戴蒙德訴查克拉巴蒂案（Diamond v. Chakrabarty），447 U.S. 303 (1980)是美國聯邦最高法院判決的一個案件，裁定轉基因生物可被授予專利[1]。
| 戴蒙德訴查克拉巴蒂案 Diamond v. Chakrabarty | |
|---|---|
 | |
| 辯論：19803月17日 判決：19806月16日 | |
| 案件全名 | Sidney A. Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, v. Ananda M. Chakrabarty, et al. |
| 引註案號 | 447 U.S. 303 100 S. Ct. 2204; 65 L. Ed. 2d 144; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 112; 206 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 193 |
| 既往案件 | Application of Bergy, 596 F.2d 952 (C.C.P.A. 1979); cert. granted, 444 U.S. 924 (1979) |
| 法庭判決 | |
| Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a "manufacture" or "composition of matter" within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability. Decision of the Court of Customs & Patent Appeals affirmed. | |
| 法庭意見 | |
| 多數意見 | 伯格 聯名：Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens |
| 不同意見 | 布倫南 聯名：White, Marshall, Powell |
| 適用法條 | |
| Patent Act of 1952, specifically 35 U.S.C. § 101 | |
參考資料
外部連結
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
