Loading AI tools
American scholar and media personality From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nolan Higdon (born November 3, 1983) is a critical media literacy scholar and media personality. He is also an author and university lecturer of history, education, and media studies. Higdon is a lecturer at University of California, Santa Cruz.[1] Higdon is considered an expert in critical media literacy,[2] podcasting,[3] digital culture,[4] higher education,[5] journalism, fake news, and news media history.[2] Higdon is frequently featured as an expert voice in documentaries and news outlets such as ABC,[6] CBS,[7] CNBC,[8] NewsNation,[9] NBC,[10] New York Times,[11] PBS,[12] and the San Francisco Chronicle.[13]
Nolan Higdon | |
---|---|
Born | Nolan Higdon November 3, 1983 Owensboro, Kentucky, U.S. |
Occupations |
|
Academic background | |
Alma mater | University of California, Davis, B.A. 2009, San Diego State University, M.A. 2012, San Francisco State University, Ed.D. 2017[1] |
Higdon's education focused on History, Latin American Studies, and Critical Media Literacy Education.[1] In the 2010s, Higdon began writing for Project Censored. One of his first pieces to garner attention was a biography of internet personality Alex Jones.[14]
In 2019, Higdon co-wrote United States of Distraction Media Manipulation in Post-Truth America (And What We Can Do About It), with Mickey Huff. Higdon and Huff argue that the implementation of neoliberal policies in the 1970s created weaknesses in the U.S. news media system that Donald Trump exploited. They argued that a dramatic transformation of the U.S. media and education system were needed to strengthen American democracy. The text was lauded by progressives[15] and criticized by conservatives.[16]
In The Anatomy of Fake News (University of California Press, 2020), Higdon argued that the U.S. has always wrestled with fake news. Rather than panic, democracies can mitigate the influence of fake news by making critical news literacy education available to the citizenry.[17] Higdon warned that treating government regulation and censorship as a solution to fake news empowers corporations and government to determine what is true and what is false for citizens.[17] Robin Blom mostly lauded Higdon for making “a convincing argument throughout the book about the need for critical approaches in news literacy education.” However, Blom lamented that “Higdon doubled down on using fake news. Whether he is talking about hoaxes, propaganda, or petty lies…The consistency is praiseworthy, but it also brings us back to square one: What is the actual value of the phrase in public discourse when applied to such a wide range of communication forms?”[18] Wayne Journell celebrated Higdon's history of fake news arguing that it “provides much-needed context for those struggling to understand both the complexities of fake news and how we arrived at the misinformation era we find ourselves in.” Journell wrote “Higdon is at his strongest when providing historical context.” However, Journell's “main criticism” of the book was Higdon's “underlying assumption that consumers of information want accurate information.”[19]
In The Podcaster's Dilemma: Decolonizing Podcasters in the Era of Surveillance Capitalism (Wiley-Blackwell, 2022), Higdon and Nicholas L. Baham III surveyed a 100 podcasts to determine how media makers are using podcasting as a space of decolonization.[20] In a review of The Podcaster's Dilemma, University of Toronto’s L. Dugan Nichols said Higdon and Baham “excel at categorizing the gamut of subversive podcasting, informing readers how the hosts of various shows “confront dominant ideologies” (p. 6) through inquiry, criticism, and “cultural reformulation” (p. 6)—which entails the telling of narratives from a subaltern position.” However, Nichols summation of the text was mixed, “Ultimately, The Podcaster’s Dilemma contains ambiguities and omissions that prevent a more nuanced exploration into the world of leftist podcasting. However, academics conducting research in this area would be remiss to neglect this book. It is an essential read for anyone seeking insight on the resistant potential of a digital medium.”[20]
Higdon regularly publishes op-eds on media, education, and politics.[21][22][13][23][24]
Much of Higdon's work focuses on calling for critical media literacy education to adopted more widely in U.S. schools. In 2023, he warned that schools need to be more proactive in designing and adopting critical media literacy as the rapid innovation in AI in creating complications that beg for critical media literacy education such as deepfakes.[25] [21]
Higdon has been a critic of partisanship and routinely criticizes the policies and positions of both the Democratic Party and Republican Party. Higdon's work often centers hyperpartisanship as the biggest threat to democracy.[26][27] Higdon has accused news media of fostering hyper-partisanship to maximize profits. He claims that news media's hyperpartisan approach to reporting conceals where both the Democratic Party and Republican Party agree such as electoral denialism,[28] federal production of reproductive rights,[29][30] and free speech.[17] As a result, news audiences end uninformed or misinformed.[17]
Higdon claims to be an anti-censorship personality and free speech advocate.[31][32][33] He has been highly critical of both the Democratic Party and Republican Party for using fake news as a proxy to censor individuals and organizations.[17] Higdon has argued that the Twitter Files reveal that the government – regardless of the party in power – engages in censorship by proxy when they pressure Big Tech to censor content.[17][34][35][36] Higdon wrote "Those interested in protecting Constitutional rights and resisting this intolerance on college campuses today should not necessarily count on liberals to help them. Indeed, it is difficult to take liberal commitments to Constitutional rights seriously when they have been gleefully supporting censorship. Similarly, it is abundantly clear that many conservatives have very limited, ideologically circumstantial commitments to civil rights and free expression."[37] Higdon has been highly critical of the news media's coverage of Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter. He argues that when it comes to free speech, to focus on Musk is to miss how the entire industry of Big Tech manipulates and exploits users.[7][9][13][38][39][40] Michael Rectenwald concluded that the critiques of Elon Musk demonstrated that Higdon was anti-free speech[41]
Higdon is highly critical of Big Tech.[10] He claims that Big Tech spreads propaganda to convince audiences that it is an industry motivated by altruism, but in reality, it is just another greedy and corrupt industry that swindles people.[23][9][13] Higdon has accused Big Tech of concealing efforts to swindle and exploit schools with altruistic motives such as donating chrome books to schools.[12] Higdon and co-author Allison Butler from University of Massachusetts, Amherst in USA Today explained “Schools are becoming the testing ground for new surveillance technologies in large part because compulsory education makes the vast majority of young people in America a captive audience. Often introduced under the guise of safety, surveillance technologies collect copious amounts of data, beyond what might be needed for educational purposes.”[22]
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.