Loading AI tools
Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1885–1950 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Islington South was a parliamentary constituency in the Metropolitan Borough of Islington in North London. It returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Islington South | |
---|---|
Former borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1885–1950 | |
Seats | one |
Created from | Finsbury |
Replaced by | Islington South West |
The constituency was created for the 1885 general election, and abolished for the 1950 general election.
The constituency was defined as comprising 3 wards of the parish of Islington: Barnsbury, St Mary and St Peter. These wards were used for the election of vestryman under the Metropolis Management Act 1855.[1]
Under the Representation of the People Act 1918 constituencies in the County of London were redefined in terms of the Metropolitan Boroughs created in 1900. The constituency was defined as comprising three wards of the Metropolitan Borough of Islington having the same names as the previous wards: Barnsbury, St Mary and St Peter.[1]
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | Henry Spicer | Liberal | |
1886 | Sir Albert Rollit | Conservative | |
1906 | Thomas Wiles | Liberal | |
1918 | Charles Higham | Unionist | |
1922 | Charles Garland | Unionist | |
1923 | William Cluse | Labour | |
1931 | Tom Howard | Conservative | |
1935 | William Cluse | Labour | |
1950 | constituency abolished |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Spicer | 3,050 | 54.9 | ||
Conservative | Henry Wildey Wright[3] | 2,502 | 45.1 | ||
Majority | 548 | 9.8 | |||
Turnout | 5,552 | 79.0 | |||
Registered electors | 7,024 | ||||
Liberal win (new seat) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Albert Rollit | 2,774 | 55.7 | +10.6 | |
Liberal | Henry Spicer | 2,208 | 44.3 | −10.6 | |
Majority | 566 | 11.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,982 | 70.9 | −8.1 | ||
Registered electors | 7,024 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +10.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Albert Rollit | 3,194 | 52.6 | −3.1 | |
Liberal | William Digby | 2,873 | 47.4 | +3.1 | |
Majority | 321 | 5.2 | −6.2 | ||
Turnout | 6,067 | 73.1 | +2.2 | ||
Registered electors | 8,299 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −3.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Albert Rollit | 3,563 | 60.3 | +7.7 | |
Liberal | Heber Hart | 2,342 | 39.7 | −7.7 | |
Majority | 1,221 | 20.6 | +15.4 | ||
Turnout | 5,905 | 71.6 | −1.5 | ||
Registered electors | 8,244 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +7.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Albert Rollit | 3,881 | 70.0 | +9.7 | |
Liberal | James Andrew Strahan | 1,665 | 30.0 | −9.7 | |
Majority | 2,216 | 40.0 | +19.4 | ||
Turnout | 5,546 | 63.1 | −8.5 | ||
Registered electors | 8,796 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +9.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 3,606 | 55.7 | +25.7 | |
Conservative | Albert Rollit | 1,991 | 30.8 | −39.2 | |
Ind. Conservative | W. Hunt[n 1] | 870 | 13.5 | New | |
Majority | 1,615 | 24.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,467 | 77.3 | +14.2 | ||
Registered electors | 8,361 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +32.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 3,917 | 55.1 | −0.6 | |
Conservative | David Faber | 3,187 | 44.9 | +14.1 | |
Majority | 730 | 10.2 | −14.7 | ||
Turnout | 8,268 | 85.9 | +8.6 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 3,494 | 55.5 | +0.4 | |
Conservative | Lionel Wormser Harris | 2,803 | 44.5 | −0.4 | |
Majority | 691 | 11.0 | +0.8 | ||
Turnout | 8,268 | 76.2 | −9.7 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing |
General Election 1914–15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Charles Higham | 6,885 | 53.9 | +9.4 |
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 5,883 | 46.1 | −9.4 | |
Majority | 1,002 | 7.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 12,768 | 44.1 | −32.1 | ||
Registered electors | 28,976 | ||||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +9.4 | |||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Charles Garland | 7,877 | 36.1 | −17.8 | |
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 7,352 | 33.6 | −12.5 | |
Labour | Frederick Pethick-Lawrence | 6,634 | 30.3 | New | |
Majority | 525 | 2.5 | −5.3 | ||
Turnout | 21,863 | 64.2 | +20.1 | ||
Registered electors | 34,029 | ||||
Unionist hold | Swing | −2.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Cluse | 7,764 | 37.0 | +6.7 | |
Liberal | Edward Brotherton-Ratcliffe | 7,531 | 35.9 | +2.3 | |
Unionist | Charles Garland | 5,691 | 27.1 | −9.0 | |
Majority | 233 | 1.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 20,986 | 60.9 | −3.3 | ||
Registered electors | 34,462 | ||||
Labour gain from Unionist | Swing | +2.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Cluse | 10,347 | 42.8 | +5.8 | |
Unionist | Tom Howard | 8,668 | 35.9 | +8.8 | |
Liberal | Edward Brotherton-Ratcliffe | 5,158 | 21.3 | −14.6 | |
Majority | 1,679 | 6.9 | +5.8 | ||
Turnout | 24,173 | 69.4 | +8.5 | ||
Registered electors | 34,818 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | −1.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Cluse | 13,737 | 46.6 | +3.8 | |
Unionist | Tom Howard | 9,418 | 32.0 | −3.9 | |
Liberal | Frank Milton | 6,316 | 21.4 | +0.1 | |
Majority | 4,319 | 14.6 | +7.7 | ||
Turnout | 29,471 | 66.2 | −3.2 | ||
Registered electors | 44,490 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | +3.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Tom Howard | 18,071 | 62.4 | +29.4 | |
Labour | William Cluse | 10,910 | 37.6 | −9.0 | |
Majority | 7,161 | 24.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 28,981 | 64.8 | −1.4 | ||
Conservative gain from Labour | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Cluse | 12,526 | 52.4 | +14.8 | |
Conservative | Tom Howard | 11,398 | 47.6 | −14.8 | |
Majority | 1,128 | 4.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 23,924 | 56.7 | −8.1 | ||
Labour gain from Conservative | Swing |
General Election 1939–40
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1940. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the Autumn of 1939, the following candidates had been selected;
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Cluse | 12,893 | 72.5 | +20.1 | |
Conservative | Tom Howard | 4,877 | 27.5 | −20.1 | |
Majority | 8,016 | 45.0 | +40.2 | ||
Turnout | 17,770 | 64.0 | +3.3 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.