閃語族

閃語族
閃語族
敘利亞-阿拉伯語族
地理分佈	西亞、北非、非洲之角、馬爾他
譜系學分類	亞非語系閃語族;
原始語言	原始閃語
分支	東閃語支 † 西閃語支
語言代碼
ISO 639-2 / 5	sem
	–
Glottolog	semi1276
	; 閃語言的大致歷史分布

閃語族，譯作閃語族、塞姆語族或閃米特語族 ，舊稱敘利亞-阿拉伯語族^[2]，是亞非語系之下的語族之一，起源於中東地區^[3]^[4]，其下屬語言約有3.3億人作為母語，分布於西亞、北非和非洲之角，也有亞非語系僑民生活於歐洲和北美，或高加索和中亞。

Quick Facts 閃語族, 地理分佈 ...

Close

閃語族由哥廷根歷史學校的成員於18世紀命名，「閃」一詞來源於希伯來聖經創世記，是挪亞的三個兒子之一，相傳是希伯來人和亞述人的祖先^[5]。

現代所使用的其分支語言有阿拉伯語^[6]、希伯來語^[7]、亞蘭語^[8]^[9]^[10]、阿姆哈拉語^[11]、提格里尼亞語^[12]、提格雷語和馬爾他語^[13]等。閃語族中使用人數最多的語言是現代標準阿拉伯語，而如果包括所有阿拉伯語變體的母語人口在內，阿拉伯語共有3.1億人作為母語，廣泛分布在西亞、北非和東非地區^[14]。

閃語族下屬語言在詞法學上有一個被稱為「不連續形態」的顯著特徵，即詞彙的詞根並不是獨立的音節或單詞，而是多個互相分離的輔音（通常為三個），藉由相應的元音將分離的輔音詞根聯繫起來而組成新詞。例如，阿拉伯語中的k-t-b是與「寫」相關的詞根形式，用這個詞根組成的詞彙有كتاب‎ kitāb（書的單數），كتب‎ kutub（書的複數）、كاتب‎ kātib（作家的單數）和كتّاب‎ kuttāb（作家的複數）等。

東閃語支
- 阿卡德語（古代語言，已消亡）(akk)
- 埃卜拉語（古代語言，已消亡）(xeb)
中閃語支
- 亞蘭語
  - 古亞蘭語 (oar)
  - 亞蘭語 (arc)
  - Armazic (xrm)
  - 東部
    - 中部
      - 東北部
        Assyrian Neo-Aramaic (aii)
        
        Lishanid Noshan (aij)
        
        Bohtan Neo-Aramaic (bhn)
        
        Barzani Jewish Neo-Aramaic (bjf)
        
        Chaldean Neo-Aramaic (cld)
        
        Hértevin (hrt)
        
        Hulaulá (huy)
        
        Koy Sanjaq Surat (kqd)
        
        Lishana Deni (lsd)
        
        Senaya (syn)
        
        Jewish Babylonian Aramaic (tmr)
        
        Lishán Didán (trg)
      - 西北部
        Mlahsö (lhs)
      - 圖羅尤語 (tru)
    - 曼達語
      - 曼達語 (mid)
      - 古典曼達語 (myz)
    - 古典敘利亞語 (syc)
  - 西部
    - Jewish Palestinian Aramaic (jpa)
    - 西部現代亞拉姆語 (amw)
    - 薩馬利亞亞蘭語 (sam)
- 南部
  - 阿拉伯語 (ara)
    - 古代北阿拉比亞語 (xna)
    - 安達盧西亞阿拉伯語（在西班牙，Andalusian Arabic）(xaa)
    - 阿爾及利亞撒哈拉口語 (aao)
    - 塔吉克口語 (abh)
    - Arabic, Baharna Spoken (abv)
    - 美索不達米亞口語 (acm)
    - Arabic, Ta'izzi-Adeni Spoken (acq)
    - 希賈茲口語Arabic, Hijazi Spoken (acw)
    - 阿曼口語Arabic, Omani Spoken (acx)
    - 賽普勒斯口語Arabic, Cypriot Spoken (acy)
    - Arabic, Dhofari Spoken (adf)
    - 突尼斯口語 (aeb)
    - Arabic, Sa`idi Spoken (aec)
    - 波斯灣口語 (afb)
    - 南黎凡特口語 (ajp)
    - 猶太-突尼斯口語Arabic, Judeo-Tunisian (ajt)
    - 猶太-摩洛哥口語Arabic, Judeo-Moroccan (aju)
    - 北黎凡特口語 (apc)
    - 蘇丹口語 (apd)
    - 標準阿拉伯語 (arb)
    - 阿爾及利亞口語 (arq)
    - 納季德口語 (ars)
    - 摩洛哥口語 (ary)
    - 埃及口語 (arz)
    - 烏茲別克口語 (auz)
    - Arabic, Eastern Egyptian Bedawi Spoken (avl)
    - Arabic, Hadrami Spoken (ayh)
    - 利比亞口語 (ayl)
    - 薩那口語 (ayn)
    - 北美索不達米亞口語 (ayp)
    - 猶太-葉門口語Arabic, Judeo-Yemeni (jye)
    - Hassaniyya (mey)
    - 馬爾他語 (mlt)
    - 查德口語Arabic, Chadian Spoken (shu)
    - Arabic, Shihhi Spoken (ssh)
    - 猶太-伊拉克口語Arabic, Judeo-Iraqi (yhd)
    - Arabic, Judeo-Tripolitanian (yud)
  - 迦南語言
    - 亞捫語（Ammonite，古代語言）(aoq，參看The Linguist List)
    - 埃多姆語（古代語言）(xdm)
    - 古希伯來語 (hbo)
    - 摩押語（古代語言）(obm)
    - 腓尼基語（古代語言）(phn)
    - 布匿語（古代語言）(xpu)
    - 撒馬利亞語（已消亡）(smp)
    - 烏加里特語（古代語言）(uga)
    - 希伯來語 (heb)
- 未分類
  - 底雅亞拉語（Deir Alla，古代語言）(xdr，參看The Linguist List （頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館）)
南閃語支
- 衣索比亞語言
  - 北部
    - 吉茲語 (gez)
    - 提格雷語 (tig)
    - 提格里尼亞語、提格利尼亞語 (tir)
  - 南部
    - 外部 Outer
      - n-Group
        Gafat (gft)
        
        Kistane (gru)
      - tt-Group
        Inor (ior)
        
        Mesqan (mvz)
        
        Mesmes (mys)
        
        Sebat Bet Gurage (sgw)
    - 橫斷線 Transversal
      - Amharic-Argobba
        Argobba (agj)
        
        阿姆哈拉語 (amh)
      - 哈勒爾-東部古拉格 Harari-East Gurage
        哈勒爾語 (har)
        
        Silt'e (stv)
        
        Wolane (wle)
        
        Zay (zwa)
- 南阿拉伯語言
  - Bathari (bhm)
  - 哈德拉毛語（Hadrami，已消亡）(xhd)
  - Harami（已消亡）(xha)
  - Mehri (gdq)
  - Hobyót (hoh)
  - Harsusi (hss)
  - 密尼安語（Minaean，已消亡）(inm)
  - Qatabanian（已消亡）(xqt)
  - 賽伯伊語（Sabaean，已消亡）(xsa)
  - Shehri (shv)
  - 索科特拉語（Soqotri）(sqt)

[1]
Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian (編). Semitic. Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 2016.
[2]
Kitto, John. A Cyclopædia of Biblical Literature. London: W. Clowes and Sons. 1845: 192. That important family of languages, of which the Arabic is the most cultivated and most widely-extended branch, has long wanted an appropriate common name. The term Oriental languages, which was exclusively applied to it from the time of Jerome down to the end of the last century, and which is even now not entirely abandoned, must always have been an unscientific one, inasmuch as the countries in which these languages prevailed are only the east in respect to Europe; and when Sanskrit, Chinese, and other idioms of the remoter East were brought within the reach of our research, it became palpably incorrect. Under a sense of this impropriety, Eichhorn（英語：Johann Gottfried Eichhorn） was the first, as he says himself (Allg. Bibl. Biblioth. vi. 772), to introduce the name Semitic languages, which was soon generally adopted, and which is the most usual one at the present day. [...] In modern times, however, the very appropriate designation Syro-Arabian languages has been proposed by Dr. Prichard（英語：James Cowles Prichard）, in his Physical History of Man. This term, [...] has the advantage of forming an exact counterpart to the name by which the only other great family of languages with which we are likely to bring the Syro-Arabian into relations of contrast or accordance, is now universally known—the Indo-Germanic. Like it, by taking up only the two extreme members of a whole sisterhood according to their geographical position when in their native seats, it embraces all the intermediate branches under a common band; and, like it, it constitutes a name which is not only at once intelligible, but one which in itself conveys a notion of that affinity between the sister dialects, which it is one of the objects of comparative philology to demonstrate and to apply.
[3]
Bennett, Patrick R. Comparative Semitic Linguistics: A Manual. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. 1998.
[4]
Hetzron, Robert. The Semitic Languages. London/New York: Routledge. 1997.
[5]
Baasten, Martin. A Note on the History of 'Semitic'. Hamlet on a Hill: Semitic and Greek Studies Presented to Professor T. Muraoka on the Occasion of His Sixty-fifth Birthday. Peeters Publishers. 2003: 57–73 [2018-07-26]. ISBN 9789042912151. （原始內容存檔於2019-12-07）.
[6]
Jonathan, Owens. The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Oxford University Press. 2013: 2 [18 February 2014]. ISBN 0199344094. （原始內容存檔於2019-06-01）.
[7]
Modern Hebrew於《民族語》的連結（第18版，2015年）
[8]
^ Jump up to: a b Assyrian Neo-Aramaic at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
[9]
Chaldean Neo-Aramaic at Ethnologue (14th ed., 2000).
[10]
^ Turoyo at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
[11]
Amharic於《民族語》的連結（第18版，2015年）
[12]
Tigrinya於《民族語》的連結（第18版，2015年）
[13]
Ethnologue Entry for Maltese, 21st ed., 2018. [2018-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2021-01-26）.
[14]
Arabic. ethnologue.com. [14 April 2018]. （原始內容存檔於2016-01-05）.

http://www.ethnologue.com/show_family.asp?subid=89998 （頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館）

[Glottolog-1] [1]
Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian (編). Semitic. Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 2016.

[JK-2] [2]
Kitto, John. A Cyclopædia of Biblical Literature. London: W. Clowes and Sons. 1845: 192. That important family of languages, of which the Arabic is the most cultivated and most widely-extended branch, has long wanted an appropriate common name. The term Oriental languages, which was exclusively applied to it from the time of Jerome down to the end of the last century, and which is even now not entirely abandoned, must always have been an unscientific one, inasmuch as the countries in which these languages prevailed are only the east in respect to Europe; and when Sanskrit, Chinese, and other idioms of the remoter East were brought within the reach of our research, it became palpably incorrect. Under a sense of this impropriety, Eichhorn（英語：Johann Gottfried Eichhorn） was the first, as he says himself (Allg. Bibl. Biblioth. vi. 772), to introduce the name Semitic languages, which was soon generally adopted, and which is the most usual one at the present day. [...] In modern times, however, the very appropriate designation Syro-Arabian languages has been proposed by Dr. Prichard（英語：James Cowles Prichard）, in his Physical History of Man. This term, [...] has the advantage of forming an exact counterpart to the name by which the only other great family of languages with which we are likely to bring the Syro-Arabian into relations of contrast or accordance, is now universally known—the Indo-Germanic. Like it, by taking up only the two extreme members of a whole sisterhood according to their geographical position when in their native seats, it embraces all the intermediate branches under a common band; and, like it, it constitutes a name which is not only at once intelligible, but one which in itself conveys a notion of that affinity between the sister dialects, which it is one of the objects of comparative philology to demonstrate and to apply.

[3] [3]
Bennett, Patrick R. Comparative Semitic Linguistics: A Manual. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. 1998.

[4] [4]
Hetzron, Robert. The Semitic Languages. London/New York: Routledge. 1997.

[5] [5]
Baasten, Martin. A Note on the History of 'Semitic'. Hamlet on a Hill: Semitic and Greek Studies Presented to Professor T. Muraoka on the Occasion of His Sixty-fifth Birthday. Peeters Publishers. 2003: 57–73 [2018-07-26]. ISBN 9789042912151. （原始內容存檔於2019-12-07）.

[Owens300-6] [6]
Jonathan, Owens. The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Oxford University Press. 2013: 2 [18 February 2014]. ISBN 0199344094. （原始內容存檔於2019-06-01）.

[7] [7]
Modern Hebrew於《民族語》的連結（第18版，2015年）

[8] [8]
^ Jump up to: a b Assyrian Neo-Aramaic at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)

[9] [9]
Chaldean Neo-Aramaic at Ethnologue (14th ed., 2000).

[10] [10]
^ Turoyo at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)

[11] [11]
Amharic於《民族語》的連結（第18版，2015年）

[12] [12]
Tigrinya於《民族語》的連結（第18版，2015年）

[13] [13]
Ethnologue Entry for Maltese, 21st ed., 2018. [2018-07-26]. （原始內容存檔於2021-01-26）.

[14] [14]
Arabic. ethnologue.com. [14 April 2018]. （原始內容存檔於2016-01-05）.

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

Wikiwand in your browser!

閃語族

Wikiwand in your browser!

分支

參考文獻

外部連結