Loading AI tools
2015 United States Supreme Court case From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. 523 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."[1]
Tibble v. Edison International | |
---|---|
Argued February 24, 2015 Decided May 18, 2015 | |
Full case name | Glenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al. |
Docket no. | 13–550 |
Citations | 575 U.S. 523 (more) 135 S. Ct. 1823; 191 L. Ed. 2d 795 |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act |
Associate Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.[2]
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.