Timeline of major famines in India during British rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Timeline of major famines in India during British rule

The timeline of major famines in India during British rule covers major famines on the Indian subcontinent from 1765 to 1947. The famines included here occurred both in the princely states (regions administered by Indian rulers), British India (regions administered either by the British East India Company from 1765 to 1857; or by the British Crown, in the British Raj, from 1858 to 1947) and Indian territories independent of British rule such as the Maratha Empire.

Quick Facts Country, Period ...
Timeline of major famines in India during British rule
Thumb
Map of famines in India between 1800 and 1878
CountryCompany rule in India, British Raj
Period17651947
Close

The year 1765 is chosen as the start year because that year the British East India Company, after its victory in the Battle of Buxar, was granted the Diwani (rights to land revenue) in the region of Bengal (although it would not directly administer Bengal until 1784 when it was granted the Nizamat, or control of law and order.) The year 1947 is the year in which the British Raj was dissolved and the new successor states of Dominion of India and Dominion of Pakistan were established. The eastern half of the Dominion of Pakistan would become the People's Republic of Bangladesh in 1971.

A "major famine" is defined according to a magnitude scale, which is an end-to-end assessment based on total excess death. According to it: (a) a minor famine is accompanied by less than 999 excess deaths); (b) a moderate famine by between 1,000 and 9,999 excess deaths; (c) a major famine by between 10,000 and 99,999 excess deaths; (d) a great famine by between 100,000 and 999,999 excess deaths; and (e) a catastrophic famine by more than 1 million excess deaths.[1]

The British era is significant because during this period a very large number of famines struck India.[2][3] There is a vast literature on the famines in colonial British India.[4] The mortality in these famines was excessively high and in some may have been increased by British policies.[5] The mortality in the Great Bengal famine of 1770 was between one and 10 million;[6] the Chalisa famine of 17831784, 11 million; Doji bara famine of 17911792, 11 million; and Agra famine of 1837–1838, 800,000.[7] In the second half of the 19th-century large-scale excess mortality was caused by: Upper Doab famine of 1860–1861, 2 million; Great Famine of 1876–1878, 5.5 million; Indian famine of 1896–1897, 5 million; and Indian famine of 1899–1900, 1 million.[8] The first major famine of the 20th century was the Bengal famine of 1943, which affected the Bengal region during wartime; it was one of the major South Asian famines in which anywhere between 1.5 million and 3 million people died.[9]

The era is significant also because it is the first period for which there is systematic documentation.[10] Major reports, such as the Report on the Upper Doab famine of 1860–1861 by Richard Baird Smith, those of the Indian Famine Commissions of 1880, 1897, and 1901 and the Famine Inquiry Commission of 1944, appeared during this period, as did the Indian Famine Codes.[11] These last, consolidating in the 1880s, were the first carefully considered system for the prediction of famine and the pre-emptive mitigation of its impact; the codes were to affect famine relief well into the 1970s.[12] The Bengal famine of 1943, the last major famine of British India occurred in part because the authorities failed to take notice of the famine codes in wartime conditions.[13] The indignation caused by this famine accelerated the decolonization of British India.[14] It also impelled Indian nationalists to make food security an important post-independence goal.[15][16] After independence, the Dominion of India and thereafter the Republic of India inherited these codes, which were modernized and improved, and although there were severe food shortages in India after independence, and malnutrition continues to the present day, there were neither serious famines, nor clear and undisputed or large-scale ones.[17][18][19][20][21] The economist Amartya Sen who won the 1998 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in part for his work on the economic mechanisms underlying famines, has stated in his 2009 book, The Idea of Justice:

Though Indian democracy has many imperfections, nevertheless the political incentives generated by it have been adequate to eliminate major famines right from the time of independence. The last substantial famine in India — the Bengal famine — occurred only four years before the Empire ended. The prevalence of famines, which had been a persistent feature of the long history of the British Indian Empire, ended abruptly with the establishment of a democracy after independence.[22]

Migration of indentured labourers from India to the British tropical colonies of Mauritius, Fiji, Trinidad and Tobago, Surinam, Natal and British Guyana has been correlated to a large number of these famines.[23][24] The first famine of the British period, the Great Bengal famine of 1770, appears in work of the Bengali language novelist Bankim Chandra Chatterjee;[25][26] the last famine of the British period, Bengal famine of 1943 appears in the work of the Indian film director, Satyajit Ray. The inadequate official response to the Great Famine of 1876–1878, led Allan Octavian Hume and William Wedderburn in 1883 to found the Indian National Congress,[27] the first nationalist movement in the British Empire in Asia and Africa.[28] Upon assumption of its leadership by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920, Congress was to secure India both independence and reconciliation.[29][30]

Timeline

More information Chronological list of famines in India between 1765 and 1947, Year ...
Chronological list of famines in India between 1765 and 1947[31]
YearName of famine (if any)British territoryIndian kingdoms/Princely statesMortalityMap or illustration
1769–1770Great Bengal FamineBihar, Western Bengal2-10 million[32][33]
Thumb
The Bengal region shown in a later map (1880)
1783–1784Chalisa famineDelhi, Western Oudh, Eastern Punjab region, Rajputana, and Kashmir11 million people may have died during the years 1782–1784. Severe famine. Large areas were depopulated.[34]
Thumb
Oudh, the Doab (land between the Ganges and Jumna rivers), Rohilkhand, the Delhi territories, eastern Punjab, Rajputana and Kashmir, were affected by the Chalisa famine.
1791–1792Doji bara famine or Skull famineMadras PresidencyHyderabad, Southern Maratha country, Deccan, Gujarat, and Marwar11 million perished during the years 1788–1794. One of the most severe famines known. People died in such numbers that they could not be cremated or buried.[35]
Thumb
Map of India (1795) shows the Northern Circars, Hyderabad (Nizam), Southern Maratha Kingdom, Gujarat, and Marwar (Southern Rajputana), all affected by the Doji bara famine.
1837–1838Agra famine of 1837–1838Central Doab and trans-Jumna districts of the North-Western Provinces (later Agra Province), including Delhi and Hissar0.8 million (or 800,000).[36]
Thumb
Map of the North-Western Provinces showing the region severely afflicted by the famine (in blue)
1860–1861Upper Doab famine of 1860–1861Upper Doab of Agra; Delhi and Hissar divisions of the PunjabEastern Rajputana2 million [36]
Thumb
A map showing the Doab region
1865–1867Orissa famine of 1866Orissa (also 1867) and Bihar; Bellary and Ganjam districts of Madras1 million (Orissa) and approximately 4-5 million in the entire region [37]
Thumb
A 1907 map of Orissa, now Odisha, shown as the southwestern region of Greater Bengal. Coastal Balasore district was one of the worst-hit areas in the Odisha famine of 1866.
1868–1870Rajputana famine of 1869Ajmer, Western Agra, Eastern PunjabRajputana1.5 million (mostly in the princely states of Rajputana) [38]
Thumb
Map of Rajputana consisting of the princely states of the Rajputana Agency and the British territory of Ajmer-Merwara, in 1909; the map was little changed since the year of the famine, 1869.
1873–1874Bihar famine of 1873–1874BiharBecause of an extensive relief effort organized by the Bengal government, there were little to no significant mortalities during the famine [39]
Thumb
A 1907 map of Bihar, British India, shown as the northern region of Greater Bengal. Monghyr district (top middle) was one of the worst-hit areas in the Bihar famine of 1873–74.
1876–1878Great Famine of 1876–1878 (also Southern India famine of 1876–1878)Madras and BombayMysore and Hyderabad5.5 million in British territory [36] Mortality unknown for princely states. Total famine mortality estimates vary from 6.1 to 10.3 million [40]
Thumb
Map of the British Indian Empire (1880), showing where the famine struck. Both years: Madras, Mysore, Hyderabad, and Bombay); during the second year: Central Provinces and the North-Western Provinces, and a small area in the Punjab
1896–1897Indian famine of 1896–1897Madras, Bombay Deccan, Bengal, United Provinces, Central Provinces. Also parts of Punjab specially Bagar tract.[41]Northern and eastern Rajputana, parts of Central India and Hyderabad5 million [42] (1 million in British territory.[36][b]) 12 - 16 Million (in British Territories according to contemporary Western journalist accounts)[46]
Thumb
Map from Chicago Sunday Tribune, January 31, 1897, showing the areas in India affected by the famine.
1899–1900Indian famine of 1899–1900Bombay, Central Provinces, Berar, Ajmer. Also parts of Punjab specially Bagar tract.[41]Hyderabad, Rajputana, Central India, Baroda, Kathiawar, Cutch,1 to 4.5 million (in British territories).[36] Mortality unknown for princely states.[b] Estimated to be 3 to 10 million (in British territories according to contemporary scholars and economists)[47]
Thumb
Map of Indian famine of 1899–1900 from Prosperous British India by William Digby
1943–1944Bengal famine of 1943Bengal1.5 million from starvation; 2.1 to 3 million including deaths from epidemics.[48]
Thumb
A map of the districts of Bengal, 1943, from Famine Enquiry Commission, Report on Bengal, 1945
Close

See also

Notes

  1. According to the writer and retired Indian Civil Servant Charles McMinn, The Lancet's estimates were an overestimate based on a mistake in the population changes in India from 1891-1901. The Lancet, states McMinn, declared that the population increased only by 2.8 million for the whole of India, while the actual increase was 7.5 million according to him. The Lancet source, contrary to McMinn claims, states that the population increased from 287,317,048 to 294,266,702 (2.42%). Adjusting for changes in census tracts, the total population increase in India was only 1.49% between 1891 and 1901, a major decline from the decadal change of 11.2% observed between 1881 and 1891, according to The Lancet article on April 13, 1901. It attributes the decrease in population change rate to excess mortality from successive famines and the plague.[44]
  2. According to a 1901 estimate published in The Lancet, this and other famines in India between 1891 and 1901 caused 19,000,000 deaths from "starvation or to the diseases arising therefrom",[40][43] an estimate criticised by the writer and retired Indian Civil Servant Charles McMinn.[45]

Citations

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.