فهرست اشغال‌های نظامی

این مقاله، فهرستی از اشغال‌های نظامی، از زمانی‌که قوانین عرفی اشغال نظامی متخاصم برای اولین بار توسط کنوانسیون لاهه در سال ۱۹۰۷ روشن و تکمیل شد، اعم از تاریخی و کنونی را ارائه می‌کند.^[۱]

همان‌طور که در حال حاضر در حقوق بین‌الملل فهمیده می‌شود، اشغال نظامی عبارت است از کنترل نظامی مؤثر توسط یک قدرت بر سرزمینی خارج از قلمروی مستقل شناخته‌شده آن قدرت. قدرت اشغالگر مورد بحث، ممکن است یک دولت یا یک سازمان فراملی مانند سازمان ملل باشد.

اشغال‌های کنونی

اشغال‌های نظامی در حال حاضر و قدرت‌های اشغالگر

	قلمرو	آغاز اشغال	کشور یا قلمروی اشغال‌شده	کشور اشغالگر	کشور یا قلمروی اعلام‌شده توسط اشغالگر	وضعیت
	ترانس‌نیستریا	۱۹۹۲	مولدووا	روسیه	ترانس‌نیستریا	اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی[الف]
	آبخاز	۲۰۰۸	گرجستان		آبخاز	اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی[۲][ب]
	اوستیای جنوبی				اوستیای جنوبی
	کریمه[۳][۴]	۲۰۱۴	اوکراین[پ]		ناحیه‌های فدرال روسیه  جمهوری کریمه  سواستوپول	اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی با الحاق[۲]
	بخش‌های مهمی از استان‌های دونتسک، خرسون، لوهانسک و زاپوریژیا بخش کمی از استان‌های خارکوف و میکولائیف	۲۰۱۴[ت] ۲۰۲۲[ث]			ناحیه‌های فدرال روسیه[ج]  جمهوری خلق دونتسک[چ] استان خرسون شبه‌جزیره کینبرن بیرونی (استان میکولائیف)  جمهوری خلق لوهانسک[ح] استان زاپوریژیا اطراف تاویلژانکا (استان خارکوف)	استان‌های دونتسک، خرسون، لوهانسک، زاپوریژیا: جمهوری‌های خلق دونتسک و لوهانسک: اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی (۲۰۱۴–۲۰۲۲)[۲][۵] چهار استان: اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی با الحاق (۲۰۲۲) روسیه، کل منطقه را ضمیمه کرده حتی بخش‌هایی که تحت کنترلش نیست.[خ] استان میکولائیف: اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی با الحاق جزئی؛ سرزمینی که عمدتاً از نوامبر ۲۰۲۲ توسط اوکراین پس گرفته شد.[د] استان خارکوف: اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی[ذ]
	بخشی‌هایی از استان کورسک	۲۰۲۴	روسیه[ر]	اوکراین	استان کورسک تحت اشغال اوکراین	اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی[۱۲][ز]
	اورشلیم شرقی[۱۳][۱۴][۱۵][۱۶]	۱۹۶۷	سرزمین‌های فلسطینی؛  فلسطین (از زمان بیانیه استقلال فلسطین در ۱۹۸۸)[ژ]	اسرائیل	بخشی از منطقه اورشلیم (ضمیمه‌شده به‌طور مؤثر در ۱۹۸۰)	اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی با الحاق[۲][۲۱][س]
	کرانه باختری[۲۲]				منطقه یهودا و سامره	اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی،[۲۳][ش] با الحاق جزئی دفاکتو در کرانه باختری[۲]
	نوار غزه[ص]				—
	بلندی‌های جولان[۲۷][۲۸][۲۹]		سوریه		بخشی از منطقه شمالی (ضمیمه‌شده به‌طور مؤثر در ۱۹۸۱)
	التنف[۳۱]	۲۰۱۵		ایالات متحده آمریکا	—	اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی[۳۱][ط]
	مناطق اعزاز، الباب و جرابلس[۳۲][۳۳]	۲۰۱۶		ترکیه	دولت موقت سوریه	اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی[ظ]
	منطقه عفرین	۲۰۱۸				اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی[۳۴][ع]
	مناطق تل البیض و راس‌العین	۲۰۱۹				اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی[غ]
	قبرس شمالی[۳۵]	۱۹۷۴	قبرس		قبرس شمالی	اشغال توسط گروهی مسلح تحت نفوذ قدرتی خارجی[۲][۵][ف]
	سوفولو، برخوردارلی، اسکی‌پاره بالا و کرک[۳۶]	۱۹۹۲	جمهوری آذربایجان	ارمنستان	بخشی از استان‌های تاووش و آرارات	اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی
	آرتسواشن[۳۷]		ارمنستان	جمهوری آذربایجان	بخشی از شهرستان گدابیگ
	بیشتر صحرای غربی[۳۸]	۱۹۷۵	جمهوری دموکراتیک عربی صحرا (اعلام‌شده در ۱۹۷۶)	مراکش	استان‌های جنوبی (الحاق‌شده بین ۱۹۷۶–۱۹۷۹)	اشغال توسط قدرتی خارجی با الحاق[۲][۲۱][ق]

جستارهای وابسته

• سرزمین‌های تحت اشغال روسیه
• سرزمین‌های اشغال‌شده توسط اسرائیل
• صلح‌بانی
• ضمیمه کردن به خاک
• انتقام‌گرایی
• فهرست کشورهای با رسمیت محدود

کتاب‌شناسی

• دبیرخانه پارلمان اروپا DG-EXPO (۲۰۱۵), اشغال/الحاق یک قلمرو: احترام به حقوق بشردوستانه بین‌المللی و حقوق بشر و سیاست منسجم اتحادیه اروپا (PDF)

منابع

1. "Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907". Archived from the original on 1999-02-25. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
2. Duval, A.; Kassoti, E. (2020). The Legality of Economic Activities in Occupied Territories: International, EU Law and Business and Human Rights Perspectives. Routledge Research in International Economic Law. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-00-008873-1. In the West Bank, Israel pays lip service to the notion of a temporary occupation that is to be brought to an end by negotiation but in practice it has de facto annexed large portions of the territory under the pretext of security – as evidenced by the Wall in Palestinian territory – or by the settling of some 400,000 of its own citizens in the territory. In most cases today, however, the occupying power has formally annexed the territory in question. This is illustrated by the cases of Israel's annexations of East Jerusalem and the Golan, Morocco's annexation of Western Sahara and Russia's annexation of the Crimea. Alternatively, the occupying power has established a puppet regime that claims to be the TRNC, Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
3. Peter Bursens; Christ'l De Landtsheer; Luc Braeckmans; Barbara Segaert, eds. (2016). Complex Political Decision-Making: Leadership, Legitimacy and Communication. Taylor & Francis. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-315-45352-1.
4. Geiß, Robin (2015). "Russia's Annexation of Crimea: The Mills of International Law Grind Slowly but They Do Grind". International Law Studies. the Stockton Center for the Study of International Law. 91. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
5. (Secretariat of the European Parliament DG-EXPO 2015، ص. 15): "Territory may further be controlled by an armed group. This could be a rebel group which wants to take over control of the government of the state in question or it could be a group that wants to secede from the state and form a new state or have the territory transferred to another state. [...] There is no term in international law for such territory. [...] In some cases, the armed group in power in such a territory may be under the control of or under the influence of a foreign power. As has been held by the European Court of Human Rights, Turkey is legally responsible for human rights violations committed in the non-recognised 'Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus' (TRNC). It is possible that the situation is similar in the self-proclaimed peoples' republics in Donetsk and Lugansk."
6. "Russian-held parts of Ukraine's Mykolaiv region to be incorporated in Russian-held Kherson". Reuters. 21 September 2022. Retrieved 21 September 2022.
7. Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 [@bayraktar_1love] (10 November 2022). "Snihurivka, Mykolaiv oblast - liberated 10/11/2022 t.co/eZSRD5c3uV" (Tweet) (به انگلیسی). Archived from the original on 15 November 2022. Retrieved 13 December 2022 – via Twitter.
8. "Russia-Ukraine war live: Kyiv sceptical of Moscow's retreat from Kherson; US general estimates 100,000 Russian military casualties". the Guardian (به انگلیسی). 2022-11-10. Retrieved 2022-11-10.
9. "Ukraine liberates all of Mykolaiv Oblast, Zelenskyy admin considers slashing ministries".
10. ТРУХА⚡️English [@TpyxaNews] (11 November 2022). "The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has published a map where the entire Western bank of the Kherson region is no longer occupied by Russians t.co/K6CM40k9Tx" (Tweet) (به انگلیسی). Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 13 December 2022 – via Twitter.
11. ТРУХА⚡️English [@TpyxaNews] (12 November 2022). "The Kinburn peninsula, or as it is also called, the Kinburn Spit, remains the only not yet liberated territory in the Mykolaiv region, is the goal of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, "combat work is underway" on this occasion, - Natalia Humeniuk In addition, she promised good news🤞 t.co/6MhK3yHLO8" (Tweet) (به انگلیسی). Archived from the original on 14 November 2022. Retrieved 13 December 2022 – via Twitter.
12. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-opens-military-office-occupied-kursk-region-says-it-is-still-advancing-2024-08-15/ ^{[bare URL]}
13. "Israel plans 1,300 East Jerusalem Jewish settler homes". BBC News. 9 November 2010. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
14. "Chapter 12: The status of Jerusalem" (PDF). The Question of Palestine & the United Nations (Brochure). United Nations Department of Public Information. March 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2003-09-02.
15. "Israeli authorities back 600 new East Jerusalem homes". BBC News. 26 February 2010. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
16. "United Nations Security Council Resolution 298 (1971) of 25 September 1971". Archived from the original on 2013-08-19.
17. See also: Jordanian annexation of the West Bank
18. See also: Egyptian occupation of the Gaza Strip
19. "Palestinian territories - Timeline". BBC News. 8 July 2015. Retrieved November 30, 2015.
20. "Amid violence, 'glaring lack of hope,' UN deputy chief urges action to break Israeli-Palestinian impasse". UN News. 23 November 2015. Archived from the original on 26 November 2015. Retrieved November 30, 2015.
21. (Secretariat of the European Parliament DG-EXPO 2015، ص. 14): "An occupied territory may also be illegally annexed [...] Annexation means that the territory is incorporated into another state and is being regarded by that state as a part of its territory. Among contemporary examples, one finds the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, Western Sahara and Crimea. Under current international law, annexation can only be carried out after a peace treaty, and preferably after a referendum. Annexations which do not correspond to this requirement – like those just mentioned – are illegal."
22. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (PDF) (Advisory opinion). Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders. International Court of Justice. 2004. ISBN 92-1-070993-4. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
23. (Secretariat of the European Parliament DG-EXPO 2015، ص. 14): "Territory over which a foreign power has taken control is occupied. [...] An occupation is supposed to be a temporary status, but current reality shows that territory may be occupied for decades; the West Bank and Gaza have been occupied for 48 years."
24. "Daily Press Briefing by the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General". United Nations. 19 January 2012. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
25. • Sanger, Andrew (2011). M.N. Schmitt; Louise Arimatsu; Tim McCormack (eds.). "The Contemporary Law of Blockade and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla". Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2010. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. Springer Science & Business Media. 13: 429. doi:10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_14. ISBN 978-90-6704-811-8. Israel claims it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, maintaining that it is neither a Stale nor a territory occupied or controlled by Israel, but rather it has 'sui generis' status. Pursuant to the Disengagement Plan, Israel dismantled all military institutions and settlements in Gaza and there is no longer a permanent Israeli military or civilian presence in the territory. However the Plan also provided that Israel will guard and monitor the external land perimeter of the Gaza Strip, will continue to maintain exclusive authority in Gaza air space, and will continue to exercise security activity in the sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip as well as maintaining an Israeli military presence on the Egyptian-Gaza border. and reserving the right to reenter Gaza at will.
      Israel continues to control six of Gaza's seven land crossings, its maritime borders and airspace and the movement of goods and persons in and out of the territory. Egypt controls one of Gaza's land crossings. Troops from the Israeli Defence Force regularly enter pans of the territory and/or deploy missile attacks, drones and sonic bombs into Gaza. Israel has declared a no-go buffer zone that stretches deep into Gaza: if Gazans enter this zone they are shot on sight. Gaza is also dependent on Israel for water, electricity, telecommunications and other utilities, currency, issuing IDs, and permits to enter and leave the territory. Israel also has sole control of the Palestinian Population Registry through which the Israeli Army regulates who is classified as a Palestinian and who is a Gazan or West Banker. Since 2000 aside from a limited number of exceptions Israel has refused to add people to the Palestinian Population Registry.
      It is this direct external control over Gaza and indirect control over life within Gaza that has led the United Nations, the UN General Assembly, the UN Fact Finding Mission to Gaza, International human rights organisations, US Government websites, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office and a significant number of legal commentators, to reject the argument that Gaza is no longer occupied.
    • Scobbie, Iain (2012). Elizabeth Wilmshurst (ed.). International Law and the Classification of Conflicts. Oxford University Press. p. 295. ISBN 978-0-19-965775-9. Even after the accession to power of Hamas, Israel's claim that it no longer occupies Gaza has not been accepted by UN bodies, most States, nor the majority of academic commentators because of its exclusive control of its border with Gaza and crossing points including the effective control it exerted over the Rafah crossing until at least May 2011, its control of Gaza's maritime zones and airspace which constitute what Aronson terms the 'security envelope' around Gaza, as well as its ability to intervene forcibly at will in Gaza.
    • Gawerc, Michelle (2012). Prefiguring Peace: Israeli–Palestinian Peacebuilding Partnerships. Lexington Books. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-7391-6610-9. While Israel withdrew from the immediate territory, Israel still controlled all access to and from Gaza through the border crossings, as well as through the coastline and the airspace. In addition, Gaza was dependent upon Israel for water, electricity, sewage, communication networks, and for its trade (Gisha 2007. Dowty 2008). ln other words, while Israel maintained that its occupation of Gaza ended with its unilateral disengagement, Palestinians—as well as many human right organizations and international bodies—argued that Gaza was by all intents and purposes still occupied.
26. Slater, Jerome (October 2012). "Just War Moral Philosophy and the 2008–09 Israeli Campaign in Gaza" (PDF). International Security. 37 (2): 44–80. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00098. S2CID 57565733. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 اكتبر 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-11. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |archive-date= (help)
27. • "The international community maintains that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan is null and void and without international legal effect." International Labour Office (2009). The Situation of Workers of the Occupied Arab Territories. Geneva: International Labour Office. p. 23. ISBN 978-92-2-120630-9.
    • In 2008, a plenary session of the United Nations General Assembly voted by 161–1 in favour of a motion on the "occupied Syrian Golan" that reaffirmed support for UN Resolution 497. ("General Assembly adopts broad range of texts, 26 in all, on recommendation of its fourth Committee, including on decolonization, information, Palestine refugees" (Press release). United Nations. 5 December 2008.)
    • "[...] the Golan Heights, a 450-square mile portion of southwestern Syria that Israel occupied during the 1967 Arab–Israeli war." Also, "[...] the Syrian Golan Heights territory, which Israel has occupied since 1967". (Prados, Alfred B. (19 January 2006). "CRS Issue Brief for Congress: Syria: U.S. Relations and Bilateral Issues" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. pp. 3, 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-03-23.)
28. Occupied territory:

    • "[...] Israeli-occupied Golan Heights [...]" (Central Intelligence Agency (2009). CIA World Factbook 2010. Skyhorse Publishing Inc. p. 339. ISBN 978-1-60239-727-9. OCCUPIED GOLAN.)
    • "[...] the United States considers the Golan Heights to be occupied territory subject to negotiation and Israeli withdrawal [...]" (Mark, Clyde R. (5 April 2002). "CRS Issue Brief for Congress: Israeli-United States Relations" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2003-04-24.)
    • "[...] Occupied Golan Heights." ("Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories travel advice". UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 5 August 2010. Archived from the original on 11 August 2010.)
    • "In the ICRC's view, the Golan is an occupied territory [...]" ("ICRC activities in the occupied Golan during 2007". International Committee of the Red Cross. 24 April 2008. Archived from the original on 2011-11-13.)
29. Korman, Sharon (1996). The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Oxford University Press. p. 265. ISBN 0-19-828007-6. The continued occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights is recognized by many states as valid and consistent with the provisions of the United Nations Charter, on a self-defence basis. Israel, on this view, would be entitled to exact as a condition of withdrawal from the territory the imposition of security measures of an indefinite character—such as perpetual demilitarization, or the emplacement of a United Nations force—which would ensure, or tend to ensure, that the territory would not be used against it for aggression on future occasions. But the notion that Israel is entitled to claim any status other than that of belligerent occupant in the territory which it occupies, or to act beyond the strict bounds laid down in the Fourth Geneva Convention, has been universally rejected by the international community—no less by the United States than by any other state.
30. "Trump signs decree recognizing Israeli sovereignty over Golan Heights". Reuters. 25 March 2019. Archived from the original on 25 March 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
31. "Syria vows to fight against 'occupiers' US, Turkey, Israel". Middle East Monitor. 20 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
32. Kajjo, Sirwan (2 March 2017). "Skirmishes Mar Fight Against IS in Northern Syria". Voice of America. Turkish occupation "is an existential threat to the Assad government's ability to reclaim the entirety of its territory, which is a key argument that regime loyalists make in their support of Bashar al-Assad's government," Heras said.
33. Fisk, Robert (29 March 2017). "In northern Syria, defeated Isis fighters leave behind only scorched earth, trenches – and a crucifixion stand". The Independent. You can't mistake the front line between the Syrian army and Turkey's occupation force east of Aleppo.
34. "Afrin's Syrian Kurds Continue to Pay Price of Turkey's Occupation". The Defense Post. 15 September 2021.
35. UN Security Council resolutions 353, 357, 358, 359, 360, and 365.
36. "Armenian-Azerbaijani Disputes Beyond Karabakh". University of Southern California. August 9, 2017. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
37. Institute for War and Peace Reporting (February 12, 2011). "Cold Comfort for Displaced Armenian Villagers". Refworld. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
38. "Military occupation of Western Sahara by Morocco". Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts. Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Retrieved 2019-10-11.

یادداشت‌ها

1. Seized during the Transnistria War; administered as the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, a state with limited international recognition.
2. Seized during the Russo-Georgian War; administered as states with limited international recognition.
3. رجوع کنید به جنگ روسیه و اوکراین، جنگ در دونباس و حمله روسیه به اوکراین.
4. The occupation of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts occurred in two stages. The south of Luhansk Oblast and the southeast of Donetsk Oblast were occupied by Russian-backed separatists from 2014 to 2022. Later, in 2022, the north of Luhansk Oblast (i.e. almost the entire oblast) and the southwest of Donetsk Oblast (e.g. Mariupol) came under Russian occupation. Parts of the northeast of Donetsk Oblast were also occupied, but areas such as Lyman have been retaken by Ukraine as of October ۲۰۲۲.
5. Russia's occupation of Kherson Oblast (nearly the entire oblast) and Zaporizhzhia Oblast (only the southern portion) began in 2022. On the other hand, Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts were initially partially occupied by Russian-backed separatists back in 2014. In 2022, larger areas of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts came under Russian occupation, and the Russian-backed separatists handed over absolute control to Russia, effectively designating the entire area as Russian-occupied (as opposed to separatists-occupied). In Zaporizhzhia Oblast, Russia lacks control of the capital city, Zaporizhzhia, but controls the second-biggest city, Melitopol, which is acting as the de facto capital. Parts of the northwest of Kherson Oblast have been retaken by Ukraine as of October ۲۰۲۲.
6. See Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine and Russian annexation of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts.
7. See Russian occupation of Donetsk Oblast.
8. See Russian occupation of Luhansk Oblast.
9. As of November 2022, Russia does not control significant portions of Kherson Oblast, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, and Donetsk Oblast. In particular, Russia does not control the capital cities of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts, namely Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, respectively. Russia formerly controlled Kherson for over eight months throughout 2022 after capturing it in the Battle of Kherson, although the city was eventually liberated by Ukraine following the successful 2022 Ukrainian southern counteroffensive on 10–11 November 2022. Russia never managed to occupy the city of Zaporizhzhia at any point. Meanwhile, Russia has never managed to occupy a significant portion of Donetsk Oblast in the northwest, although Russia does control the capital city, Donetsk. As for Luhansk Oblast, Russia controls nearly the entire oblast as of November 2022.
10. Russia occupied territory in the southeast of Mykolaiv Oblast during the 2022 invasion. After failing to occupy the capital city, Mykolaiv, Russian forces withdrew to the extreme southeast, near the border with Kherson Oblast. On 30 September 2022, when Russia annexed Kherson Oblast, Russia also streamlined two small parts of Mykolaiv Oblast into Kherson Oblast, namely the city of Snihurivka and its surroundings,^[۶] as well as the outer portion of the Kinburn Peninsula. As of 10 November 2022, the city of Snihurivka^[۷][۸] and its surroundings^[۹][۱۰] have been completely liberated following the successful 2022 Ukrainian southern counteroffensive, although the outer Kinburn Peninsula is still under Russian occupation.^[۱۱]
11. As of November 2022, only a tiny sliver of Kharkiv Oblast in the far northeast is still occupied by Russian forces.
13. Seized in the August 2024 Kursk Oblast incursion; as of August 2024 Ukraine claims occupation encompasses 82 settlements near Russian-Ukrainian border, the largest being Sudzha.
14. از سال ۱۹۴۸ تا ۱۹۶۷، کرانه باختری (از جمله اورشلیم شرقی) توسط اردن^[۱۷] و نوار غزه توسط مصر تحت اشغال بودند^[۱۸] اما از سال ۱۹۶۷ توسط اسرائیل اشغال شده‌اند.^[۱۹] دولت فلسطین که مدعی این سرزمین‌ها است، تا سال ۱۹۸۸ تأسیس نشد (به بیانیه استقلال فلسطین مراجعه کنید). دولت فلسطین، از نوامبر ۲۰۱۵، توسط ۱۳۶ کشور به‌رسمیت شناخته شده‌است و همچنین یکی از ناظران غیرعضو سازمان ملل متحد است.^[۲۰]
15. Seized during the Six-Day War from Jordan; effectively annexed in 1980 via the Jerusalem Law.
16. The West Bank was seized during the Six-Day War from Jordan, and is administered by the Israeli Civil Administration. The Oslo II Accord, officially signed on 28 September 1995, divided the West Bank into the Area C administered by Israel and the Area A and B administered by the Palestinian National Authority.
    
    The Gaza Strip was seized during the Six-Day War from Egypt. In 2005, Israel disengaged its military forces from the strip and no longer considers itself to be occupying the territory. Gaza's border crossings with Israel and maritime and air space are controlled by Israel. As of 2012, the United Nations "continue to refer to the Gaza Strip as part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory until such time as either the General Assembly or the Security Council take a different view."^[۲۴]
17. Still considered occupied despite the 2005 Israeli disengagement from Gaza.^[۲۵] The system of control imposed by Israel has been described as an "indirect occupation".^[۲۶] Some other legal scholars have disputed the idea that Israel still occupies Gaza.^{[نیازمند منبع]}
18. Seized during the Six-Day War; effectively annexed in 1981 via the Golan Heights Law. Lebanon also claims the Shebaa farms and sees the territory as being under Israeli occupation.
19. مداخله آمریکا در جنگ داخلی سوریه را ببینید.
20. See Turkish military intervention in Syria and Syrian Civil War.
21. See Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war and Kurdish–Turkish conflict (2015–present).
22. See Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war and Kurdish–Turkish conflict (2015–present).
23. Seized during the Turkish invasion of Cyprus; administered as the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, a state with limited international recognition
24. Seized during the Western Sahara War; de facto annexed; administered as the Southern Provinces; claimed by the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, a state with limited international recognition.