Brower, Kenneth S., 「A Propensity for Conflict: Potential Scenarios and Outcomes of War in the Middle East,」 Jane's Intelligence Review, Special Report no. 14, (February 1997), 14-15.
Nuking Gaza a possibility – Israeli minister. RT. 2023-11-05 [2023-11-07]. （原始內容存檔於2023-11-16）. Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu has suggested that his country could launch a nuclear strike on Gaza. The controversial remarks caused outrage across the Israeli government, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suspending Eliyahu indefinitely. During an interview on Sunday with Radio Kol Berama, Eliyahu, who is a member of the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, was asked if Israel could drop an atomic bomb on the Palestinian enclave. The minister replied that 「this is one of the possibilities.」[以色列文化遺產部長阿米哈伊·埃利亞胡表示，以色列可能對加薩走廊發動核打擊。這一有爭議的言論激起了以色列政府的憤怒，以色列總理使阿米哈伊·埃利亞胡班傑明·納坦雅胡無限期停職。以色列總理內塔尼亞胡21日在接受巴勒斯坦廣播電台記者採訪時說，以色列是否可以在巴勒斯坦領土上投放原子彈。部長回答說: 「這是可能性之一。]
Nes Ziyyona. GlobalSecurity.org. April 28, 2005 [2007-02-11]. （原始內容存檔於2007-02-16）. Israel is believed to have the capacity to produce chemical warfare agents, and probably has stocks of bombs, rockets, and artillery shells. Public reports that a mustard and nerve gas production facility was established in 1982 in the Dimona restricted area are apparently erroneous. Israel is also probably poised to rapidly produce biological weapons, though there are no public reports of currently active production effort or associated locations.…Israel's primary chemical and biological warfare facility is at Nes Ziyyona [Noss Ziona], near Tel Aviv. The Israeli Institute for Bio-Technology is believed to be the home of both offensive and defensive research.
Normark, Magnus; Anders Lindblad; Anders Norqvist; Björn Sandström; Louise Waldenström. Israel and WMD: Incentives and Capabilities(PDF). FOI: 38. December 2005 [2007-02-11]. （原始內容(PDF)存檔於2007-02-08）. Israel does not stockpile or produce BW in large-scale today. However, we assess that Israel has a breakout capability for biological weapons and also CW, i.e. the knowledge needed to implement theoretical knowledge into the practical management of production and deployment of CBW. The knowledge base would be the one that was built during the 1950s and 1960s where today’s advanced research can be used to upgrade potential BW and CW agents and their behaviour in the environment. We have not found any conclusive evidence that show that Israel’s offensive programs still remain active today.
The Bomb That Never Is, by Avner Cohen, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2000, Vol 56, No. 3 pp. 22–23
Israel and the Bomb[2]（頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館） (Columbia University press, 1998), including declassified documents.
Obsessive secrecy undermines democracy（頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館） By Reuven Pedatzur Ha'aretz. Tuesday, August 8, 2000—Cohen published "Israel and the Bomb" in the United States, and a Hebrew translation of the book has appeared here. In the eyes of the defense establishment, Cohen has committed a double sin.
Fighting to preserve the tattered veil of secrecy（頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館） By Ronen Bergman The publication of Dr. Avner Cohen's book and of the Vanunu trial transcripts set off alarm bells for the Defense Ministry's chief of security, who is striving to protect the traditional opacity regarding Israel's nuclear affairs.
Blast, from the past to the present（頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館） By Yirmiyahu Yovel Ha'aretz. 28 July 2000—If, in the context of the peace agreements and talks with the United States, Israel were to confirm its nuclear capability - while committing itself to no nuclear testing and pledging to build its defense system on conventional weapons as in the past - maybe then it might achieve at least de facto recognition, if not international legitimacy, for its nuclear weaponry, to be used only as a "last resort" and a tool for safeguarding peace after Israel withdraws.
