Fracture in polymers

Polymer fracture is the study of the fracture surface of an already failed material to determine the method of crack formation and extension in polymers both fiber reinforced and otherwise.^[1] Failure in polymer components can occur at relatively low stress levels, far below the tensile strength because of four major reasons: long term stress or creep rupture, cyclic stresses or fatigue, the presence of structural flaws and stress-cracking agents. Formations of submicroscopic cracks in polymers under load have been studied by x ray scattering techniques and the main regularities of crack formation under different loading conditions have been analyzed. The low strength of polymers compared to theoretically predicted values are mainly due to the many microscopic imperfections found in the material. These defects namely dislocations, crystalline boundaries, amorphous interlayers and block structure can all lead to the non-uniform distribution of mechanical stress.

Long term stress or Creep Failure

Taking into account the viscoelastic path at small strain based on thermally activated rate processes. When strain attains higher values, high enough to lead to failure, its slope versus time exhibits an abrupt change. At this specific time the creep function appears a minimum.^[2] In most cases DMTA (Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis) can be used to determine the viscoelastic behavior of samples as a function of time. A classic case is when the rubber hose ruptures due to creep after many years of service. DMTA can be used for o-rings and gaskets to measure the creep rates.

Fatigue Failure

The term fatigue refers to the effect of cyclic or intermittent loads. Cyclic loading due to either oscillating mechanical stress or to alternate heating and cooling is more detrimental than static loading. Under cyclic load, cracks initiate at localized sites within the part and these extend in size during cycling. Ultimately they expand and join to such an extent that the material can no longer hold and support the stress. Fractures can be characterized by a series of concentric crack growth bands that grow from the surface initiation site. Cyclic loading can bring about failure in polymer due to: chain scission, built up heat due to hysteresis, recrystallization of material and cumulative crack generation.

Chain scission

Chain scission occurs in a polymer as a result of intense localized heat. The chemical bond in a polymer backbone may be broken with the generation of free radicles by heat, ionizing irradiation, mechanical stress and chemical reactions. These scissions multiply in number and cause a fracture tip initialization to occur followed by its growth.^[3]

Built-up heat from hysteresis

Polymers are viscoelastic by nature, and exhibit mechanical hysteresis even at moderate strains due to continuous elongation and contraction. Some of this inelastic deformation energy is dissipated as heat within the polymer, and consequently the materials temperature will rise as a function of frequency, testing temperature, the stress cycle and the type of polymer. As the temperature within the polymer rises, the stiffness and yield strength will fall, and thermal failure becomes a possibility as deformation levels become excessive.

Fracture Mechanics in Polymers

Fracture mechanics in polymers has become an increasingly concerning field as many industries transition to implementing polymers in many critical structural applications. As industries make the shift to implementing polymeric materials, a greater understanding of failure mechanisms for these polymers is needed . Polymers may exhibit some inherently different behaviors than metals when cracks are subject to loading. This is largely attributed to their tough and ductile mechanical properties. Microstructurally, metals contain grain boundaries, crystallographic planes and dislocations while polymers are made up of long molecular chains. In the same instance that fracture in metals involves breaking bonds, the covalent and van der Waals bonds need to be broken for fracture to occur. These secondary bonds (van der Waals) play an important role in the fracture deformation at crack tip. Many materials, such as metals, use linear elastic fracture mechanics to predict behavior at the crack tip. For some materials this is not always the appropriate way to characterize fracture behavior and an alternate model is used. Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics relates to materials that show a time independent and nonlinear behavior or in other words plastically deform. The initiation site for fracture in these materials can often occur at inorganic dust particles where the stress exceeds critical value.

Under standard linear elastic fracture mechanics, Griffiths law can be used to predict the amount of energy needed to create a new surface by balancing the amount of work needed to create new surfaces with the sample's stored elastic energy. His popular equation below provides the necessary amount of fracture stress required as a function of crack length. E is the young's modulus of the material, γ is the surface free energy per area and a is the crack length.

${\displaystyle \sigma ={\sqrt {\frac {2\gamma E}{\pi a}}}}$

Griffith Law

While many ideas from the linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) models are applicable to polymers there are certain characteristics that need to be considered when modeling behavior. Additional plastic deformation should be considered at crack tips as yielding is more likely to occur in plastics.

Yielding Mechanisms

Figure 1 - Crack-tip Craze Zone

As metals yield through dislocation motions in the slip planes, polymer yield through either shear yielding or crazing.^[4] In shear yielding, molecules move with respect to one another as a critical shear stress is being applied to the system resembling a plastic flow in metals. Yielding through crazing is found in glassy polymers where a tensile load is applied to a highly localized region. High concentration of stress will lead to the formation of fibrils in which molecular chains form aligned sections. This also creates voids which are known as cavitation and can be seen at a macroscopic level as a stress-whitened region as shown in Figure 1. These voids surround the aligned polymer regions.^[5] The stress in the aligned fibrils will carry majority of the stress as the covalent bonds are significantly stronger than the van der Waals bonds. The plastic like behavior of polymers leads to a greater assumed plastic deformation zone in front of the crack tip altering the failure process.^[6]

Crack Tip Behavior

Just as in metals, when the stress at the crack tip approaches infinity, a yield zone will form at this crack tip front. Craze yielding is the most common yielding method at the crack front under tension due to the high triaxial stresses being applied in this local region. The Dugdale- Barenblatt strip-yield model is used to predict the length of the craze zone.^[7] KI represent the stress intensity factor, s is the crazing stress being applied to the system (perpendicular to the crack in this situation), and r is the crazing zone length.

${\displaystyle \rho =\pi /8(K_{I}/\sigma _{c})}$

Dugdale-Barenblatt strip-yield model

The equation for stress intensity factor for a specimen with a single crack is given in the following equation where Y is a geometric parameter, s is the stress being applied and a is the crack length. For an edge crack ‘a’ is the total length of the crack where as a crack not on the edge has a crack length of ‘2a’.

${\displaystyle K=Y\sigma \surd (\pi *a)}$

Stress Intensity Equation

As the fibrils in the crack begin to rupture the crack will advance in either a stable, unstable or critical growth depending on the toughness of the material. To accurately determine the stability of a crack growth and R curve plot should be constructed. A unique tip of fracture mode is called stick/slip crack growth. This occurs when an entire crack zone ruptures at some critical crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) followed by a crack arrest and then the formation of a new crack tip.

Critical Stress Intensity Factor

The critical stress intensity factor (K_IC) can be defined as the threshold value of stress intensity base on the material properties. Therefore, the crack will not propagate so long as K_I is less than K_IC. Since K_IC is a material property it can be determined through experimental testing.^[8] ASTM D5045-99 provides a standard testing method for determining critical stress of plastics. Although K_IC is material dependent it can also be a function of thickness. Where plane stress is dominant in low thickness samples increasing the critical stress intensity. As your thickness increases the critical stress intensity will decrease and eventually plateau. This behavior is caused by the transitioning from the plane stress to plain strain conditions as the thickness increases. Fracture morphology is also dependent on conditions at the located at the crack tip.

Fatigue

Figure 2 - Hysteresis Stress Strain Curve

As the needs for polymers for engineering purposes are increasing, the fatigue behavior of polymers is receiving more attentions. Polymer fatigue life is affected by multiple factors, including temperature, oxidation, crystallization and so on.^[9] Therefore, the need becomes vital for people to study and predict the mechanical performances of polymers under different environments.

The experimental methods to study polymer fatigue vary, including pure shear test, simple extension test, single edge crack test and tearing test,^[10] among which the most widely used geometry people adopt is mode I cyclic tension test under pure geometry.^[11][12] This is due to the fact that polymers have viscoelastic behavior and poor conductivity of heat, and they are more sensitive to their cyclic loading conditions than metal.^[13] Unlike metals and other materials, polymer do not cyclic harden; rather, polymers perform cyclic softening for most of the time, and the extent of which usually depends on the loading conditions of the experimental setup. In a rare case, polymers can also remain cyclically stable under small strain deformations, during which the polymer remain linearly elastic.^[13] However, mode III geometry has also been applied to test on twisted rubber disks for further understanding of its fracture behaviors.^[14][15][16]

In reinforced polymers, crack initiation usually occurs at the interface of polymer fiber and the matrix. Fatigue performances in polymers caused by cyclical loading usually go through two stages: crack initiation/nucleation and crack growth. Hence, a lot of researcher design experiments to study the fatigue behaviors of polymers according to these two phases, especially for rubber fatigue.

Crack Nucleation Approach^[17]

The crack nucleation approach considers that polymers will eventually crack under a history of stress and strains. Study under this proposal is first adapted by August Wöhler in the 1860s,^[18] who aimed to study railroad axles. Two important parameters are involved in this conversation: maximum principal strain and strain energy density.^[12] As strain is easier to be determined by controlling displacements in actual experimental tests, it is natural to set controlled strain. The alternating and maximum values of the maximum principle strain decides the nucleation life in polymer, but there is not yet any theory to quantitatively describe the strain conditions to fatigue life in lab tests. The strain energy density is defined as the energy invested into the volume unit of polymeric material for deformation, also known as the elastic energy per unit volume in the solid. In crack nucleation approach, no crack is introduced into the sample initially, and crack initiation is observed under loadings.

Crack Growth Approach

Unlike crack initiation approach, the crack growth approach introduces a pre-existing crack to the specimen, and calculate for the crack propagation rate under cyclic loadings. Because of the pre-existing crack, the elastic energy released by fracture will associate with the surface energy at new crack surfaces,^[12] and it was found that the crack propagation rate can be described by a function of the energy release rate, depending on which regime of crack propagation this relation is in.^[11] Four regimes were proposed: the steady-state regime, the linear regime, the power-law regime and the fourth regime where crack grows catastrophically. In the power-law regime, the relation is found to be similar to the Paris law, which was found by Paris et al.^[19] in metals.

Hysteresis heating and Chain scission

Fatigue in polymers, controlled by cyclical loading, is caused by two general mechanisms: hysteresis heating and chain scission. If the polymer is relatively brittle, it will exhibit fatigue crack growth through chain scission. In this mechanism, the crack-tip yielding is limited by the brittle material properties and each loading cycle breaks a specific amount of bonds allowing the crack front to advance. Polymers with viscoelastic behavior fatigue by the hysteresis heating mechanism. In this mechanism, during loading and unloading, the polymer the stress-strain curve will act as a hysteresis loop as shown in Figure 2, creating energy on the material as discussed before. Because energy is dissipated to the crack tip, this process is different from the cyclic loading of an elastic material where the loading and unloading paths are the same and strain energy can be recovered. The work inputted into the material (area of the hysteresis loop) is converted to heat raising the temperature of the material, possibly above the glass transition temperature. This creates a localized melting at the crack tip allowing the crack to advance. The magnitude at which the crack front will advance is largely dependent on the amount/magnitude of cycles, glass transition temperature of the material and the thermal conductivity of the polymer. A polymer that has a high thermal conductivity will dissipate the heat much fast than a material with a low coefficient.

Figure 3 - Cumulative Loading S-N Curve

A S-N curve represents the amount of cycles being applied along with the stress amplitude and can derived from the Goodman relationship.

${\displaystyle \sigma _{a}=\sigma _{f}(1-\sigma _{m}/\sigma _{t})}$ (Goodman Relationship)

Where σ_f is the fatigue stress, σ_m is mean stress, σ_a is the amplitude stress and σ_t is the tensile stress of the sample being tested. In certain applications of polymers, materials will experience cyclic loading at different stress levels. Figure 3 gives an S-N diagram of cumulative cycles being applied at different stress amplitudes. The variable n represents the number of cycles being applied at the designated stress level and N is the fatigue life at the same stress level.

Figure 4 - Power Law Regime

Many times, polymeric materials containing a crack are subject to cyclic loading in service. This decreases the life expectancy of the sample drastically and should be taken into consideration. In cases where polymers such as PVC follow the rules of linear elastic fracture mechanics, Paris law may be used to relate the fatigue crack propagation rate to the magnitude of stress intensity being applied. Below a certain stress intensity, crack propagation slowly increases until stable crack propagation is reached from higher levels of stress intensity. Higher levels of stress intensity leads to an unstable crack rate as shown in Figure 4. This figure is a log plot of the crack propagation rate versus the max stress intensity example. The stable crack growth regime represents the linear region of the red curve which is described using the Power Law model where ‘A’ is a pre-exponential factor.

${\displaystyle da/dN=A(K)^{m}}$(Power Law Regime Equation)

Recrystallization

This process can be caused as a consequence of extensive movement of chain segments like in case or work hardening of materials.

Fatigue in Nylon

When a Nylon component is subjected to conditions of tensile fatigue, failure occurs when a minimum strain is reached. this means that the lifetime of nylon material is dictated by the time under load and not on the number of cycles

Fatigue of Short-Fibre-Reinforced Plastics

Fatigue failure in these reinforced polymers is due to the formation of micro cracks that are easily initiated, and which coalesce into one crack, causing the final failure ^[20]

Impact Fracture

A good polymer is generally defined as one capable of absorbing a large amount of energy before failure. Polycarbonates have one of the highest impact resistance values. However, amorphous polymers exhibit brittle behaviour under impact, especially if the component is notched or is too thick relative to a corner radius. The occurrence of brittle failure can be decreased by: increasing the molecular weight, inclusion of rubber phase, inducing orientation in the polymer and reducing internal defects and contaminants.

Measuring impact strength

Conventional Izod tests are used to measure the energy required to break a notched specimen. however, this is not considered as a satisfactory test. Major limitation being that most polymers as notch sensitive and fail readily under izod test.

Blends

Blended materials can have an increased fracture toughness with balanced stiffness and strength. Usually these are formed from copolymerization or modification with a suitable elastomer. However, the mechanical properties of blends, especially the modulus, follow the ‘rule of mixture’ Voigt model and the morphologies show coarsed dispersion.^[21]

References

1. John Scheirs, “john wiley and sons”, 30-oct-2000 “[Compositional and Failure Analysis of Polymers: A Practical Approach]”
2. G. Spathis, E. Kontou, “Creep failure time prediction of polymers and polymer composites”
3. Robert Oboigbaotor Ebewele,"CRC Press,2000" "polymer science and technology"
4. Hertzberg, Richard (2013). Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials. Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
5. Arencon, David (November 2009). "Fracture Toughness of Polypropylene-Based Particulate Composites". Materials. 2 (4): 2046. Bibcode:2009Mate....2.2046A. doi:10.3390/ma2042046. hdl:2117/6841 – via MDPI.
6. Zeidi, Mahdi; Kim, Chun IL; Park, Chul B. (2021). "The role of interface on the toughening and failure mechanisms of thermoplastic nanocomposites reinforced with nanofibrillated rubbers". Nanoscale. 13 (47): 20248–20280. doi:10.1039/D1NR07363J. ISSN 2040-3372. PMID 34851346. S2CID 244288401.
7. Anderson, T.L. (2005). Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications Third Addition. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.
8. Hawinkels, R.J.H. (August 30, 2011). "Fatigue Crack Propagation in Polycarbonate". Einfhoven.
9. Mars, W. V.; Fatemi, A. (July 2004). "Factors that Affect the Fatigue Life of Rubber: A Literature Survey". Rubber Chemistry and Technology. 77 (3): 391–412. doi:10.5254/1.3547831. ISSN 0035-9475.
10. Aliha, M.R.M.; Bahmani, A.; Akhondi, Sh. (July 2016). "A novel test specimen for investigating the mixed mode I+III fracture toughness of hot mix asphalt composites – Experimental and theoretical study". International Journal of Solids and Structures. 90: 167–177. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.03.018. ISSN 0020-7683.
11. Mzabi, Samy; Berghezan, Daniel; Roux, Stéphane; Hild, Francois; Creton, Costantino (2011-09-07). "A critical local energy release rate criterion for fatigue fracture of elastomers" (PDF). Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 49 (21): 1518–1524. Bibcode:2011JPoSB..49.1518M. doi:10.1002/polb.22338. ISSN 0887-6266.
12. MARS, W; FATEMI, A (September 2002). "A literature survey on fatigue analysis approaches for rubber". International Journal of Fatigue. 24 (9): 949–961. doi:10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00008-7. ISSN 0142-1123.
13. Courtney, Thomas H. (2013). Mechanical Behavior of Materials. McGraw Hill Education (India). ISBN 978-1259027512. OCLC 929663641.
14. Aboutorabi, H.; Ebbott, T.; Gent, A. N.; Yeoh, O. H. (March 1998). "Crack Growth in Twisted Rubber Disks. Part I: Fracture Energy Calculations". Rubber Chemistry and Technology. 71 (1): 76–83. doi:10.5254/1.3538474. ISSN 0035-9475.
15. De, D. K.; Gent, A. N. (March 1998). "Crack Growth in Twisted Rubber Disks. Part II: Experimental Results". Rubber Chemistry and Technology. 71 (1): 84–94. doi:10.5254/1.3538475. ISSN 0035-9475.
16. Gent, A. N.; Yeoh, O. H. (November 2003). "Crack Growth in Twisted Rubber Disks. Part 3. Effects of Crack Depth and Location". Rubber Chemistry and Technology. 76 (5): 1276–1289. doi:10.5254/1.3547802. ISSN 0035-9475.
17. Verron, E; Huneau, B; Beurrot, S (September 2009), "In-situ SEM study of fatigue crack growth mechanism in carbon black-filled natural rubber" (PDF), Constitutive Models for Rubber VI, CRC Press, pp. 319–324, doi:10.1201/noe0415563277.ch52 (inactive 2024-11-11), ISBN 9780415563277{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
18. Wöhler, A (1867). "Wöhler's experiments on the strength of metals". Engineering. 4: 160–161.
19. Paris, P.; Erdogan, F. (1963). "A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws". Journal of Basic Engineering. 85 (4): 528. doi:10.1115/1.3656900. ISSN 0021-9223.
20. Mandell and Lang
21. Wolfgang Grellmann, Sabine Seidler, “Springer 2001” “Deformation and Fracture Behaviour of Polymers”