Stephen L. Harris (). Understanding the Bible. Mayfield. p.388. ISBN978-1-55934-083-0. Most scholars believe that 1 Peter is pseudonymous (written anonymously in the name of a well-known figure) and was produced during postapostolic times.
Keener, Craig S. (). 1 Peter: A Commentary. Baker Publishing Group. p.unpaginated. ISBN978-1-4934-2931-8. Accesat în . Here I venture to a somewhat contrarian opinion, while aware that many colleagues whom I esteem highly do not share it.
Charles, Daryl; Thatcher, Tom; Longman, Tremper; Garland, David E. (). 1 and 2 Peter, 1, 2, and 3 John, Jude. The Expositor's Bible Commentary. Zondervan Academic. p.unpaginated. ISBN978-0-310-53209-5. Accesat în . Despite the overwhelming consensus of biblical scholarship in rejecting Petrine authorship [...]
Matera, Frank J. (). New Testament Theology: Exploring Diversity and Unity. Presbyterian Publishing Corporation. p.373. ISBN978-0-664-23044-9. Accesat în . In recent years, however, the emerging consensus is that the letter had its origin in a Petrine circle that revered the teaching and memory of Peter.2
Laine Hamilton, Stephanie (). „Peter (d. mid-60s CE)”. În Hendrix, Scott E.; Okeja, Uchenna. The World's Greatest Religious Leaders: How Religious Figures Helped Shape World History [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p.526. ISBN978-1-4408-4138-5. Accesat în . However, authentic Petrine authorship is widely disputed, with most scholars agreeing that Peter likely did not actually write either of the letters named for him in the New Testament—especially II Peter.
Holman Bible Publishers (). „1 Peter”. KJV Apologetics Study Bible (în engleză). B&H Publishing Group. p.unpaginated. ISBN978-1-5359-3476-3. Accesat în . Almost all non-evangelical scholars claim Peter did not write the letter, and some who identify themselves as evangelicals agree.
Craddock, Fred B. (). „Introduction to First Peter”. First and Second Peter, and Jude. Westminster Bible companion. Presbyterian Publishing Corporation. p.13. ISBN978-0-664-25265-6. Accesat în . Arguing for or against Petrine authorship has lost its importance for most students of this letter.