West Worcestershire (UK Parliament constituency)
Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1832–1885 & 1997 onwards From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
West Worcestershire is a constituency[n 1] in Worcestershire represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2010 by Harriett Baldwin, a Conservative.[n 2]
West Worcestershire | |
---|---|
County constituency for the House of Commons | |
![]() Boundaries since 2010 | |
![]() Boundary of West Worcestershire in West Midlands region | |
County | Worcestershire |
Electorate | 73,001 (December 2010)[1] |
Major settlements | Malvern, Pershore, Tenbury Wells and Upton-upon-Severn |
Current constituency | |
Created | 1997 |
Member of Parliament | Harriett Baldwin (Conservative) |
Seats | One |
Created from | South Worcestershire, Leominster |
1832–1885 | |
Seats | Two |
Type of constituency | County constituency |
Created from | Worcestershire |
Replaced by | Bewdley, Droitwich, Evesham, East Worcestershire and North Worcestershire |
The constituency first existed from 1832 to 1885, formally known as the Western Division of Worcestershire, electing two MPs.
The current constituency, created in 1997, is considered a safe seat for the Conservatives, having been a marginal with the Liberal Democrats from 1997 to 2010. The constituency boundaries roughly correspond with the Malvern Hills District.
Boundaries
Summarize
Perspective
1832–1885
The Petty Sessional Divisions of Upton, Worcester, Hundred House and Kidderminster, and the City and County of the City of Worcester.[2]
1997–2010
- The District of Malvern Hills wards of Baldwin, Broadheath, Chase, Hallow, Kempsey, Langland, Laugherne Hill, Leigh and Bransford, Link, Longdon, Martley, Morton, Powick, Priory, Ripple, Temeside, The Hanleys, Trinity, Upton-on-Severn, Wells, West, and Woodbury; and
- The District of Wychavon wards of Bredon, Eckington, Elmley Castle, Pershore Holy Cross, Pershore St Andrew's, Somerville, and South Bredon Hill.
2010–present
Under the Fifth periodic review of Westminster constituencies, the constituency was defined as comprising:
- The District of Malvern Hills; and
- the District of Wychavon wards of: Bredon, Eckington, Elmley Castle and Somerville, Pershore, and South Bredon Hill.
Boundary changes added an area including Tenbury Wells to the seat (formerly in the Leominster constituency) and transferred the small shared part of the Fladbury ward to the Mid Worcestershire seat.[3]
As a result of a local government boundary review in Wychavon,[4][5] which did not affect the parliamentary boundaries, the seat now comprises the following from May 2023:
- The District of Malvern Hills; and
- the District of Wychavon wards of: Bredon; Bredon Hill; Broadway, Sedgeberrow & Childswickham (small part); Eckington; Pershore;[6]
The 2023 Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies, which was based on the ward structure in place at 1 December 2020, left the boundaries unchanged.[7]
West Worcestershire stretches from the Gloucestershire border in the south almost to Shropshire in the north, taking in Pershore and Bredon Hill in its eastern side. Its other major towns are Malvern in the west and Upton-upon-Severn in the centre.
Constituency profile
The constituency boundaries roughly correspond with the Malvern Hills District. The seat is known for its hilly landscape: with products such as regional speciality cheeses, drinks and mineral water, a major economic sector is tourism and leisure. However, the principal industries are in agriculture; food; chemicals; distribution; waste and mineral processing; printing and publishing; and transport and retail.
Workless claimants who were registered jobseekers were in November 2012 significantly lower than the national average of 3.8%, at 2.1% of the population based on a statistical compilation by The Guardian.[8]
The seat was broadly in line with the UK average in the 2016 referendum on the UK's status with the EU, with an estimated 52 to 53% voting to Leave.[9]
History
Summarize
Perspective
1832–1885
West Worcestershire formally, the Western division of Worcestershire, was created the first time for the 1832 general election, by the Reform Act 1832 which radically changed the boundaries of many British parliamentary constituencies. It was created by the division of the old Worcestershire constituency (which had existed since 1290) into two new two-member constituencies: West Worcestershire and East Worcestershire.
During this first creation, three members of the Lygon family, the Earls Beauchamp (pronounced Beecham) represented the constituency – their large country estate in the county had its seat at Madresfield Court near the heart of Madresfield village.
The constituency then existed, basically unchanged, until its abolition by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 for the 1885 general election, when the constituency's territory was variously incorporated into the seats of Bewdley, Droitwich, Evesham, East Worcestershire and North Worcestershire.
1997–present
The seat was re-established for the 1997 general election on Parliament's approval of the Boundary Commission's fourth periodic review. It comprised the majority of the abolished constituency of South Worcestershire (excluding the town of Evesham), together with a small area transferred from Leominster.
- Political history
In the first four elections the seat (in this modern creation) alternated between Conservative majorities that were quite marginal (7.8% and 5.3%) and those that were greater than 10%, at 12% and 12.7%, close to average in terms of security for any of the three largest parties. As never having had a majority that exceeded 15% of the vote and having had two marginal majorities to date, the seat could not be classified as safe.
After the 2015 UK general election, this marginal profile between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats drastically changed after the Liberal Democrats' share of the vote fell markedly, leaving West Worcestershire as a safe Conservative seat since, with the Conservatives easily achieving 50% of the vote share each election. However, by the time of the 2024 general election, the Liberal Democrats had recovered to come within 12% of the Conservatives once again, after the latter's vote share slumped to 36.2%.
Members of Parliament
MPs 1832–1885
- Worcestershire West
Election | First member[10] | First party | Second member[10] | Second party | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1832 | Hon. Henry Lygon[n 3] | Tory[11] | Hon. Thomas Foley | Whig[11] | ||
1833 by-election | Henry Winnington | Whig[11][12] | ||||
1834 | Conservative[11] | |||||
1841 | Frederick Knight | Conservative[11] | ||||
1853 by-election | The Viscount Elmley[n 4] | Conservative | ||||
1863 by-election | Hon. Frederick Lygon | Conservative | ||||
1866 by-election | William Dowdeswell | Conservative | ||||
1876 by-election | Sir Edmund Lechmere, Bt | Conservative | ||||
1885 | constituency abolished |
MPs since 1997
South Worcestershire prior to 1997
Election | Member[10] | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1997 | Sir Michael Spicer | Conservative | |
2010 | Harriett Baldwin | Conservative |
Elections
Elections in the 2020s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Harriett Baldwin | 19,783 | 36.2 | −24.5 | |
Liberal Democrats | Dan Boatright | 13,236 | 24.2 | +6.1 | |
Labour | Kash Haroon | 8,335 | 15.2 | −1.3 | |
Reform UK | Christopher Edmondson | 7,902 | 14.4 | New | |
Green | Natalie McVey | 5,068 | 9.3 | +4.6 | |
Party of Women | Seonaid Barber | 363 | 0.7 | New | |
Majority | 6,547 | 12.0 | −30.6 | ||
Turnout | 54,687 | 69.0 | −6.1 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −15.3 |
Elections in the 2010s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Harriett Baldwin | 34,909 | 60.7 | −0.8 | |
Liberal Democrats | Beverley Nielsen | 10,410 | 18.1 | +8.7 | |
Labour | Samantha Charles | 9,496 | 16.5 | −7.2 | |
Green | Martin Allen | 2,715 | 4.7 | +1.9 | |
Majority | 24,499 | 42.6 | +4.8 | ||
Turnout | 57,530 | 75.4 | −0.5 | ||
Registered electors | 76,267 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Harriett Baldwin | 34,703 | 61.5 | +5.4 | |
Labour | Samantha Charles | 13,375 | 23.7 | +10.3 | |
Liberal Democrats | Edward McMillan-Scott | 5,307 | 9.4 | −0.3 | |
Green | Natalie McVey | 1,605 | 2.8 | −3.7 | |
UKIP | Mike Savage | 1,481 | 2.6 | −11.8 | |
Majority | 21,328 | 37.8 | −3.9 | ||
Turnout | 56,471 | 75.9 | +2.2 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Harriett Baldwin | 30,342 | 56.1 | +5.7 | |
UKIP | Richard Chamings[19] | 7,764 | 14.4 | +10.5 | |
Labour | Daniel Walton | 7,244 | 13.4 | +6.6 | |
Liberal Democrats | Dennis Wharton | 5,245 | 9.7 | −28.0 | |
Green | Julian Roskams | 3,505 | 6.5 | +5.3 | |
Majority | 22,578 | 41.7 | +29.0 | ||
Turnout | 54,100 | 73.7 | 0.0 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Harriett Baldwin | 27,213 | 50.4 | +5.4 | |
Liberal Democrats | Richard Burt | 20,459 | 37.7 | −1.2 | |
Labour | Penelope Barber | 3,661 | 6.8 | −3.7 | |
UKIP | Caroline Bovey | 2,119 | 3.9 | +0.7 | |
Green | Malcolm Victory | 641 | 1.2 | −1.2 | |
Majority | 6,754 | 12.7 | +6.7 | ||
Turnout | 53,993 | 73.7 | +3.7 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +3.3 |
Elections in the 2000s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Michael Spicer | 20,959 | 44.5 | −1.5 | |
Liberal Democrats | Tom Wells | 18,484 | 39.3 | +5.3 | |
Labour | Qamar Bhatti | 4,945 | 10.5 | −3.5 | |
UKIP | Caroline Bovey | 1,590 | 3.4 | −0.1 | |
Green | Malcolm Victory | 1,099 | 2.3 | −0.2 | |
Majority | 2,475 | 5.2 | −6.8 | ||
Turnout | 47,077 | 70.3 | +3.2 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −3.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Michael Spicer | 20,597 | 46.0 | +1.0 | |
Liberal Democrats | Michael Hadley | 15,223 | 34.0 | −3.2 | |
Labour | Waquar Azmi | 6,275 | 14.0 | −1.7 | |
UKIP | Ian Morris | 1,574 | 3.5 | New | |
Green | Malcolm Victory | 1,138 | 2.5 | +0.5 | |
Majority | 5,374 | 12.0 | +4.2 | ||
Turnout | 44,807 | 67.1 | −9.2 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1990s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Michael Spicer | 22,223 | 45.0 | ||
Liberal Democrats | Michael Hadley | 18,377 | 37.2 | ||
Labour | Neil Stone | 7,738 | 15.7 | ||
Green | Sue Cameron | 1,006 | 2.0 | ||
Majority | 3,846 | 7.8 | |||
Turnout | 49,344 | 76.3 | |||
Conservative win (new seat) |
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmund Lechmere | 2,975 | 41.8 | +0.3 | |
Conservative | Frederick Knight | 2,913 | 40.9 | +4.4 | |
Independent Liberal | Henry Richard Willis[26][27] | 1,231 | 17.3 | New | |
Majority | 1,682 | 23.6 | +9.1 | ||
Turnout | 4,175 (est) | 60.0 (est) | −9.2 | ||
Registered electors | 6,962 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmund Lechmere | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Caused by Dowdeswell's resignation.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Dowdeswell | 2,910 | 41.5 | N/A | |
Conservative | Frederick Knight | 2,554 | 36.5 | N/A | |
Liberal | George Hastings | 1,540 | 22.0 | New | |
Majority | 1,014 | 14.5 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,272 (est) | 69.2 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 6,177 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1860s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Dowdeswell | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Knight | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 6,311 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Dowdeswell | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Caused by Lygon's succession to the peerage, becoming 6th Earl Beauchamp.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Frederick Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Knight | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 5,221 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Frederick Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Caused by Lygon's succession to the peerage, becoming 5th Earl Beauchamp.
Elections in the 1850s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Knight | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 3,910 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Knight | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,015 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Caused by Lygon's succession to the peerage, becoming 4th Earl Beauchamp
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Knight | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,135 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Knight | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,357 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederick Knight | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,577 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Henry Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,654 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Lygon | 1,945 | 34.4 | ||
Whig | Henry Winnington | 1,938 | 34.3 | ||
Conservative | John Pakington | 1,773 | 31.3 | ||
Turnout | 3,617 | 87.6 | |||
Registered electors | 4,127 | ||||
Majority | 7 | 0.1 | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Majority | 165 | 3.0 | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Henry Winnington | 1,369 | 51.7 | ||
Tory | John Pakington | 1,278 | 48.3 | ||
Majority | 91 | 3.4 | |||
Turnout | 2,647 | 84.8 | |||
Registered electors | 3,122 | ||||
Whig hold |
- Caused by Foley's succession to the peerage, becoming 4th Baron Foley
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Lygon | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Thomas Foley | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 3,122 | ||||
Tory win (new seat) | |||||
Whig win (new seat) |
See also
Notes
- A county constituency (for the purposes of election expenses and type of returning officer)
- As with all constituencies, the constituency elects one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election at least every five years.
- Later Earl Beauchamp
- Viscount Elmley is a courtesy title given by the Earl Beauchamp to his eldest son, as his main subsidiary title.
References
Sources
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.