Zeta potential

Zeta potential is the electrical potential at the slipping plane. This plane is the interface which separates mobile fluid from fluid that remains attached to the surface.

Diagram showing the ionic concentration and potential difference as a function of distance from the charged surface of a particle suspended in a dispersion medium

Zeta potential is a scientific term for electrokinetic potential^[1][2] in colloidal dispersions. In the colloidal chemistry literature, it is usually denoted using the Greek letter zeta (ζ), hence ζ-potential. The usual units are volts (V) or, more commonly, millivolts (mV). From a theoretical viewpoint, the zeta potential is the electric potential in the interfacial double layer (DL) at the location of the slipping plane relative to a point in the bulk fluid away from the interface. In other words, zeta potential is the potential difference between the dispersion medium and the stationary layer of fluid attached to the dispersed particle.

The zeta potential is caused by the net electrical charge contained within the region bounded by the slipping plane, and also depends on the location of that plane. Thus, it is widely used for quantification of the magnitude of the charge. However, zeta potential is not equal to the Stern potential or electric surface potential in the double layer,^[3][4][5][6] because these are defined at different locations. Such assumptions of equality should be applied with caution. Nevertheless, zeta potential is often the only available path for characterization of double-layer properties.

The zeta potential is an important and readily measurable indicator of the stability of colloidal dispersions. The magnitude of the zeta potential indicates the degree of electrostatic repulsion between adjacent, similarly charged particles in a dispersion. For molecules and particles that are small enough, a high zeta potential will confer stability, i.e., the solution or dispersion will resist aggregation. When the potential is small, attractive forces may exceed this repulsion and the dispersion may break and flocculate. So, colloids with high zeta potential (negative or positive) are electrically stabilized while colloids with low zeta potentials tend to coagulate or flocculate as outlined in the table.^[7]

[A] pH-dependant ionisation of a weak acid [HA] and its conjugated base [A-] drawn using Henderson-Hasselbalch equation; [B] Ionisation and solubility of a pH-responsive polymer as a function of pH [C] A schematic showing the potential difference as a function of distance from the charged surface of a particle in a medium; [D] Dissolution mechanism of pH-responsive polymers reproduced with permission from. The encircled numbers in [D] represent (1) Diffusion of water and hydroxyl ions into the polymer matrix to form a gel layer, (2) Ionization of polymer chains in the gel layer, (3) Disentanglement of polymer chains out of the gel layer to the polymer-solution interface, (4) Further ionization of polymer chains at the polymer interface, (5) Diffusion of disentangled polymer chains away from the interface toward the bulk solution.^[8]

Zeta potential can also be used for the pKa estimation of complex polymers that is otherwise difficult to measure accurately using conventional methods. This can help studying the ionisation behaviour of various synthetic and natural polymers under various conditions and can help in establishing standardised dissolution-pH thresholds for pH responsive polymers.^[8]

Stability behaviour of a colloid depending on zeta potential^[9]

Magnitude of Zeta potential (mV)	Stability behavior
0 to 5	Rapid coagulation or flocculation
10 to 30	Incipient instability
30 to 40	Moderate stability
40 to 60	Good stability
>61	Excellent stability

Measurement

Some new instrumentations techniques exist that allow zeta potential to be measured. The Zeta Potential Analyzer can measure solid, fibers, or powdered material. The motor found in the instrument creates an oscillating flow of electrolyte solution through the sample. Several sensors in the instrument monitor other factors, so the software attached is able to do calculations to find the zeta potential. Temperature, pH, conductivity, pressure, and streaming potential are all measured in the instrument for this reason.

Zeta potential can also be calculated using theoretical models, and an experimentally-determined electrophoretic mobility or dynamic electrophoretic mobility.

Electrokinetic phenomena and electroacoustic phenomena are the usual sources of data for calculation of zeta potential. (See Zeta potential titration.)

Electrokinetic phenomena

Main article: Electrokinetic phenomena

Electrophoresis is used for estimating zeta potential of particulates, whereas streaming potential/current is used for porous bodies and flat surfaces. In practice, the zeta potential of dispersion is measured by applying an electric field across the dispersion. Particles within the dispersion with a zeta potential will migrate toward the electrode of opposite charge with a velocity proportional to the magnitude of the zeta potential.

This velocity is measured using the technique of the laser Doppler anemometer. The frequency shift or phase shift of an incident laser beam caused by these moving particles is measured as the particle mobility, and this mobility is converted to the zeta potential by inputting the dispersant viscosity and dielectric permittivity, and the application of the Smoluchowski theories.^[10]

Electrophoresis

Main article: Electrophoresis

Electrophoretic mobility is proportional to electrophoretic velocity, which is the measurable parameter. There are several theories that link electrophoretic mobility with zeta potential. They are briefly described in the article on electrophoresis and in details in many books on colloid and interface science. ^{[3][4][5][11]} There is an IUPAC Technical Report^[12] prepared by a group of world experts on the electrokinetic phenomena. From the instrumental viewpoint, there are three different experimental techniques: microelectrophoresis, electrophoretic light scattering, and tunable resistive pulse sensing. Microelectrophoresis has the advantage of yielding an image of the moving particles. On the other hand, it is complicated by electro-osmosis at the walls of the sample cell. Electrophoretic light scattering is based on dynamic light scattering. It allows measurement in an open cell which eliminates the problem of electro-osmotic flow except for the case of a capillary cell. And, it can be used to characterize very small particles, but at the price of the lost ability to display images of moving particles. Tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) is an impedance-based measurement technique that measures the zeta potential of individual particles based on the duration of the resistive pulse signal.^[13] The translocation duration of nanoparticles is measured as a function of voltage and applied pressure. From the inverse translocation time versus voltage-dependent electrophoretic mobility, and thus zeta potentials are calculated. The main advantage of the TRPS method is that it allows for simultaneous size and surface charge measurements on a particle-by-particle basis, enabling the analysis of a wide spectrum of synthetic and biological nano/microparticles and their mixtures.^[14]

All these measuring techniques may require dilution of the sample. Sometimes this dilution might affect properties of the sample and change zeta potential. There is only one justified way to perform this dilution – by using equilibrium supernatant. In this case, the interfacial equilibrium between the surface and the bulk liquid would be maintained and zeta potential would be the same for all volume fractions of particles in the suspension. When the diluent is known (as is the case for a chemical formulation), additional diluent can be prepared. If the diluent is unknown, equilibrium supernatant is readily obtained by centrifugation.

Streaming potential, streaming current

Main article: Streaming current

The streaming potential is an electric potential that develops during the flow of liquid through a capillary. In nature, a streaming potential may occur at a significant magnitude in areas with volcanic activities.^[15] The streaming potential is also the primary electrokinetic phenomenon for the assessment of the zeta potential at the solid material-water interface. A corresponding solid sample is arranged in such a way to form a capillary flow channel. Materials with a flat surface are mounted as duplicate samples that are aligned as parallel plates. The sample surfaces are separated by a small distance to form a capillary flow channel. Materials with an irregular shape, such as fibers or granular media, are mounted as a porous plug to provide a pore network, which serves as capillaries for the streaming potential measurement. Upon the application of pressure on a test solution, liquid starts to flow and to generate an electric potential. This streaming potential is related to the pressure gradient between the ends of either a single flow channel (for samples with a flat surface) or the porous plug (for fibers and granular media) to calculate the surface zeta potential.

Alternatively to the streaming potential, the measurement of streaming current offers another approach to the surface zeta potential. Most commonly, the classical equations derived by Maryan Smoluchowski are used to convert streaming potential or streaming current results into the surface zeta potential.^[16]

Applications of the streaming potential and streaming current method for the surface zeta potential determination consist of the characterization of surface charge of polymer membranes,^[17] biomaterials and medical devices,^[18][19] and minerals.^[20]

Electroacoustic phenomena

Main article: Electroacoustic phenomena

There are two electroacoustic effects that are widely used for characterizing zeta potential: colloid vibration current and electric sonic amplitude.^[5] There are commercially available instruments that exploit these effects for measuring dynamic electrophoretic mobility, which depends on zeta potential.

Electroacoustic techniques have the advantage of being able to perform measurements in intact samples, without dilution. Published and well-verified theories allow such measurements at volume fractions up to 50%. Calculation of zeta potential from the dynamic electrophoretic mobility requires information on the densities for particles and liquid. In addition, for larger particles exceeding roughly 300 nm in size information on the particle size required as well.^{[citation needed]}

Calculation

The most known and widely used theory for calculating zeta potential from experimental data is that developed by Marian Smoluchowski in 1903.^[21] This theory was originally developed for electrophoresis; however, an extension to electroacoustics is now also available.^[5] Smoluchowski's theory is powerful because it is valid for dispersed particles of any shape and any concentration. However, it has its limitations:

• Detailed theoretical analysis proved that Smoluchowski's theory is valid only for a sufficiently thin double layer, when the Debye length, ${\displaystyle 1/\kappa }$, is much smaller than the particle radius, ${\displaystyle a}$:

${\displaystyle {\kappa }\cdot a\gg 1}$

The model of the "thin double layer" offers tremendous simplifications not only for electrophoresis theory but for many other electrokinetic and electroacoustic theories. This model is valid for most aqueous systems because the Debye length is typically only a few nanometers in water. The model breaks only for nano-colloids in a solution with ionic strength approaching that of pure water.

• Smoluchowski's theory neglects the contribution of surface conductivity. This is expressed in modern theories as the condition of a small Dukhin number:

${\displaystyle Du\ll 1}$

The development of electrophoretic and electroacoustic theories with a wider range of validity was a purpose of many studies during the 20th century. There are several analytical theories that incorporate surface conductivity and eliminate the restriction of the small Dukhin number for both the electrokinetic and electroacoustic applications.

Early pioneering work in that direction dates back to Overbeek^[22] and Booth.^[23]

Modern, rigorous electrokinetic theories that are valid for any zeta potential, and often any ${\displaystyle \kappa a}$, stem mostly from Soviet Ukrainian (Dukhin, Shilov, and others) and Australian (O'Brien, White, Hunter, and others) schools. Historically, the first one was Dukhin–Semenikhin theory.^[24] A similar theory was created ten years later by O'Brien and Hunter.^[25] Assuming a thin double layer, these theories would yield results that are very close to the numerical solution provided by O'Brien and White.^[26] There are also general electroacoustic theories that are valid for any values of Debye length and Dukhin number.^[5][11]

Henry's equation

"Henry's equation" redirects here. For the gas law, see Henry's law.

When κa is between large values where simple analytical models are available, and low values where numerical calculations are valid, Henry's equation can be used when the zeta potential is low. For a nonconducting sphere, Henry's equation is ${\displaystyle u_{e}={\frac {2\varepsilon _{rs}\varepsilon _{0}}{3\eta }}\zeta f_{1}(\kappa a)}$, where f₁ is the Henry function, one of a collection of functions which vary smoothly from 1.0 to 1.5 as κa approaches infinity.^[12]

References

1. IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version: (2006–) "electrokinetic potential, ζ". doi:10.1351/goldbook.E01968
2. "Colloidal systems – Methods for Zeta potential determination". ISO International Standard 13099, Parts 1,2 and 3. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2012.
3. Lyklema J (1995). Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science. Vol. 2. Elsevier. pp. 3–208. ISBN 978-0-12-460529-9.
4. Russel WB (1991). Colloidal dispersions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-42600-8. ^{[page needed]}
5. Dukhin AS (2017). Characterization of liquids, dispersions, emulsions, and porous materials using ultrasound (Third ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-63908-0. ^{[page needed]}
6. Kirby BJ (2010). Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-11903-0.^{[page needed]}
7. Hanaor D, Michelazzi M, Leonelli C, Sorrell CC (2012). "The effects of carboxylic acids on the aqueous dispersion and electrophoretic deposition of ZrO₂". Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 32 (1): 235–244. arXiv:1303.2754. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.08.015. S2CID 98812224.
8. Barbosa JA, Abdelsadig MS, Conway BR, Merchant HA (December 2019). "Using zeta potential to study the ionisation behaviour of polymers employed in modified-release dosage forms and estimating their pK_a". International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1: 100024. doi:10.1016/j.ijpx.2019.100024. PMC 6733289. PMID 31517289.
9. Kumar A, Dixit CK (2017). "Methods for characterization of nanoparticles". Advances in Nanomedicine for the Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids. pp. 43–58. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100557-6.00003-1. ISBN 978-0-08-100557-6.
10. "Zeta Potential Using Laser Doppler Electrophoresis". Malvern.com. Archived from the original on 7 April 2012.
11. Hunter RJ (1989). Foundations of Colloid Science. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-855189-8. ^{[page needed]}
12. Delgado AV, González-Caballero F, Hunter RJ, Koopal LK, Lyklema J (1 January 2005). "Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena (IUPAC Technical Report)". Pure and Applied Chemistry. 77 (10): 1753–1805. doi:10.1351/pac200577101753. hdl:10481/29099. S2CID 16513957.
13. "Zeta Potential Measurement With TRPS". Izon Science.
14. Vogel R, Pal AK, Jambhrunkar S, Patel P, Thakur SS, Reátegui E, et al. (December 2017). "High-Resolution Single Particle Zeta Potential Characterisation of Biological Nanoparticles using Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 17479. Bibcode:2017NatSR...717479V. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14981-x. PMC 5727177. PMID 29234015.
15. Jouniaux, L.; Ishido, T. (2012). "Electrokinetics in Earth Sciences: A Tutorial". International Journal of Geophysics. 2012: e286107. doi:10.1155/2012/286107. ISSN 1687-885X.
16. Luxbacher, Thomas (2014). The ZETA Guide: Principles of the streaming potential technique. Anton Paar GmbH. ISBN 978-3-200-03553-9.
17. Elimelech, Menachem; Chen, William H.; Waypa, John J. (1994). "Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer". Desalination. 95 (3): 269–286. doi:10.1016/0011-9164(94)00064-6. ISSN 0011-9164.
18. Werner, Carsten; König, Ulla; Augsburg, Antje; Arnhold, Christine; Körber, Heinz; Zimmermann, Ralf; Jacobasch, Hans-Jörg (1999). "Electrokinetic surface characterization of biomedical polymers — a survey". Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 159 (2): 519–529. doi:10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00290-3. ISSN 0927-7757.
19. Ferraris, Sara; Cazzola, Martina; Peretti, Veronica; Stella, Barbara; Spriano, Silvia (2018). "Zeta Potential Measurements on Solid Surfaces for in Vitro Biomaterials Testing: Surface Charge, Reactivity Upon Contact With Fluids and Protein Absorption". Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 6: 60. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00060. ISSN 2296-4185. PMC 5954101. PMID 29868575.
20. Fuerstenau, D. W. (1956). "Streaming Potential Studies on Quartz in Solutions of Aminium Acetates in Relation to the Formation of Hemi- micelles at the Quartz-Solution Interface". The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 60 (7): 981–985. doi:10.1021/j150541a039. ISSN 0022-3654.
21. Smoluchowski M (1903). "Przyczynek do teoryi endosm ozy elektrycznej i kilku zjawisk pokrewnych" [Contribution to the theory of electro-osmosis and related phenomena] (PDF) (in Polish). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 10, 2017.
22. Overbeek JT (1943). "Theory of electrophoresis — The relaxation effect". Koll. Bith.: 287.
23. Booth F (January 1948). "Theory of electrokinetic effects". Nature. 161 (4081): 83–86. Bibcode:1948Natur.161...83B. doi:10.1038/161083a0. PMID 18898334.
24. Semenikhin NM, Dukhin SS (January 1975). "Polarization of a Moderately Thin Double-Layer Around Spherical-Particles and Its Influence on Electrophoresis". Colloid Journal of the USSR. 37 (6): 1013–1016.
25. O'Brien RW, Hunter RJ (July 1981). "The electrophoretic mobility of large colloidal particles". Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 59 (13): 1878–1887. doi:10.1139/v81-280.
26. O'Brien RW, White LR (1978). "Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle". Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2. 74: 1607. doi:10.1039/F29787401607.