped with a diameter of 17.1 m reaching in height up to 2.4 m. It contained four burials: three in graves and one in the stone deposit. Numerous pottery fragments were found in and around the barrow suggesting 116 some kind of ritual feasts. T-21 was also oval-shaped with a diameter of 13.6 m reaching in height up to 1.2 m. The tumulus contained a central grave in the shape of a stone chest. Nine stone barrows were completely excavated during the campaign conducted at the Preočani site including the Luića gomila or barrow 93 (T-93). This is an oval-shaped stone barrow with a diameter of 12.5 m reaching in height up to 1.1 m. The barrow contained one grave in the shape of a stone chest covered with a large square stone slab. The grave contained the remains of two individuals lying in crouched position with some bones belonging to the third individual moved out of the grave (primary skeleton). Three pottery fragments were found inside the grave.^[8] Lazaridis et al. (2022) examined these 18 samples from the Bronze Age Cetina Valley. Out of 10 males whose Y-DNA was successfully extracted, 9 belonged to haplogroup J2b (mainly J-L283 subclades) and 1 to haplogroup R-Z2118. The mtDNA haplogroups consisted of 2x H, H13a2a, H5, H6a1, 3x H6a1a, HV0e, 6x J1c1, N1a1a1, T1a1 and U5a1a.

Cetina Culture Archaeogenetic Samples

Sample ID	Age (BCE)	Site Location	Sex	Y-DNA (ISOGG)	Y-DNA (Yfull)	mtDNA (Yfull)
I4331	1631-1521 BCE	Veliki Vanik, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1a1a1b2~	J-Z38240	I1a1
I4332	1618-1513 BCE	Veliki Vanik, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	W3a1
I11843	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1a1a~	J-Z597	T1a1
I18088	2000-1600 BCE	Rudine, Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1	J-L283	H5
I18745	2000-1600 BCE	Preočani, Cetina Valley, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	HV0e
I18746	2000-1600 BCE	Rudine, Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1a1a1b2c~	J-Z38241	N1a1a1
I18747	2000-1600 BCE	Rudine, Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1a1a1b~	J-Y15058	U5a1a
I18752	2000-1600 BCE	Preočani, Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	R1b1a1b1a2	R-Z2118	H13a2a
I19016	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	H6a1
I19017	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	H6a1a
I19019	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	H6a1a
I19020	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	H6a1a
I19022	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	H
I19025	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1	J-L283	J1c1
I19026	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b	J-M102	J1c1
I19027	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Female	n/a (female)	n/a (female)	H
I19029	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1a~	J-Z600	J1c1
I19030	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	n/a (low coverage)	n/a (low coverage)	J1c1
I19031	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b	J-M102	J1c1
I19032	2000-1600 BCE	Cetina Valley, Croatia	Male	J2b2a1a1a1b~	J-Y15058	J1c1

^[6][8]

See also

• Illyrians

References

1. Harding, A. F. (2000). European Societies in the Bronze Age (PDF). Cambridge world archaeology. pp. 14–18. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 April 2015.
2. Heyd, Volker (2013). "Chapter 3. Europe 2500 to 2200 BC: Between expiring ideologies and emerging complexity". The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford University Press. pp. 47–67. ISBN 9780199572861.
3. Heyd, Volker (2013). "Chapter 3. Europe 2500 to 2200 BC: Between expiring ideologies and emerging complexity". The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford University Press. pp. 63–64. ISBN 9780199572861.
4. Kristiansen, Kristian; Larsson, Thomas B. (2005). The Rise of Bronze Age Society. Cambridge University Press. p. 120. ISBN 9780521843638.
5. Galaty, Michael; Tomas, Helen; Parkinson, William (2015). "9 - Bronze Age European Elites: From the Aegean to the Adriatic and Back Again". The Cambridge Prehistory of the Bronze and Iron Age Mediterranean. Cambridge University Press. pp. 157–177. doi:10.1017/CHO9781139028387.013. ISBN 9781139028387.
6. Mathieson I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Posth C, Szécsényi-Nagy A, Rohland N, Mallick S, et al. (March 2018). "The genomic history of southeastern Europe". Nature. 555 (7695): 197–203. Bibcode:2018Natur.555..197M. doi:10.1038/nature25778. PMC 6091220. PMID 29466330.
7. Freilich, Suzanne; Ringbauer, Harald; Los, Dženi; Novak, Mario; Tresić Pavičić, Dinko; Schiffels, Stephan (2021). "Reconstructing genetic histories and social organisation in Neolithic and Bronze Age Croatia". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 16729. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1116729F. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94932-9. PMC 8373892. PMID 34408163.
8. Lazaridis I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Acar A, Açıkkol A, Agelarakis A, Aghikyan L, Akyüz U, Andreeva D, Andrijašević G, Reich D, et al. (26 August 2022). "The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia and Europe". Science. 377 (6609): eabm4247. doi:10.1126/science.abm4247. PMC 10064553. PMID 36007055.

Bibliography

• Borivoj Čović: Od Butmira do Ilira, Sarajevo, 1976.
• Stašo Forenbaher - Timonthy Kaiser: Palagruža, jadranski moreplovci i njihova kamena industrija na prijelazu iz bakrenog u brončano doba, Opuscula archaeologica, 21, Zagreb, 1997, 15–28 https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/5438
• Blagoje Govedarica, Rano bronzano doba na području istočnog Jadrana, Sarajevo, 1989.
• Blagoje Govedarica: Keramika cetinskog tipa u unutrašnjosti zapadnog Balkana i problem kulturno-istorijske interpretacije praistorijskih nalaza, Godišnjak Centra za balkanološka ispitivanja Akademije nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 35, Sarajevo, 2006., str. 95-114 ^{[permanent dead link]}
• Nives Majnarić Pandžić: Brončano doba, u: Stojan Dimitrijević, Tihomila Težak-Gragl, Nives Majnarić Pandžić: Povijest umjetnosti u Hrvatskoj - Prapovijest, Zagreb, 1998., 159-219
• Joseph Maran - Seaborne Contacts between the Aegean, the Balkans and the Central Mediterranean in the 3rd Millennium BC; The Unfolding of the Mediterranean World, u I. Galanaki, H. Tomas, Y. Galanakis, and R. Laffineur (ur.), Between the Aegean and Baltic Seas: Prehistory across Borders (Aegaeum 27), Liège/Austin, 2007, str. 3-21
• Brunislav Marijanović: Cetinska kultura - rana faza, - samostalna kultura ili integralni dio eneolitika, Radovi Filozofskog fakulteta, Razdio povijesnih znanosti, Sv. 36/23 (1997.), Zadar, 1998.
• Ivan Marović: Prethistorijska istraživanja u okolici Narone, Dolina rijeke Neretve od prethistorije do ranog srednjeg vijeka, Izdanja Hrvatskog arheološkog društva, 5, 1980, str. 45-104
• Ivan Marović: Istraživanja kamenih gomila Cetinske kulture u srednjoj Dalmaciji, Vjesnik za historiju i arheologiju dalmatinsku, sv. 84, Split, 1991., str. 15-214
• Ivan Marović, Borivoj Čović: Cetinska kultura, Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja, IV, Sarajevo, 1983., str. 191-231
• Darko Periša: Prikaz – Stojan Dimitrijević, Tihomila Težak-Gregl, Nives Majnarić Pandžić: Prapovijest, Zagreb, 1998., Vjesnik za arheologiju i historiju dalmatinsku, 93, Split, 2001., 555-562
• Darko Periša: Brunislav Marijanović, Prilozi za prapovijest u zaleđu jadranske obale, Arheološki vestnik, 54, 2003., str. 422-438
• Ksenija Vinski-Gasparini: Litzen-keramima savsko-dravskog međurječja, Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja, IV, Sarajevo, 1983., 484-491
• Gori, Maja; Recchia, Giulia; Tomas, Helen (2018). "The Cetina phenomenon across the Adriatic during the 2nd half of the 3rd millennium BC: new data and research perspectives". 38° Convegno Nazionale Sulla Preistoria, Protostoria, Storia della Daunia.
• Forenbaher, Staso (2018). Special Place, Interesting Times: The island of Palagruža and transitional periods in Adriatic prehist. Archaeopress. ISBN 978-1-78491-850-7.