Life for Ruth

1962 film by Basil Dearden From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Life for Ruth

Life for Ruth (U.S. title: Walk in the Shadow) is a 1962 British drama film produced by Michael Relph directed by Basil Dearden and starring Michael Craig, Patrick McGoohan and Janet Munro.[2]

Quick Facts Directed by, Written by ...
Life for Ruth
Thumb
Theatrical poster
Directed byBasil Dearden
Written byJanet Green
James McCormick
Produced byMichael Relph
StarringMichael Craig
Patrick McGoohan
Janet Munro
CinematographyOtto Heller
Edited byJohn D. Guthridge
Music byWilliam Alwyn
Production
company
Distributed byRank Film Distributors
Release dates
  • 30 August 1962 (1962-08-30) (World Premiere, London)
  • 1966 (1966) (US)
Running time
93 minutes
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Budget£126,800[1]
Box office£53,788 (by 1971)[1]
Close

Plot

John Harris finds himself ostracized and placed on trial for allowing his daughter Ruth to die. His religious beliefs forbade him to give consent for a blood transfusion that would have saved her life. Doctor Brown is determined to seek justice for what he sees as the needless death of a young girl.

Cast

Production

The film was based on an original script by the husband and wife team of Janet Green and John McCormick, who had written Sapphire and Victim for Dearden and Relph. They wrote it in 1961 under the title God the Father then A Matter of Conscience.[3]

Michael Craig had worked with Dearden and Relph on Sapphire. He says he was "surprised to be offered the film - playing a North country working class chap seemed against type - but I was delighted to do it."[4]

Filming took place in Sunderland and Seaham Harbour Co Durham,

Reception

Summarize
Perspective

The film had its World Premiere on 30 August 1962 at the Leicester Square Theatre in London's West End.[5]

Box office

The film was a failure at the box office, contributing to the collapse of Allied Film Makers.[1]

Critical

The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "The bleak Durham locations are photographed with a stylish sense of dramatic effect. But the weakness is that of most British problem pictures. Despite the explosive nature of the material and its sideshoots (such as, whether denying a man his religious right to "sacrifice" his child smacks of persecution) the film is completely uncommitted. Meticulously it gives free speech to every shade of opinion on the subject, while taking sides with none ...The film will offend no one, with the possible exception of street-corner sensation-mongers. Emotionally, however, the theme cannot really fail to be moving, and the torment of husband and wife is well expressed by Michael Craig and Janet Munro, though others in the cast wear their working-class air less convincingly."[6]

The New York Times wrote of the film, "in avoiding blatant bias, mawkish sentimentality and theatrical flamboyance, it makes a statement that is dramatic, powerful and provocative."[7]

Filmink felt "the film would’ve been better had" Munro "been given something more to do, such as McGoohan being in love with her or something," adding "Life for Ruth is actually very well made, but a kid dies in the first half hour – it’s hard to get a film’s momentum back after that."[8]

See also

References

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.