Second Battle of Panipat

The Second Battle of Panipat was fought on 5 November 1556, between Akbar and the king of Delhi, Hemu. Hemu had conquered Delhi and Agra a few weeks earlier by defeating Mughal forces under Tardi Beg Khan in the battle of Delhi. He crowned himself Raja Vikramaditya at Purana Quila in Delhi.

Second Battle Of Panipat
The defeat of Hemu, a c. 1590s painting by Kankar of the Second Battle of Panipat taken from the Akbarnama.
Date 5 November 1556 Location Panipat (in present-day Haryana, India) 29°23′41″N 76°55′34″E Result Mughal victory
Belligerents
Mughal Empire	Sur Empire
Commanders and leaders
Akbar Bairam Khan Mahmud Khan Ali Quli Khan Shaibani Sikandar Khan Uzbak Abdullah Khan Uzbak Shah Quli Mahram	Hemu † Raamya Shadi Khan Kakkar †
Strength
10,000 cavalry 200 war elephants[1]	30,000 cavalry 500 war elephants[1]
Casualties and losses
Unknown	5,000
Location within India

On learning of the loss, Akbar and his guardian Bairam Khan marched to reclaim those territories. The two armies clashed at Panipat, not far from the site of the First battle of Panipat of 1526.

During the battle, Hemu was wounded by an arrow and fell unconscious. Seeing their leader going down, his army panicked and dispersed. Unconscious and almost dead, Hemu was captured and subsequently beheaded by Bairam Khan after Akbar refused to behead him to assume the title of Ghazi.

Background

c. 1910s portrayal of Hemu

Humayun, the successor of Babur, the founder of the Mughal Empire, had lost his inheritance when he was chased out of India by Sher Shah Suri, who established the Sur Empire in 1540. Delhi and Agra fell into Sher Shah's hands, but he died soon after in 1545 at Kalinjar. He was succeeded by his younger son, Islam Shah Suri, who was a capable ruler. However, upon his death in 1554, the Sur Empire was caught up in a succession battle and was plagued by rebellion and the secession of provinces. Humayun made use of this discord to recapture what was lost and on 23 July 1555, the Mughals defeated Sikandar Shah Suri and finally regained control over Delhi and Agra.^[2]

Islam Shah's rightful successor, his 12-year-old son, Firoz Khan, had been murdered by his maternal uncle, who had taken the throne as Adil Shah Suri. The new ruler was, however, more interested in the pursuit of pleasure than in the affairs of his state. Those were left mainly to Hemu, an old Hindu associate of Sher Shah Suri from Rewari, who had risen from humble circumstances to become both Adil Shah's Chief Minister as well as the general of the Suri army.^[3] He was in Bengal when Humayun died on 27 January 1556. The Mughal emperor's death provided an ideal opportunity for Hemu to defeat the Mughals and reclaim lost territory.^[4]

Hemu started a rapid march from Bengal and drove the Mughals out of Bayana, Etawah, Bharthana, Bidhuna, Lakhna, Sambhal, Kalpi, and Narnaul.^[4] In Agra, the governor evacuated the city and fled without a fight upon hearing of Hemu's impending invasion.^[5] In pursuit of the governor, Hemu reached Tughlaqabad, a village just outside Delhi where he ran into the forces of the Mughal governor of Delhi, Tardi Beg Khan, and defeated them in the Battle of Tughlaqabad.^[4] He took possession of Delhi after a day's battle on 7 October 1556^[5] and claimed royal status assuming the title of Vikramaditya (or Bikramjit).^[6]

Prelude

On hearing the disastrous news from Tughlaqabad, Humayun's successor, the 13-year-old Akbar and his guardian, Bairam Khan, soon set off for Delhi. In a stroke of luck, Ali Quli Khan Shaibani (later Khan-i-Zaman), who had been sent ahead with a 10,000-strong cavalry force, chanced upon Hemu's artillery, which was being transported under a weak guard. He could easily capture the entire train of artillery from the Afghans, who abandoned the guns and fled without making a stand. That proved to be a costly loss for Hemu.^[1][7]

On 5 November 1556, the Mughal army met Hemu's army at the historic battlefield of Panipat. Akbar and Bairam Khan stayed in the rear, eight miles from the battleground.^[8]

Formation

The Mughal army was led by Ali Quli Khan Shaibani, with his 10,000 cavalry in the centre, Sikandar Khan Uzbak on the right, and Abdulla Khan Uzbak towards the left. The vanguard was led by Husain Quli Beg and Shah Quli Mahram and included Bairam Khan's detachment of Turks.^[1]

Hemu's army was numerically superior, counting among its ranks a 30,000-strong cavalry force consisting of Afghan horse riders and an elephant contingent numbering 500. Each war elephant was protected by plate armour and mounted by musketeers and crossbowmen. Hemu led his army himself into battle atop an elephant named Hawai.^[9] His left was led by his sister's son, Ramya, and the right by Shadi Khan Kakkar. His army was an experienced and confident lot and Hemu had, by this time, been victorious in 22 battles from Bengal to Punjab. In this battle, however, Hemu had no artillery.^[11]

Battle

Two armies so collided
That they struck fire out of water;
You'd say the air was all crimsoned daggers,
Their steel had all become solid rubies.

Abu'l-Fazl, Akbarnama^[12]

Hemu began the attack himself and loosed his elephants among the right and left wings of the Mughals. Those soldiers who were able to escape the rampage, rather than retreating, chose to veer to the sides and attack the flanks of Hemu's cavalry, pelting them with their superior archery. The Mughal centre also advanced and took up a defensive position before a deep ravine. Neither Hemu's elephant nor his horse units were able to cross the chasm to reach their opponents and were vulnerable to the projectile weapons being fired from the other side. Meanwhile, the Mughal cavalry, on their swift mounts, had made inroads into the Afghan ranks from the flanks and the rear and began targeting the elephants, either slashing at the legs of the great beasts or taking out their riders. Hemu pulled back his elephants, and the Afghan attack relented.^[13]

Seeing the Afghan attack slackening, Ali Quli Khan led his cavalry out, circling around and falling upon the Afghan centre from the rear. Hemu, monitoring the battlefield from his howdah atop Hawai, immediately hurried to counter this charge. Even after seeing Shadi Khan Kakkar and another of his able lieutenants, Bhagwan Das, go down, he continued to lead counterattacks against the Mughals, running down any who challenged his elephants. It was a desperately contested battle, but the advantage seemed to have tilted in favour of Hemu.^[14] Both the wings of the Mughal army had been driven back, and Hemu moved his contingent of war elephants and cavalry forward to crush their centre. It was at this point that Hemu, possibly on the cusp of victory, was wounded when he was struck in the eye by a chance Mughal arrow and collapsed unconscious. Seeing him going down triggered a panic in his army which broke formation and fled.^[15][16] The battle was lost; 5,000 dead lay on the field of battle and many more were killed while fleeing.^[8]

Aftermath

The elephant carrying the unconscious and almost dead Hemu was captured after several hours of finishing the battle and led to the Mughal camp. Bairam Khan asked the 13-year-old Akbar to behead Hemu. According to Akbar's later courtier Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak, he refused to take the sword to a dead man. However, this is not attested by contemporary writer Muhammad Arif Qandhari (composed Tarikh e Akbari), who mentioned that Akbar followed Bairam Khan's advice and himself beheaded Hemu and took the title of Ghazi. The account of Akbar's refusal to kill Hemu is probably a later invention of his courtiers.^{[17][18][19][16]} Hemu's head was sent to Kabul to be hanged outside Delhi Darwaja, while his body was gibbeted on a gate in Purana Quila, Delhi, where he had his coronation on 6 October.^[15] Several supporters and relatives of Hemu were beheaded, and a minaret ^[16] was later erected. The painting of this minarette is one of the popular 56 paintings of Akbar's life in his copy of the Akbarnama. A memorial for Hemu was erected at the spot in Panipat where he was beheaded. It is now known as Hemu's Samadhi Sthal.^[20][21]

With the passing of Hemu, Adil Shah's fortunes also took a turn for the worse. He was defeated and killed by Khizr Khan, son of Muhammad Khan Sur of Bengal, in April 1557.^[16][22] The spoils from the battle at Panipat included 120 of Hemu's war elephants, whose destructive rampages so impressed the Mughals that the animals soon became an integral part of their military strategies.^[23]

See also

• First Battle of Panipat
• Third Battle of Panipat

Notes

1. Sarkar 1960, p. 68.
2. Sarkar 1960, p. 66.
3. Qanungo 1965, p. 448.
4. Chandra 2004, p. 91.
5. Sarkar 1960, p. 67.
6. Richards 1995.
7. Tripathi 1960, p. 175.
8. Sarkar 1960, p. 69.
9. Roy 2004, p. 76.
10. Chandra 2004, p. 92.
11. Sarkar 1960, p. 68: Chandra names Hemu's nephew as Ramaiyya.^[10]
12. Abu'l-Fazl. "Vol II, Chapter XI". Akbarnama. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
13. Sarkar 1960, pp. 68–69.
14. Sarkar 1960, p. 69: According to Sarkar, the battle was still evenly matched when the random arrow found Hemu.
15. Tripathi 1960, p. 176.
16. Chandra 2004, p. 93.
17. Ashirbadi Lal Srivastava (1962). Akbar the Great. Shiva Lal Agarwala. p. 10. OCLC 837892. Bairam Khan asked his royal ward to earn the title of Ghazi by slaying the infidel Hemu, with his own hands. We are told by a contemporary writer, Muhammad Arif Qandh, that he complied with the request and severed Hemu's head from his body. Abul Fazl's statement that he refused to kill a dying man is obviously wrong
18. Kishori Saran Lal (1999). Theory and Practice of Muslim State in India. Aditya Prakashan. p. 67. ISBN 978-81-86471-72-2. It may be recalled that as an adolescent, Akbar had earned the title of Ghazi by beheading the defenseless infidel Himu
19. S. Roy (1974). "AKBAR". In R.C. Majumdar (ed.). The History and Culture of the Indian People: The Mughal Empire. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. p. 106. Bairam Khan begged him to slay Himu with his own hands in order to gain the reward of Jihad (crusade against infidels) and the title of Ghazi (hero combating infiedels). Akbar accordingly struck Himu with his sword. The story of Akbar's magnanimity and refusal to kill a fallen foe seems to be a later courtly invention
20. "Hemu's Samadhi Sthal". Haryana Tourism. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
21. "Places Of Interest / Hemu's Samadhi Sthal". panipat.gov.in. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
22. Tripathi 1960, p. 177.
23. Roy 2013, p. 47.

References

• Sarkar, Jadunath (1960). Military History of India. Orient Longmans. pp. 66–69. ISBN 9780861251551.
• Tripathi, Ram Prasad (1960). Rise and Fall of the Mughal Empire (2nd ed.). pp. 158–77.
• Chandra, Satish (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanate To The Mughals, Part II: Mughal Empire (1526–1748) (3rd ed.). Har-Anand Publications. pp. 91–93. ISBN 9788124110669. Retrieved 17 November 2014.
• Qanungo, Kalika Ranjan (1965). Sher Shah and his Times. Orient Longmans. pp. 448–49.
• Richards, John F. (1995). The Mughal Empire (The New Cambridge History of India). Cambridge University Press. p. 13. ISBN 9780521566032.
• Roy, Kaushik (2004). India's historic battles : from Alexander the Great to Kargil. Delhi: Permanent Black. pp. 68–79. ISBN 9788178241098. Retrieved 17 July 2016.
• Roy, Kaushik (2013). "Fazl, Abul (1551–1602)". In Coetzee, Daniel; Eysturlid, Lee W. (eds.). Philosophers of war: the evolution of history's greatest military thinkers. Santa Barbara: Praeger. pp. 43–47. ISBN 978-0-313-07033-4. Retrieved 20 July 2016.