Loading AI tools
Organisation of fine artists (1969 to 1976) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Systems Group was a group of British artists working in the constructivist tradition. The group was formed after an inaugural Helsinki exhibition in 1969 entitled Systeemi•System. The exhibition coordinator Jeffrey Steele together with Malcolm Hughes, invited the participating artists to form a group in 1970. The Systems Group had no manifesto and no formal membership; it existed for the purpose of discussion and exhibition rather than direct collaboration.[1][2]
Some group members were influenced by Swiss Concrete artists, including Richard Paul Lohse; some by the Op art of the Groupe de Recherche d'Art Visuel. Others were influenced by the Constructionists: Victor Pasmore, Mary Martin, Kenneth Martin and Anthony Hill. "Above all, they shared a commitment to a non-figurative art that was not abstracted from the appearance of nature but constructed from within and built up of balanced relations of clear, geometric forms."[3]
The group disbanded in 1976 following political differences among its members. Despite this, individual members kept in touch and exhibited together for over four decades.[4]
The core members of the Systems Group were:
The following artists exhibited with the group:
Gillian Wise and John Ernest had previously exhibited with the Constructionist Group. Regarding group meetings, although Steele brought the group together and was a key member, Hughes subsequently took over the running of the group, which met regularly at his Putney studio.[5]
In November 1969, nine artists selected by Jeffrey Steele exhibited in an exhibition entitled Systeemi•System: An exhibition of syntactic art from Britain at the invitation of the Amos Anderson Art Museum in Helsinki.[6] The exhibition was organised by Steele's Finnish wife Arja Nenonen (1936-2011) and the exhibiting artists were: Malcolm Hughes, Michael Kidner, Peter Lowe, David Saunders, Peter Sedgley, Jean Spencer, Jeffrey Steele, Michael Tyzack and Gillian Wise. Steele chose artists whose interests were associated with his own developing interest in the theory of syntax in art.[1] Each artist selected a different choice of elements, using some kind of rational principle to construct their work.[7]
Syntactic art considers syntactic (structural) relationships between artwork elements more important than any semantic (referential) or pragmatic (expressive) relationships. In other words, in syntactic art the structure and form of the artwork takes precedence over its figurative representation or the viewer's interpretation.
According to semiotician Charles Morris "language is a social system of signs mediating the response of members of the community to one another and to their environment." Additionally "to understand a language or to use it correctly is to follow the rules of usage (syntactical, semantical, and pragmatical) current in the given social community."[8]
Semiotics is the science of semiosis - a process involving the relationships between a sign, what it designates and how it is interpreted by an agent. Semantics is the relationship between a sign and what it designates; pragmatics is the relationship between a sign and how it is interpreted; and syntactics is the relationship between a sign and other signs.[9]
Anthony Hill appropriated Morris's syntactic-semantic-pragmatic framework into his own work, which in turn influenced some members of the Systems Group. 'By syntactic, Hill meant "the relations in the constituent structure, the internal plastic logic", or, put more simply, what happens within the paintings.' [10]
A clear example of syntactic, or constructionist, art is found in Peter Lowe's "Spiral of 8 integers" where, starting from a single central square, a sequence of integers is added until the square root of the sum becomes a whole number, i.e. 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 = . Lowe represents the syntactic relationship visually as a spiral pattern of smaller squares, culminating in the larger 6 x 6 square. Although it's possible to interpret his work mathematically, Lowe emphasises that he discovered this particular relationship empirically.[11][12]
The Cold War lasted from 1945 to 1991. In the short period of its existence the Systems Group accepted the label of Constructivist, but this term was identified with Russia and hence identified with "The Evil Empire". Quoting Peter Lowe: "In the art world, the CIA was covertly ensuring the supremacy of Abstract Expressionism and Minimalism over Russian Constructivism and Formalism as an element of US Cold War propaganda. Local abstract expressionists proliferated in the UK and Abstract Expressionism was promoted in art schools. Journalists and directors of our national institutions favoured US art and linked their careers to it. There was also a good deal of tabloid comment with Syntactic work being invariably labelled 'cold and clinical'. The term 'system' had acquired negative connotations and it was an act of defiance on our part to use it in relation to our group."[13]
Several members of the Systems Group held the view that all acts were political, therefore art was a vehicle for political ideology. At the time, Lowe could not agree, feeling his visual research was apolitical, having been influenced by the writings of Theo van Doesburg's in his essay "An Answer to the Question: Should the New Art Serve the Proletariat?". Things came to a head at a meeting in 1976, after which Lowe resigned from the group. The remaining members found no resolution to their political differences and disbanded shortly afterwards.[14]
Following the decline of the Systems Group, other groups of British constructivists emerged, such as Group Proceedings (1979-1983),[4][24] Exhibiting Space (1983-1989),[4][25] journal Constructivist Forum (1985-1991),[4][26] and Countervail.[27]
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.