Scintillation (physics)

For other uses, see Scintillation (disambiguation).

In condensed matter physics, scintillation (/ˈsɪntɪleɪʃən/ SIN-til-ay-shun) is the physical process where a material, called a scintillator, emits ultraviolet or visible light under excitation from high energy photons (X-rays or gamma rays) or energetic particles (such as electrons, alpha particles, neutrons, or ions).^[1][2] See scintillator and scintillation counter for practical applications.^[3][4]

Overview

Scintillation is an example of luminescence, whereby light of a characteristic spectrum is emitted following the absorption of radiation. The scintillation process can be summarized in three main stages: conversion, transport and energy transfer to the luminescence center, and luminescence.^[1][2][5] The emitted radiation is usually less energetic than the absorbed radiation, hence scintillation is generally a down-conversion process.

Conversion processes

The first stage of scintillation, conversion, is the process where the energy from the incident radiation is absorbed by the scintillator and highly energetic electrons and holes are created in the material. The energy absorption mechanism by the scintillator depends on the type and energy of radiation involved. For highly energetic photons such as X-rays (0.1 keV < ${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }}$ < 100 keV) and γ-rays (${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }}$ > 100 keV), three types of interactions are responsible for the energy conversion process in scintillation: photoelectric absorption,^[6] Compton scattering,^[7] and pair production,^[8] which only occurs when ${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }}$ > 1022 keV, i.e. the photon has enough energy to create an electron-positron pair.

These processes have different attenuation coefficients, which depend mainly on the energy of the incident radiation, the average atomic number of the material and the density of the material. Generally the absorption of high energy radiation is described by:

${\displaystyle I=I_{0}\cdot e^{-\mu d}}$

where ${\displaystyle I_{0}}$ is the intensity of the incident radiation, ${\displaystyle d}$ is the thickness of the material, and ${\displaystyle \mu }$ is the linear attenuation coefficient, which is the sum of the attenuation coefficients of the various contributions:

${\displaystyle \mu =\mu _{pe}+\mu _{cs}+\mu _{pp}+\mu _{oc}}$

At lower X-ray energies (${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }\lesssim }$ 60 keV), the most dominant process is the photoelectric effect, where the photons are fully absorbed by bound electrons in the material, usually core electrons in the K- or L-shell of the atom, and then ejected, leading to the ionization of the host atom. The linear attenuation coefficient contribution for the photoelectric effect is given by:^[6][9]

${\displaystyle \mu _{pe}\propto {\rho Z^{n} \over E_{\gamma }^{3.5}}}$

where ${\displaystyle \rho }$ is the density of the scintillator, ${\displaystyle Z}$ is the average atomic number, ${\displaystyle n}$ is a constant that varies between 3 and 4, and ${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }}$ is the energy of the photon. At low X-ray energies, scintillator materials with atoms with high atomic numbers and densities are favored for more efficient absorption of the incident radiation.

At higher energies (${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }}$ ${\displaystyle \gtrsim }$ 60 keV) Compton scattering, the inelastic scattering of photons by bound electrons, often also leading to ionization of the host atom, becomes the more dominant conversion process. The linear attenuation coefficient contribution for Compton scattering is given by:^[7][9]

${\displaystyle \mu _{cs}\propto {\rho \over {\sqrt {E_{\gamma }}}}}$

Unlike the photoelectric effect, the absorption resulting from Compton scattering is independent of the atomic number of the atoms present in the crystal, but linearly on their density.

At γ-ray energies higher than ${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }}$ > 1022 keV, i.e. energies higher than twice the rest-mass energy of the electron, pair production starts to occur. Pair production is the relativistic phenomenon where the energy of a photon is converted into an electron-positron pair. The created electron and positron will then further interact with the scintillating material to generate energetic electron and holes. The attenuation coefficient contribution for pair production is given by:^[8][9]

${\displaystyle \mu _{pp}\propto \rho Z\ln {\Bigl (}{2E_{\gamma } \over m_{e}c^{2}}{\Bigr )}}$

where ${\displaystyle m_{e}}$ is the rest mass of the electron and ${\displaystyle c}$ is the speed of light. Hence, at high γ-ray energies, the energy absorption depends both on the density and average atomic number of the scintillator. In addition, unlike for the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering, pair production becomes more probable as the energy of the incident photons increases, and pair production becomes the most dominant conversion process above ${\displaystyle E_{\gamma }}$~ 8 MeV.

The ${\displaystyle \mu _{oc}}$ term includes other (minor) contributions, such as Rayleigh (coherent) scattering at low energies and photonuclear reactions at very high energies, which also contribute to the conversion, however the contribution from Rayleigh scattering is almost negligible and photonuclear reactions become relevant only at very high energies.

After the energy of the incident radiation is absorbed and converted into so-called hot electrons and holes in the material, these energetic charge carriers will interact with other particles and quasi-particles in the scintillator (electrons, plasmons, phonons), leading to an "avalanche event", where a great number of secondary electron–hole pairs are produced until the hot electrons and holes have lost sufficient energy. The large number of electrons and holes that result from this process will then undergo thermalization, i.e. dissipation of part of their energy through interaction with phonons in the material

The resulting large number of energetic charge carriers will then undergo further energy dissipation called thermalization. This occurs via interaction with phonons for electrons and Auger processes for holes.

The average timescale for conversion, including energy absorption and thermalization has been estimated to be in the order of 1 ps,^[5][10] which is much faster than the average decay time in photoluminescence.

Charge transport of excited carriers

The second stage of scintillation is the charge transport of thermalized electrons and holes towards luminescence centers and the energy transfer to the atoms involved in the luminescence process. In this stage, the large number of electrons and holes that have been generated during the conversion process, migrate inside the material. This is probably one of the most critical phases of scintillation, since it is generally in this stage where most loss of efficiency occur due to effects such as trapping or non-radiative recombination. These are mainly caused by the presence of defects in the scintillator crystal, such as impurities, ionic vacancies, and grain boundaries. The charge transport can also become a bottleneck for the timing of the scintillation process. The charge transport phase is also one of the least understood parts of scintillation and depends strongly on the type material involved and its intrinsic charge conduction properties.

Luminescence

π-electronic energy levels of an organic molecule. S₀ is the ground state. S₁, S₂, S₃ are excited singlet states. T₁, T₂, T₃ are excited triplet states. S₀₀, S₀₁, S₁₀, S₁₁ etc. are vibrational sublevels.

Once the electrons and holes reach the luminescence centers, the third and final stage of scintillation occurs: luminescence. In this stage the electrons and holes are captured potential paths by the luminescent center, and then the electrons and hole recombine radiatively.^[11] The exact details of the luminescence phase also depend on the type of material used for scintillation.

Inorganic crystals

Further information: Scintillation counter § Detection materials

For photons such as gamma rays, thallium activated NaI crystals (NaI(Tl)) are often used. For a faster response (but only 5% of the output) CsF crystals can be used.^[12]: 211

Organic scintillators

In organic molecules scintillation is a product of π-orbitals. Organic materials form molecular crystals where the molecules are loosely bound by Van der Waals forces. The ground state of ¹²C is 1s² 2s² 2p². In valence bond theory, when carbon forms compounds, one of the 2s electrons is excited into the 2p state resulting in a configuration of 1s² 2s¹ 2p³. To describe the different valencies of carbon, the four valence electron orbitals, one 2s and three 2p, are considered to be mixed or hybridized in several alternative configurations. For example, in a tetrahedral configuration the s and p³ orbitals combine to produce four hybrid orbitals. In another configuration, known as trigonal configuration, one of the p-orbitals (say p_z) remains unchanged and three hybrid orbitals are produced by mixing the s, p_x and p_y orbitals. The orbitals that are symmetrical about the bonding axes and plane of the molecule (sp²) are known as σ-electrons and the bonds are called σ-bonds. The p_z orbital is called a π-orbital. A π-bond occurs when two π-orbitals interact. This occurs when their nodal planes are coplanar.

In certain organic molecules π-orbitals interact to produce a common nodal plane. These form delocalized π-electrons that can be excited by radiation. The de-excitation of the delocalized π-electrons results in luminescence.

The excited states of π-electron systems can be explained by the perimeter free-electron model (Platt 1949). This model is used for describing polycyclic hydrocarbons consisting of condensed systems of benzenoid rings in which no C atom belongs to more than two rings and every C atom is on the periphery.

The ring can be approximated as a circle with circumference l. The wave-function of the electron orbital must satisfy the condition of a plane rotator:

${\displaystyle \psi (x)=\psi (x+l)\,}$

The corresponding solutions to the Schrödinger wave equation are:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\psi _{0}&=\left({\frac {1}{l}}\right)^{\frac {1}{2}}\\\psi _{q1}&=\left({\frac {2}{l}}\right)^{\frac {1}{2}}\cos {\left({\frac {2\pi \ qx}{l}}\right)}\\\psi _{q2}&=\left({\frac {2}{l}}\right)^{\frac {1}{2}}\sin {\left({\frac {2\pi \ qx}{l}}\right)}\\E_{q}&={\frac {q^{2}\hbar ^{2}}{2m_{0}l^{2}}}\end{aligned}}}$

where q is the orbital ring quantum number; the number of nodes of the wave-function. Since the electron can have spin up and spin down and can rotate about the circle in both directions all of the energy levels except the lowest are doubly degenerate.

The above shows the π-electronic energy levels of an organic molecule. Absorption of radiation is followed by molecular vibration to the S₁ state. This is followed by a de-excitation to the S₀ state called fluorescence. The population of triplet states is also possible by other means. The triplet states decay with a much longer decay time than singlet states, which results in what is called the slow component of the decay process (the fluorescence process is called the fast component). Depending on the particular energy loss of a certain particle (dE/dx), the "fast" and "slow" states are occupied in different proportions. The relative intensities in the light output of these states thus differs for different dE/dx. This property of scintillators allows for pulse shape discrimination: it is possible to identify which particle was detected by looking at the pulse shape. Of course, the difference in shape is visible in the trailing side of the pulse, since it is due to the decay of the excited states.

See also

• Positron emission tomography

References

1. Scintillation dosimetry. Sam Beddar, Luc Beaulieu. Boca Raton, FL. 2016. ISBN 978-1-4822-0900-6. OCLC 945552892.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
2. Maddalena, Francesco; Tjahjana, Liliana; Xie, Aozhen; Arramel; Zeng, Shuwen; Wang, Hong; Coquet, Philippe; Drozdowski, Winicjusz; Dujardin, Christophe; Dang, Cuong; Birowosuto, Muhammad Danang (February 2019). "Inorganic, Organic, and Perovskite Halides with Nanotechnology for High–Light Yield X- and γ-ray Scintillators". Crystals. 9 (2): 88. doi:10.3390/cryst9020088. hdl:10356/107027. ISSN 2073-4352.
3. Birks, John B. (1964). The theory and practice of scintillation counting. Pergamon Press, Ltd.
4. Knoll, Glenn F. (2000). Radiation Detection and Measurement. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-07338-3.
5. Nikl, Martin (2006-02-10). "Scintillation detectors for x-rays". Measurement Science and Technology. 17 (4): R37–R54. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/17/4/r01. ISSN 0957-0233. S2CID 41368686.
6. Hall, Harvey (1936-10-01). "The Theory of Photoelectric Absorption for X-Rays and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-Rays". Reviews of Modern Physics. 8 (4): 358–397. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.8.358.
7. Eisenberger, P.; Platzman, P. M. (1970-08-01). "Compton Scattering of X Rays from Bound Electrons". Physical Review A. 2 (2): 415–423. Bibcode:1970PhRvA...2..415E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.2.415.
8. Hubbell, J. H. (2006-06-01). "Electron–positron pair production by photons: A historical overview". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 75 (6): 614–623. Bibcode:2006RaPC...75..614H. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2005.10.008. ISSN 0969-806X.
9. Rodnyi, Piotr A. (1997). Physical processes in inorganic scintillators. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-3788-7. OCLC 36240945.
10. Lempicki, A.; Wojtowicz, A. J.; Berman, E. (1993-09-01). "Fundamental limits of scintillator performance". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 333 (2): 304–311. Bibcode:1993NIMPA.333..304L. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(93)91170-R. ISSN 0168-9002.
11. Blasse, G. (1989-05-01). "New luminescent materials". Chemistry of Materials. 1 (3): 294–301. doi:10.1021/cm00003a005. ISSN 0897-4756.
12. Introductory Nuclear Physics. Krane. 1987.