Remove ads
Uncial 0171 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), ε 07 (Soden) are two vellum leaves of a late third century (or beginning of the fourth) Greek uncial Bible codex containing fragments of the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke. The Luke fragment, in two parts, is preserved in the Laurentian Library collection in Florence (PSI 1.2 + PSI 2.124), and the Matthew fragment is in the Berlin State Museum (P. 11863).[1][2][3]
| New Testament manuscript | |
 | |
| Text | Matthew 10:17-23,25-32; Luke 22:44-50,52-56,61,63-64 |
|---|---|
| Date | c. 300 |
| Script | Greek |
| Found | Hermopolis Magna, Egypt |
| Now at | Medici Library Berlin State Museums |
| Cite | Papiri greci e latini della Società Italiana, (Florence, 1912—), 1:2-4; 2:22-25 |
| Size | 2 vellum leaves; 5.7 x 9.2 cm; 2 columns, 23 lines/page |
| Type | Western |
| Category | IV |
| Hand | reformed documentary |
| Note | witness to Western text in Egypt |
Uncial 0171 measures 5.7 cm by 9.2 cm from a page of two columns of 23 lines. The scribe wrote in a reformed documentary hand.[4] It has errors of itacism, the nomina sacra are contracted (ΚΣ, ΙΗΣ). ανθρωπος is uncontracted. Luke 22:51 and 22:62 are omitted.
The Alands describe the text as "an early (secondary?) form of the D [Codex Bezae] text" and "paraphrastic". Uncial 0171 is an important witness to the existence of the Western text-type in Egypt.[5] Aland placed it in Category IV.[6] It is the earliest Greek witness with text of Luke 22:43–44.
It is classed as a "consistently cited witness of the first order" in Nestle-Aland's Novum Testamentum Graece.[7] Its 27th edition (NA27) considers it even more highly than other witnesses of this type. It provides an exclamation mark (!) for "papyri and uncial manuscripts of particular significance because of their age."[7]
The manuscript was found in 1903–1905 in Hermopolis Magna.[8] The text was first published by the Società Italiana in Florence in 1912. Hermann von Soden knew the first fragment only in time to include it in the list of addenda in 1913. He classified it within his Ια text.[9] Marie-Joseph Lagrange gave a collation, he classifies the fragment in his "recension D", and argues that the divergences of the fragment from the Codex Bezae are due to idiosyncrasies either of that manuscript or of the fragment itself.[10] Kurt Treu identified the Matthew and Luke portions as the work of the same scribe on the same codex.[11] Later again, Neville Birdsall observed that a lower portion of the manuscript had been overlooked in the editio princeps.[12]
Remove ads
- Fragment (a) + (b): Recto (Luke 22:44-50)
_-_recto_-_Luke_22,44-50.jpg)
|
|
- Fragment (a) + (b): Verso (Luke 22:50-56.61-64)
_-_verso_-_Luke_22,50-56.61-64.jpg)
|
|
- Fragment (c): Recto (hair side) (Matthew 10:17-23)
_-_recto_-_Matthew_10,17-25.jpg)
|
|
- Fragment (c): Verso (flesh side) (Matthew 10:25-32)
_-_verso_-_Matthew_10,25-33.jpg)
|
|
Remove ads
- Other early uncials
- Related articles
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
Remove ads