Soetardjo Petition

The Soetardjo Petition (Indonesian: Petisi Soetardjo) was a motion of the Volksraad of the Dutch East Indies, instigated by the member Soetardjo Kartohadikusumo, which was submitted as a petition to Queen Wilhelmina and the Estates General of the Netherlands asking for more autonomy.^[1][2][3]

Soetardjo Petition
Presented	15 July 1936
Author(s)	Soetardjo Kartohadikusumo
Purpose	To call for a conference to discuss autonomy and self-governance for the Dutch East Indies within the limits of the Dutch constitutional framework

Background

In 1918, the Dutch colonial government established the Volksraad (People's Council), an advisory body, and by 1931 half of the members were Indonesian. Following repression of nationalists in the 1930s, it became the main forum for "cooperating" Indonesians, whose who were prepared to participate in Dutch established bodies, to express their opinions. In 1935, the main nationalist parties were grouped together under the National Faction led by Mohammad Husni Thamrin.^[4][5]

Soetardjo Kartohadikusumo, president of the Native Civil Servants Association, was not a member of the National Faction. He became more nationalist in outlook partly as a result of resentment over the low standing of Indonesian civil servants relative to Dutch administrators, who he saw as being responsible for the natural group to bring about the advancement of the country. He also felt it was his duty to become an intermediary between the government and the people. As his dissatisfaction with the Dutch grew, he concluded that more autonomy for the East Indies was the best way forward.^[6]

The petition

The document asked for a round table conference to be organized with representatives from the Indies and the Netherlands to discuss the desire of Indonesians, within a period of ten years, to be autonomous under Article 1 of the Dutch Constitution as part of a Dutch commonwealth under the Dutch Crown.^[1][2][3][7]

The petition had six signatories:^[1][8]

• Soetardjo (Javanese, president of Native Civil Servants Association (PPBB))
• Sam Ratulangi (Minahasan)
• Sayyid Ismail Alatas (representative of the ethnic Arab community)
• I. J. Kasimo (Javanese, president of a Catholic association)
• Ko Kwat Tiong Sia (representative of the ethnic Chinese community)
• Datoek Toemoenggoeng (Minangkabau, PPBB member)

Debate and vote in the Volksraad

The vote in the Volksraad took place on 29 September 1936, following a speech by Soetardjo in which he asked for support from the various Dutch factions, stating that there was no desire to sever the political links with the Netherlands. Crucially, the petition was supported by the Indo Europeesch Verbond (Indo European Alliance), with eight seats was the largest European party. The five members of the Politiek-Economischen Bond (Political Economic League) also agreed to support it once the ten-year timetable had been removed. Some Dutch members were opposed to the petition because they saw it as a threat to their position, or believed the Indonesians were not yet ready to assume governing responsibilities. Meanwhile, six Indonesian members, Mohammad Noor, Notosoetarso, Razoux Schultz, Soeroso, Wiryopranoto and Wiwoho also voted against it. Their reasons were varied. Some believed the petition was pointless without wider public support, while others were simply pro-Dutch, or had personal reasons. Eighteen "foreign Asians" and Indonesians, including Thamrin, supported the petition, and in the final vote, the it was approved by the Volksraad by 26 votes to 20.^[9][10][11]

Responses to the petition

After the petition was passed, Indonesia newspapers began to express support for it, although all the European press in tee Indies opposed it. In early 1937, the Dutch parliament decided to wait for official advice from the governor-general before responding. In October of that year, a Central Soetardjo Petition Committee headed by Soetardjo was formed to raise public support by collecting signatures. This resulted in many well-attended public meetings expressing support, but the collection of signatures was not very successful as many people were afraid to sign. A similar committee was formed in the Netherlands, also in October.^[12]

A major setback for supporters of the petition was the lack of support from Indonesian political parties. As expected, the Indonesian Islamic Union Party (PSII) opposed it because of the party's policy of non-cooperation with the colonial authorities. However, of the parties two parties that had seats in the Volksraad, Parindra opposed the petition, while Gerindo supported it, but banned its members from participating in the petition committee. These parties believed the petition to be a pointless gesture, or even a betrayal of those calling for nothing less than full independence.^[13][14]

The Council of the Indies advisory body urged the governor-general to reject the petition, claiming tat it was at odds with the Dutch constitution, and that the East indies was not yet ready for the new role it would have were the petition accepted. In September 1938, Governor-General Alidius Tjarda van Starkenborgh Stachouwer sent his report to the Netherlands. recommending the petition be rejected as calling the conference it demanded would be seen a sign of weakness and would raise false hopes. He also stated that some native organizations also disagreed with the petition, and said that any reforms should be confined to the regional level.^[15]

On November 16, 1938, the petition was rejected by Netherlands by royal decree for the following reasons:^[16]

• It was in contradiction to Article 1 of the Dutch Constitution
• Moves were already underway to increase local involvement in internal policy, and these must be given time to take effect and develop
• Acknowledgement of growing dissent over Dutch rule "could be seen as a sign of weakness"

Notes

1. Klinken 2003. sfn error: no target: CITEREFKlinken2003 (help)
2. Gouda 2008.
3. Foray 2012.
4. Abeyasekere 1973, pp. 81, 84.
5. Abeyasekere 1976, p. 2.
6. Abeyasekere 1973, pp. 86–87.
7. Abeyasekere 1973, p. 82.
8. Abeyasekere 1973, p. 84.
9. Abeyasekere 1973, pp. 91–93.
10. Kahin 1952, p. 95.
11. Handelingen van de Volksraad, p. 1694. sfn error: no target: CITEREFHandelingen_van_de_Volksraad (help)
12. Abeyasekere 1973, pp. 93–95, 98.
13. Abeyasekere 1973, pp. 96–97.
14. Abeyasekere 1976, p. 4.
15. Abeyasekere 1973, pp. 100–101.
16. Abeyasekere 1973, p. 104.

References

• Abeyasekere, Susan (April 1973). "The Soetardjo Petition" (PDF). Indonesia. 15 (15): 81–107. doi:10.2307/3350793. ISSN 0019-7289. JSTOR 3350793.
• Abeyasekere, Susan (1976). One Hand Clapping: Indonesian Nationalists and the Dutch 1939-1942. Monash papers on Southeast Asia. Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University. ISBN 0 909835 38 1.
• Foray, Jennifer L. (2012). Visions of Empire in the Nazi-Occupied Netherlands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-01580-7. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
• Gouda, Frances (2008). Dutch Culture Overseas: Colonial Practice in the Netherlands Indies, 1900-1942. Singapore: Equinox Publishing. ISBN 978-979-3780-62-7. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
• Handelingen van de Volksraad, Zitting 1936-1937 [Acts of the Volksraad, 1936-1937 Session] (PDF) (in Dutch). 1937.
• Kahin, George McTurnan (1952). Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Klinken, Geert Arend van; Klinken, Gerry Van (2003). Minorities, Modernity and the Emerging Nation: Christians in Indonesia, a Biographical Approach. Leiden: KITLV Press. ISBN 978-90-6718-151-8. Retrieved 1 May 2020.