Loading AI tools
Journaling file system for Linux From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ext4 (fourth extended filesystem) is a journaling file system for Linux, developed as the successor to ext3.
Developer(s) | Mingming Cao, Andreas Dilger, Alex Zhuravlev (Tomas), Dave Kleikamp, Theodore Ts'o, Eric Sandeen, Sam Naghshineh, others |
---|---|
Full name | Fourth extended file system |
Introduced | 10 October 2006 with Linux 2.6.19 |
Preceded by | ext3 |
Partition IDs | 0x83: MBR / EBR. EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7: GPT Windows BDP.[1] |
Structures | |
Directory contents | Linked list, hashed B-tree |
File allocation | Extents / Bitmap |
Bad blocks | Table |
Limits | |
Max volume size | 1 EiB |
Max file size | 16-256 TiB (for 4-64 KiB block size) |
Max no. of files | 4 billion (specified at filesystem creation time) |
Max filename length | 255 bytes (fewer for multibyte character encodings such as Unicode) |
Allowed filename characters | All bytes except NULL ('\0') and '/' and the special file names "." and ".." which are not forbidden but are always used for a respective special purpose. |
Features | |
Dates recorded | modification (mtime), data or attribute modification (ctime), access (atime), delete (dtime), create (crtime) |
Date range | 14 December 1901 - 10 May 2446[3] |
Date resolution | Nanosecond |
Forks | No |
Attributes | acl, bh, bsddf, commit=nrsec, data=journal, data=ordered, data=writeback, delalloc, extents, journal_dev, mballoc, minixdf, noacl, nobh, nodelalloc, noextents, nomballoc, nombcache, nouser_xattr, oldalloc, orlov, user_xattr |
File system permissions | Unix permissions, POSIX ACLs |
Transparent compression | No |
Transparent encryption | Yes |
Data deduplication | No |
Other | |
Supported operating systems |
ext4 was initially a series of backward-compatible extensions to ext3, many of them originally developed by Cluster File Systems for the Lustre file system between 2003 and 2006, meant to extend storage limits and add other performance improvements.[4] However, other Linux kernel developers opposed accepting extensions to ext3 for stability reasons,[5] and proposed to fork the source code of ext3, rename it as ext4, and perform all the development there, without affecting existing ext3 users. This proposal was accepted, and on 28 June 2006, Theodore Ts'o, the ext3 maintainer, announced the new plan of development for ext4.[6]
A preliminary development version of ext4 was included in version 2.6.19[7] of the Linux kernel. On 11 October 2008, the patches that mark ext4 as stable code were merged in the Linux 2.6.28 source code repositories,[8] denoting the end of the development phase and recommending ext4 adoption. Kernel 2.6.28, containing the ext4 filesystem, was finally released on 25 December 2008.[9] On 15 January 2010, Google announced that it would upgrade its storage infrastructure from ext2 to ext4.[10] On 14 December 2010, Google also announced it would use ext4, instead of YAFFS, on Android 2.3.[11]
ext4 is the default file system for many Linux distributions including Debian and Ubuntu.[12]
This section needs additional citations for verification. (May 2024) |
^extent
, ^flex_bg
, ^huge_file
, ^uninit_bg
, ^dir_nlink
, and ^extra_isize
.[16]fallocate()
, a new system call in the Linux kernel, can be used. The allocated space would be guaranteed and likely contiguous. This situation has applications for media streaming and databases.[citation needed]large_dir
feature enabled a 3-level HTree and directory sizes over 2 GB, allowing approximately 6 billion entries in a single directory.This section needs expansion with: How metadata checksum is done? The explanation needs to be easily understandable by non-technical readers. You can help by adding to it. (May 2024) |
statx()
API.[23]
In 2008, the principal developer of the ext3 and ext4 file systems, Theodore Ts'o, stated that although ext4 has improved features, it is not a major advance, it uses old technology, and is a stop-gap. Ts'o believes that Btrfs is the better direction because "it offers improvements in scalability, reliability, and ease of management".[29] Btrfs also has "a number of the same design ideas that reiser3/4 had".[30] However, ext4 has continued to gain new features such as file encryption and metadata checksums.
The ext4 file system does not honor the "secure deletion" file attribute, which is supposed to cause overwriting of files upon deletion. A patch to implement secure deletion was proposed in 2011, but did not solve the problem of sensitive data ending up in the file-system journal.[31]
Because delayed allocation changes the behavior that programmers have been relying on with ext3, the feature poses some additional risk of data loss in cases where the system crashes or loses power before all of the data has been written to disk. Due to this, ext4 in kernel versions 2.6.30 and later automatically handles these cases as ext3 does.
The typical scenario in which this might occur is a program replacing the contents of a file without forcing a write to the disk with fsync. There are two common ways of replacing the contents of a file on Unix systems:[32]
fd=open("file", O_TRUNC); write(fd, data); close(fd);
O_TRUNC
flag), then new data is written out. Since the write can take some time, there is an opportunity of losing contents even with ext3, but usually very small. However, because ext4 can delay writing file data for a long time, this opportunity is much greater.fd=open("file.new"); write(fd, data); close(fd); rename("file.new", "file");
rename()
call is guaranteed to be atomic by POSIX standards – i.e. either the old file remains, or it's overwritten with the new one. Because the ext3 default "ordered" journaling mode guarantees file data is written out on disk before metadata, this technique guarantees that either the old or the new file contents will persist on disk. ext4's delayed allocation breaks this expectation, because the file write can be delayed for a long time, and the rename is usually carried out before new file contents reach the disk.Using fsync()
more often to reduce the risk for ext4 could lead to performance penalties on ext3 filesystems mounted with the data=ordered
flag (the default on most Linux distributions). Given that both file systems will be in use for some time, this complicates matters for end-user application developers. In response, ext4 in Linux kernels 2.6.30 and newer detect the occurrence of these common cases and force the files to be allocated immediately. For a small cost in performance, this provides semantics similar to ext3 ordered mode and increases the chance that either version of the file will survive the crash. This new behavior is enabled by default, but can be disabled with the "noauto_da_alloc" mount option.[32]
The new patches have become part of the mainline kernel 2.6.30, but various distributions chose to backport them to 2.6.28 or 2.6.29.[33]
These patches don't completely prevent potential data loss or help at all with new files. The only way to be safe is to write and use software that does fsync()
when it needs to. Performance problems can be minimized by limiting crucial disk writes that need fsync()
to occur less frequently.[34]
Linux kernel Virtual File System is a subsystem or layer inside of the Linux kernel. It is the result of an attempt to integrate multiple file systems into an orderly single structure. The key idea, which dates back to the pioneering work done by Sun Microsystems employees in 1986,[35] is to abstract out that part of the file system that is common to all file systems and put that code in a separate layer that calls the underlying concrete file systems to actually manage the data.
All system calls related to files (or pseudo files) are directed to the Linux kernel Virtual File System for initial processing. These calls, coming from user processes, are the standard POSIX calls, such as open
, read
, write
, lseek
, etc.
Currently, ext4 has full support on non-Linux operating systems.
Microsoft Windows can access ext4 since Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 20211.[36][37][38] It is possible thanks to Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) which was introduced with Windows 10 Anniversary Update (version 1607) on 2 August 2016. WSL is available only in 64-bit versions of Windows 10 from version 1607. It is also available in Windows Server 2019. Big changes to the WSL architecture came with the release of WSL 2 on 12 June 2019.[39] WSL 2 requires Windows 10 version 1903 or higher, with build 18362 or higher, for x64 systems, and version 2004 or higher, with build 19041 or higher, for ARM64 systems.[40]
Paragon offers its commercial product Linux File Systems for Windows[41] which allows read/write capabilities for ext2/3/4 on Windows 7 SP1/8/8.1/10 and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1/2012/2016.
macOS has full ext2/3/4 read–write capability through the extFS for Mac by Paragon Software,[42] which is a commercial product. Free software such as ext4fuse has read-only support with limited functionality.