City of Durham is a constituency[n 1] represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2019 by Mary Kelly Foy of the Labour Party.[n 2]
City of Durham | |
---|---|
County constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | County Durham |
Population | 94,375 (2011 census)[1] |
Electorate | 72,878 (2023) [2] |
Major settlements | Durham, Brandon, Coxhoe, Bowburn, Framwellgate Moor, Sherburn and Ushaw Moor |
Current constituency | |
Created | 1918 |
Member of Parliament | Mary Kelly Foy (Labour) |
Seats | One |
1885–1918 | |
Seats | One |
Type of constituency | Borough constituency |
1678–1885 | |
Seats | Two |
Type of constituency | Borough constituency |
Constituency profile
The constituency contains a large minority of students, researchers and academics at the early 19th century founded University of Durham,[n 3] that has a claim towards being the third oldest in England and has elected Labour MPs since 1935, although there have been strong SDP–Liberal Alliance and Liberal Democrat challenges to Labour since the 1980s.
The constituency includes a number of surrounding villages and suburbs as well as Durham itself, the largest of these are Brandon, Bowburn, Esh Winning, Framwellgate Moor, Sherburn, Ushaw Moor and Willington. The seat extends as far west as Satley and as far east as Shadforth.
The seat has traditionally been dominated by Labour, with support particularly strong in those villages historically connected to County Durham's mining industry. Durham is famous as an educational centre, for Durham University and the feepaying preparatory school, Chorister School where Tony Blair was educated. The city centre is more inclined to the Liberal Democrats. Like many other university cities such as Cambridge and Oxford, in the 2005 election it swung strongly towards the Liberal Democrats, one possible reason being these cities' sizeable student population who were viewed as being hostile to Labour's policies on areas such as top-up fees and the Iraq War. The Liberal Democrats were able to reduce Labour's majority by over 10,000 votes, although they were still unable to gain the seat from Labour, as was the case in the 2010 election. As reflected in throughout the country, the Liberal Democrat vote collapsed in the 2015 election.
History
The parliamentary borough (1678–1918)
The City of Durham was first given the right to return Members to Parliament by an Act of Parliament in 1673, although the first election was not held until 1678 due to drafting errors.[3] It was the last new borough but one to be enfranchised before the Great Reform Act of 1832.[4] It was the only borough in County Durham, the county also having been unrepresented until the same Act of Parliament, which created two MPs for the county and two for the city. Both constituencies were frequently referred to simply as Durham, which can make for some confusion.
The constituency as constituted in 1678 consisted only of the city of Durham itself, though this included its suburbs which were within the municipal boundary. The right to vote was held by the corporation and the freemen of the city, many of whom were not resident within the boundaries. Unlike the situation in many small rotten boroughs, the corporation had no jurisdiction over the creation of freemen: freemen were generally created by connection with companies of trade, either by apprenticeship or by birth (by being the son of an existing freeman), though the common council of the city had a power to create honorary freemen.
The creation of honorary freemen with the specific intention of swaying elections was a common abuse in a number of boroughs in the 18th century, and at the Durham election of 1762 became sufficiently controversial to force a change in the law. The election was disputed because 215 new freemen, most of them not resident in the city, had been made after the writ for the election was issued. The existing freemen petitioned against this dilution of their voting rights, the candidate who had been declared elected was unseated by the Commons committee which heard the case, and the following year an Act of Parliament was passed to prevent any honorary freeman from voting in a borough election within twelve months of their being accorded that status.
Through having a freeman franchise the electorate was comparatively numerous for the period, though comprising only a small fraction of the city's population; at the time of the Reform Act there were between 1,100 and 1,200 freemen in total, of whom 427 were resident and 558 lived within seven miles, while the total population of the borough was 9,269. The Lambton and Tempest families were influential, and were generally able to secure election, but fell far short of the sort of control common in pocket boroughs.
The city retained both its MPs under the 1832 Reform Act, with its boundaries adjusted only very slightly, although as elsewhere the franchise was reformed. The Reform Act 1867 extended the boundaries to include part of Framwellgate parish which had previously been excluded.[5] Under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, the borough's representation was reduced from the 1885 general election to a single MP.[6] In the boundary changes of 1918, the borough was abolished, but a division of County Durham was named after the city.
County constituency (since 1918)
From 1918, Durham City was included in a county constituency officially called The Durham Division of (County) Durham, consisting of the central part of the county.[7] In the 1983 boundary changes, the constituency officially acquired the unambiguous City of Durham name for the first time and its boundaries were realigned to match the new City of Durham local government district.
Boundaries
1918–1950
- the Borough of Durham
- the Urban District of Hetton
- the Rural District of Durham except the parish of Brancepeth
- in the Rural District of Houghton-le-Spring, the parishes of East Rainton, Great Eppleton, Little Eppleton, Moor House, Moorsley, and West Rainton.[7]
As well as absorbing the abolished parliamentary borough, the reconstituted seat included Hetton-le-Hole and surrounding rural areas, transferred from Houghton-le-Spring, and northern areas of the abolished Mid Division of Durham.
1950–1974
- the Borough of Durham
- the Urban Districts of Hetton and Spennymoor
- the Rural District of Durham.[8]
Spennymoor and the parish of Brancepeth transferred in from the abolished constituency of Spennymoor. Other minor changes (the Rural District of Houghton-le-Spring had been abolished and absorbed into neighbouring local authorities).
1974–1983
- the Borough of Durham and Framwelgate
- the Rural District of Sedgefield and the Rural District of Durham except the parish of Brancepeth.[9]
Hetton transferred back to Houghton-le-Spring, and Spennymoor and Brancepeth now included in Durham North West. Gained the Rural District of Sedgefield from the abolished constituency of Sedgefield.
1983–2024
Sedgefield returned to the re-established constituency thereof. Gained the area comprising the former Urban District of Brandon and Byshottles which had been absorbed into the District of the City of Durham, previously part of North West Durham.
2024–present
- The County of Durham electoral districts of: Belmont; Brandon; Deerness; Durham South; Elvet and Gilesgate; Esh and Witton Gilbert; Framwellgate and Newton Hall; Neville's Cross; Sherburn; and Willington and Hunwick.[13]
- Coxhoe was transferred to the new constituency of Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor, offset by gains from the abolished constituency of North West Durham, including the communities of Esh and Willington.
Members of Parliament
Durham City (borough)
- Constituency created 1678
MPs 1678–1885
MPs 1885–1918
Election | Member[14][33] | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | Thomas Milvain | Conservative | |
1892 | Matthew Fowler | Liberal | |
1898 by-election | Arthur Elliot | Liberal Unionist | |
1906 | John Hills | Liberal Unionist | |
1918 | Parliamentary borough abolished |
Durham, Durham/City of Durham (county constituency)
MPs since 1918
Elections
Elections in the 2020s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mary Kelly Foy | 19,131 | 47.1 | +6.2 | |
Reform UK | Mark Belch | 7,374 | 18.2 | +11.6 | |
Liberal Democrats | Mark Wilkes | 5,920 | 14.6 | −2.3 | |
Conservative | Luke Holmes | 5,221 | 12.9 | −19.0 | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer | 2,803 | 6.9 | +3.6 | |
SDP | Sarah Welbourne | 178 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 11,757 | 28.9 | |||
Turnout | 40,627 | 58.5 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Elections in the 2010s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mary Kelly Foy | 20,531 | 42.0 | –13.4 | |
Conservative | William Morgan | 15,506 | 31.7 | +1.9 | |
Liberal Democrats | Amanda Hopgood | 7,935 | 16.2 | +6.3 | |
Brexit Party | Lesley Wright | 3,252 | 6.7 | N/A | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer | 1,635 | 3.3 | +1.7 | |
Majority | 5,025 | 10.3 | –15.3 | ||
Turnout | 48,859 | 68.6 | +0.7 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | –7.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 26,772 | 55.4 | +8.1 | |
Conservative | Richard Lawrie | 14,408 | 29.8 | +7.6 | |
Liberal Democrats | Amanda Hopgood | 4,787 | 9.9 | –1.4 | |
UKIP | Malcolm Bint | 1,116 | 2.3 | –9.1 | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer | 797 | 1.6 | –4.3 | |
Independent | Jim Clark | 399 | 0.8 | N/A | |
Young People's | Jon Collings | 45 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 12,364 | 25.6 | +0.5 | ||
Turnout | 48,324 | 67.9 | +1.4 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | +0.25 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 21,596 | 47.3 | +3.0 | |
Conservative | Rebecca Coulson[42] | 10,157 | 22.2 | +8.9 | |
UKIP | Liam Clark | 5,232 | 11.4 | +9.5 | |
Liberal Democrats | Craig Martin[43] | 5,183 | 11.3 | −26.4 | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer[44] | 2,687 | 5.9 | N/A | |
Independent | John Marshall[45] | 649 | 1.4 | N/A | |
Independent | Jon Collings | 195 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 11,439 | 25.1 | +18.5 | ||
Turnout | 45,699 | 66.5 | –0.7 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −3.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 20,496 | 44.3 | −2.9 | |
Liberal Democrats | Carol Woods | 17,429 | 37.7 | −2.1 | |
Conservative | Nick Varley | 6,146 | 13.3 | +3.9 | |
BNP | Ralph Musgrave | 1,153 | 2.5 | N/A | |
UKIP | Nigel Coghill-Marshall | 856 | 1.9 | N/A | |
Independent | Jon Collings | 172 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 3,067 | 6.6 | −0.8 | ||
Turnout | 46,252 | 67.2 | +5.1 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −0.4 |
Elections in the 2000s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 20,928 | 47.2 | −8.9 | |
Liberal Democrats | Carol Woods | 17,654 | 39.8 | +16.1 | |
Conservative | Ben Rogers | 4,179 | 9.4 | −7.9 | |
Veritas | Tony Martin | 1,603 | 3.6 | N/A | |
Majority | 3,274 | 7.4 | −25.0 | ||
Turnout | 44,364 | 62.1 | +2.5 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −12.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 23,254 | 56.1 | −7.2 | |
Liberal Democrats | Carol Woods | 9,813 | 23.7 | +8.4 | |
Conservative | Nick Cartmell | 7,167 | 17.3 | −0.2 | |
UKIP | Chris Williamson | 1,252 | 3.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 13,441 | 32.4 | −13.4 | ||
Turnout | 41,486 | 59.6 | −11.2 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1990s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 31,102 | 63.3 | +10.0 | |
Conservative | Richard Chalk | 8,598 | 17.5 | −6.2 | |
Liberal Democrats | Nigel Martin | 7,499 | 15.3 | −6.2 | |
Referendum | Margaret Robson | 1,723 | 3.5 | N/A | |
Natural Law | Paul Kember | 213 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 22,504 | 45.8 | +16.2 | ||
Turnout | 49,135 | 70.8 | −3.8 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | +8.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 27,095 | 53.3 | +8.4 | |
Conservative | Martin I. Woodroofe | 12,037 | 23.7 | +1.8 | |
Liberal Democrats | Nigel Martin | 10,915 | 21.5 | −11.7 | |
Green | Jane Banks | 812 | 1.6 | N/A | |
Majority | 15,058 | 29.6 | +17.9 | ||
Turnout | 50,859 | 74.6 | −3.6 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1980s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 23,382 | 44.9 | +8.4 | |
SDP | David Stoker | 17,257 | 33.2 | +0.7 | |
Conservative | Gordon Colquhoun | 11,408 | 21.9 | −9.1 | |
Majority | 6,125 | 11.7 | +7.7 | ||
Turnout | 52,047 | 78.2 | +3.8 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | +3.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 18,163 | 36.5 | ||
SDP | David Stoker | 16,190 | 32.5 | ||
Conservative | Matthew Lavis | 15,438 | 31.0 | ||
Majority | 1,973 | 4.0 | |||
Turnout | 49,791 | 74.4 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1970s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 30,903 | 52.3 | −6.1 | |
Conservative | Matthew Lavis | 19,666 | 33.3 | +9.6 | |
Liberal | Chris Foote Wood | 8,572 | 14.5 | −2.3 | |
Majority | 11,237 | 19.0 | −15.7 | ||
Turnout | 59,141 | 76.4 | +4.8 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 31,305 | 58.5 | +6.0 | |
Conservative | Derek Conway | 13,189 | 24.7 | −2.4 | |
Liberal | Alan Heesom | 9,011 | 16.8 | −1.7 | |
Majority | 18,116 | 33.9 | +8.5 | ||
Turnout | 53,505 | 71.6 | −9.2 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 31,405 | 52.5 | ||
Conservative | Timothy Kirkhope | 16,202 | 27.1 | ||
Liberal | Alan Heesom | 12,235 | 20.5 | ||
Majority | 15,203 | 25.4 | |||
Turnout | 59,842 | 80.8 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 33,766 | 66.9 | −0.7 | |
Conservative | Ernest Greenwood | 16,707 | 33.1 | +3.7 | |
Majority | 17,059 | 33.8 | −4.1 | ||
Turnout | 50,473 | 73.3 | −1.4 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1960s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 32,200 | 70.6 | +2.3 | |
Conservative | Richard Yorke | 13,383 | 29.4 | −2.3 | |
Majority | 18,817 | 41.2 | +4.6 | ||
Turnout | 45,583 | 74.7 | −4.1 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 32,818 | 68.3 | +1.9 | |
Conservative | Joseph Whittaker | 15,209 | 31.7 | −1.9 | |
Majority | 17,609 | 36.7 | +3.8 | ||
Turnout | 48,027 | 78.8 | −3.0 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1950s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 33,795 | 66.4 | +0.3 | |
Conservative | Charles MacCarthy | 17,106 | 33.6 | −0.3 | |
Majority | 16,689 | 32.8 | +0.7 | ||
Turnout | 50,901 | 81.8 | +2.3 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 32,412 | 66.1 | −1.0 | |
Conservative | Charles P. MacCarthy | 16,640 | 33.9 | +1.0 | |
Majority | 15,772 | 32.2 | +2.0 | ||
Turnout | 49,052 | 79.5 | −6.6 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 35,597 | 67.1 | −1.0 | |
Conservative | Robert Fisher | 17,447 | 32.9 | +1.0 | |
Majority | 18,150 | 34.2 | −2.0 | ||
Turnout | 53,044 | 86.1 | −0.9 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 36,024 | 68.1 | ||
Conservative | Henry Laslett | 16,903 | 31.9 | ||
Majority | 19,121 | 36.2 | |||
Turnout | 52,927 | 87.0 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Election in the 1940s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 24,135 | 66.2 | +7.1 | |
National Liberal | John Bunyan | 12,331 | 33.8 | −7.1 | |
Majority | 11,804 | 32.4 | +14.3 | ||
Turnout | 36,466 | 79.8 | −5.4 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1930s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 21,517 | 59.1 | +9.5 | |
National Liberal | William McKeag | 14,910 | 40.9 | N/A | |
Majority | 6,607 | 18.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 36,427 | 85.2 | +1.5 | ||
Labour gain from Liberal | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William McKeag | 17,406 | 50.4 | +28.1 | |
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 17,136 | 49.6 | −7.2 | |
Majority | 270 | 0.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 34,542 | 83.7 | N/A | ||
Liberal gain from Labour | Swing |
Elections in the 1920s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 18,514 | 56.8 | +1.9 | |
Liberal | William McKeag | 7,266 | 22.3 | +12.3 | |
Unionist | George Hamilton-Fletcher | 6,820 | 20.9 | −14.2 | |
Majority | 11,248 | 34.5 | +14.7 | ||
Turnout | 32,600 | 80.1 | −5.1 | ||
Registered electors | 40,676 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | −5.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 15,032 | 54.9 | −1.9 | |
Unionist | Sidney Streatfeild | 9,614 | 35.1 | −8.1 | |
Liberal | William McKeag | 2,747 | 10.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 5,418 | 19.8 | +6.2 | ||
Turnout | 27,393 | 85.2 | +8.0 | ||
Registered electors | 32,163 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | +3.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 13,819 | 56.8 | +1.6 | |
Unionist | Thomas Bradford | 10,530 | 43.2 | −1.6 | |
Majority | 3,289 | 13.6 | +3.2 | ||
Turnout | 24,349 | 77.2 | −4.7 | ||
Registered electors | 31,523 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | +1.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 14,068 | 55.2 | +5.8 | |
Unionist | John Hills | 11,396 | 44.8 | −5.8 | |
Majority | 2,672 | 10.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 25,464 | 81.9 | +20.5 | ||
Registered electors | 31,104 | ||||
Labour gain from Unionist | Swing | +1.8 |
Elections in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | John Hills | 9,027 | 50.6 | |
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 8,809 | 49.4 | ||
Majority | 218 | 1.2 | |||
Turnout | 17,836 | 61.4 | |||
Unionist hold | Swing | ||||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Hills | 1,313 | 60.0 | ||
Liberal | Cecil Cochrane | 877 | 40.0 | ||
Majority | 436 | 20.0 | |||
Turnout | 2,190 | 84.2 | |||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Hills | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Hills | 1,313 | 59.9 | −1.6 | |
Free Trader | Arthur Elliot[n 4] | 880 | 40.1 | +1.6 | |
Majority | 433 | 19.8 | −3.2 | ||
Turnout | 2,193 | 85.0 | +7.1 | ||
Registered electors | 2,580 | ||||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Arthur Elliot | 1,250 | 61.5 | +11.6 | |
Liberal | William Geary | 781 | 38.5 | −11.6 | |
Majority | 469 | 23.0 | +22.8 | ||
Turnout | 2,031 | 77.9 | −11.4 | ||
Registered electors | 2,607 | ||||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +11.4 |
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Arthur Elliot | 1,167 | 51.4 | +1.5 | |
Liberal | H.F. Boyd | 1,102 | 48.6 | −1.5 | |
Majority | 65 | 2.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,269 | 89.1 | −0.2 | ||
Registered electors | 2,548 | ||||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +1.5 |
- Caused by Fowler's death.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Matthew Fowler | 1,110 | 50.1 | −1.7 | |
Liberal Unionist | Arthur Elliot | 1,107 | 49.9 | +1.7 | |
Majority | 3 | 0.2 | −3.4 | ||
Turnout | 2,217 | 89.3 | −0.1 | ||
Registered electors | 2,482 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −1.7 |
- These are the final 1895 results after a recount. The original result was Fowler with 1,111 votes, and Elliot with 1,110 votes, leaving a Liberal majority of just one vote.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Matthew Fowler | 1,075 | 51.8 | +8.7 | |
Conservative | Thomas Milvain | 1,000 | 48.2 | −8.7 | |
Majority | 75 | 3.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,075 | 89.4 | +3.2 | ||
Registered electors | 2,322 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +8.7 |
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Milvain | 1,129 | 56.9 | +4.0 | |
Liberal | George Brooks[57] | 855 | 43.1 | −4.0 | |
Majority | 274 | 13.8 | +8.0 | ||
Turnout | 1,984 | 86.2 | −5.3 | ||
Registered electors | 2,302 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −4.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Milvain | 1,114 | 52.9 | ||
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 993 | 47.1 | ||
Majority | 121 | 5.8 | |||
Turnout | 2,107 | 91.5 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Farrer Herschell | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
- Caused by Herschell's appointment as Solicitor General for England and Wales
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 1,237 | 35.9 | +1.0 | |
Liberal | Farrer Herschell | 1,152 | 33.4 | +0.2 | |
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 1,058 | 30.7 | −1.2 | |
Majority | 94 | 2.7 | +1.4 | ||
Turnout | 2,295 (est) | 97.6 (est) | +12.7 | ||
Registered electors | 2,352 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Farrer Herschell | 930 | 27.8 | −7.1 | |
Liberal | Arthur Monck[n 5] | 918 | 27.5 | −5.7 | |
Conservative | Francis Duncan | 752 | 22.5 | +6.5 | |
Conservative | Francis Barrington | 742 | 22.2 | +6.2 | |
Majority | 166 | 5.0 | +3.7 | ||
Turnout | 1,671 (est) | 81.2 (est) | −3.7 | ||
Registered electors | 2,059 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | -6.8 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | -6.0 |
- Caused by the 1874 election being declared void on petition.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 924 | 34.9 | +1.4 | |
Liberal | John Henderson | 879 | 33.2 | −2.0 | |
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 846 | 31.9 | +0.6 | |
Majority | 33 | 1.3 | −0.9 | ||
Turnout | 1,748 (est) | 84.9 (est) | −2.5 | ||
Registered electors | 2,059 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.6 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | -1.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 814 | 51.2 | +19.9 | |
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 776 | 48.8 | −19.9 | |
Majority | 38 | 2.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,590 | 81.7 | −5.7 | ||
Registered electors | 1,946 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +19.9 |
- Caused by Davison's death.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Robert Davison | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
- Caused by Davison's appointment as Judge Advocate General of the Armed Forces.
Elections in the 1860s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Henderson | 823 | 35.2 | ||
Liberal | John Robert Davison | 784 | 33.5 | ||
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 732 | 31.3 | ||
Turnout | 1,536 (est) | 87.4 (est) | |||
Majority | 89 | 3.9 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
Majority | 52 | 2.2 | |||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Caused by Mowbray's appointment as Judge Advocate General of the Armed Forces
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Henderson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,056 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Henderson | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
- Caused by Atherton's death.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
- Caused by Atherton's appointment as Attorney General for England and Wales.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
- Caused by Atherton's appointment as Solicitor General for England and Wales.
Elections in the 1850s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,147 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Caused by Mowbray's appointment as Judge Advocate General of the Armed Forces.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,184 | ||||
Radical hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Radical |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | 529 | 54.4 | +22.5 | |
Whig | Charles Eurwicke Douglas[60][61] | 444 | 45.6 | −22.6 | |
Majority | 85 | 8.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 973 | 88.9 | −1.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,094 | ||||
Void election result | Swing | +22.6 |
- Caused by the earlier by-election being declared void on petition due to bribery.[62]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Adolphus Vane-Tempest | 545 | 52.4 | +20.5 | |
Whig | Henry Fenwick[63][64][65] | 496 | 47.6 | −20.6 | |
Majority | 49 | 4.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,041 | 95.2 | +4.8 | ||
Registered electors | 1,094 | ||||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +20.6 |
- Caused by Granger's death.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 571 | 36.0 | −2.0 | |
Radical | William Atherton | 510 | 32.2 | −1.0 | |
Conservative | Adolphus Vane-Tempest | 506 | 31.9 | +3.1 | |
Majority | 4 | 0.3 | −4.5 | ||
Turnout | 1,047 (est) | 90.4 (est) | +3.7 | ||
Registered electors | 1,157 | ||||
Radical hold | Swing | −1.8 | |||
Radical gain from Whig | Swing | −1.3 |
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 595 | 38.0 | ||
Whig | Henry John Spearman | 519 | 33.2 | ||
Conservative | David Edward Wood[66] | 450 | 28.8 | ||
Turnout | 1,007 (est) | 86.7 (est) | |||
Majority | 76 | 4.8 | |||
Radical hold | |||||
Majority | 69 | 4.4 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | John Bright | 488 | 54.3 | ||
Conservative | Thomas Purvis | 410 | 45.7 | ||
Majority | 78 | 8.6 | |||
Turnout | 898 | 81.2 | |||
Radical gain from Conservative |
- Caused by the by-election being declared void on petition due to bribery by Hill-Trevor's agents.[68]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 507 | 55.6 | ||
Radical | John Bright | 405 | 44.4 | ||
Majority | 102 | 11.2 | |||
Turnout | 912 | 82.5 | |||
Conservative hold |
- Caused by FitzRoy's appointment as Governor of New Zealand
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert FitzRoy | Unopposed | |||
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,022 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Radical gain from Conservative |
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 465 | 38.5 | +0.8 | |
Whig | William Charles Harland | 373 | 30.9 | −3.6 | |
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 371 | 30.7 | +2.8 | |
Turnout | 857 | 90.3 | −2.6 | ||
Registered electors | 949 | ||||
Majority | 92 | 7.6 | +4.4 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.2 | |||
Majority | 2 | 0.2 | −6.4 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −2.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 473 | 37.7 | +6.5 | |
Whig | William Charles Harland | 433 | 34.5 | −34.3 | |
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 350 | 27.9 | N/A | |
Turnout | 829 | 92.9 | −2.4 | ||
Registered electors | 892 | ||||
Majority | 40 | 3.2 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +20.4 | |||
Majority | 83 | 6.6 | +4.9 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −20.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Charles Harland | 440 | 35.9 | ||
Whig | William Chaytor | 404 | 32.9 | ||
Tory | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 383 | 31.2 | ||
Majority | 21 | 1.7 | |||
Turnout | 768 | 95.3 | |||
Registered electors | 806 | ||||
Whig win (new boundaries) | |||||
Whig win (new boundaries) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Chaytor | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Arthur Hill-Trevor | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | c. 1,200 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Chaytor | 495 | 51.1 | +13.9 | |
Tory | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 470 | 48.6 | +15.5 | |
Whig | John Clervaux Chaytor | 3 | 0.3 | −29.4 | |
Majority | 25 | 2.5 | −1.6 | ||
Turnout | 968 | c. 80.7 | |||
Registered electors | c. 1,200 | ||||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | −0.8 |
- Caused by Gresley being unseated on petition.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Michael Angelo Taylor | 546 | 37.2 | ||
Tory | Roger Gresley | 486 | 33.1 | ||
Whig | William Chaytor, Senior | 436 | 29.7 | ||
Turnout | 988 | ||||
Registered electors | |||||
Majority | 60 | 4.1 | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Majority | 50 | 3.4 | |||
Tory hold |
See also
Notes
- A county constituency (for the purposes of election expenses and type of returning officer)
- As with all constituencies, the constituency elects one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election at least every five years.
- In the 2001 Census 14.5% of those aged 16–74 were further education students and 2.4% were students aged 16 or 17 such as at a sixth form or college.
- Supported by the local Liberal association
- Monck changed his surname to Middleton in 1876
References
Sources
External links
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.