City of Durham (UK Parliament constituency)
Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1678 onwards From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1678 onwards From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
City of Durham is a constituency[n 1] represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2019 by Mary Kelly Foy of the Labour Party.[n 2]
City of Durham | |
---|---|
County constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | County Durham |
Population | 94,375 (2011 census)[1] |
Electorate | 72,878 (2023) [2] |
Major settlements | Durham, Brandon, Coxhoe, Bowburn, Framwellgate Moor, Sherburn and Ushaw Moor |
Current constituency | |
Created | 1918 |
Member of Parliament | Mary Kelly Foy (Labour) |
Seats | One |
1885–1918 | |
Seats | One |
Type of constituency | Borough constituency |
1678–1885 | |
Seats | Two |
Type of constituency | Borough constituency |
The constituency contains a large minority of students, researchers and academics at the early 19th century founded University of Durham,[n 3] that has a claim towards being the third oldest in England and has elected Labour MPs since 1935, although there have been strong SDP–Liberal Alliance and Liberal Democrat challenges to Labour since the 1980s.
The constituency includes a number of surrounding villages and suburbs as well as Durham itself, the largest of these are Brandon, Bowburn, Esh Winning, Framwellgate Moor, Sherburn, Ushaw Moor and Willington. The seat extends as far west as Satley and as far east as Shadforth.
The seat has traditionally been dominated by Labour, with support particularly strong in those villages historically connected to County Durham's mining industry. Durham is famous as an educational centre, for Durham University and the feepaying preparatory school, Chorister School where Tony Blair was educated. The city centre is more inclined to the Liberal Democrats. Like many other university cities such as Cambridge and Oxford, in the 2005 election it swung strongly towards the Liberal Democrats, one possible reason being these cities' sizeable student population who were viewed as being hostile to Labour's policies on areas such as top-up fees and the Iraq War. The Liberal Democrats were able to reduce Labour's majority by over 10,000 votes, although they were still unable to gain the seat from Labour, as was the case in the 2010 election. As reflected in throughout the country, the Liberal Democrat vote collapsed in the 2015 election.
The City of Durham was first given the right to return Members to Parliament by an act of Parliament[which?] in 1673, although the first election was not held until 1678 due to drafting errors.[3] It was the last new borough but one to be enfranchised before the Great Reform Act of 1832.[4] It was the only borough in County Durham, the county also having been unrepresented until the same act of Parliament,[which?] which created two MPs for the county and two for the city. Both constituencies were frequently referred to simply as Durham, which can make for some confusion.
The constituency as constituted in 1678 consisted only of the city of Durham itself, though this included its suburbs which were within the municipal boundary. The right to vote was held by the corporation and the freemen of the city, many of whom were not resident within the boundaries. Unlike the situation in many small rotten boroughs, the corporation had no jurisdiction over the creation of freemen: freemen were generally created by connection with companies of trade, either by apprenticeship or by birth (by being the son of an existing freeman), though the common council of the city had a power to create honorary freemen.
The creation of honorary freemen with the specific intention of swaying elections was a common abuse in a number of boroughs in the 18th century, and at the Durham election of 1762 became sufficiently controversial to force a change in the law. The election was disputed because 215 new freemen, most of them not resident in the city, had been made after the writ for the election was issued. The existing freemen petitioned against this dilution of their voting rights, the candidate who had been declared elected was unseated by the Commons committee which heard the case, and the following year the Freemen (Admission) Act 1763 (3 Geo. 3. c. 15) was passed to prevent any honorary freeman from voting in a borough election within twelve months of their being accorded that status.
Through having a freeman franchise the electorate was comparatively numerous for the period, though comprising only a small fraction of the city's population; at the time of the Reform Act there were between 1,100 and 1,200 freemen in total, of whom 427 were resident and 558 lived within seven miles, while the total population of the borough was 9,269. The Lambton and Tempest families were influential, and were generally able to secure election, but fell far short of the sort of control common in pocket boroughs.
The city retained both its MPs under the Reform Act 1832, with its boundaries adjusted only very slightly, although as elsewhere the franchise was reformed. The Reform Act 1867 extended the boundaries to include part of Framwellgate parish which had previously been excluded.[5] Under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, the borough's representation was reduced from the 1885 general election to a single MP.[6] In the boundary changes of 1918, the borough was abolished, but a division of County Durham was named after the city.
From 1918, Durham City was included in a county constituency officially called The Durham Division of (County) Durham, consisting of the central part of the county.[7] In the 1983 boundary changes, the constituency officially acquired the unambiguous City of Durham name for the first time and its boundaries were realigned to match the new City of Durham local government district.
As well as absorbing the abolished parliamentary borough, the reconstituted seat included Hetton-le-Hole and surrounding rural areas, transferred from Houghton-le-Spring, and northern areas of the abolished Mid Division of Durham.
Spennymoor and the parish of Brancepeth transferred in from the abolished constituency of Spennymoor. Other minor changes (the Rural District of Houghton-le-Spring had been abolished and absorbed into neighbouring local authorities).
Hetton transferred back to Houghton-le-Spring, and Spennymoor and Brancepeth now included in Durham North West. Gained the Rural District of Sedgefield from the abolished constituency of Sedgefield.
Sedgefield returned to the re-established constituency thereof. Gained the area comprising the former Urban District of Brandon and Byshottles which had been absorbed into the District of the City of Durham, previously part of North West Durham.
Election | Member[14][33] | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | Thomas Milvain | Conservative | |
1892 | Matthew Fowler | Liberal | |
1898 by-election | Arthur Elliot | Liberal Unionist | |
1906 | John Hills | Liberal Unionist | |
1918 | Parliamentary borough abolished |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mary Kelly Foy | 19,131 | 47.1 | +6.2 | |
Reform UK | Mark Belch | 7,374 | 18.2 | +11.6 | |
Liberal Democrats | Mark Wilkes | 5,920 | 14.6 | −2.3 | |
Conservative | Luke Holmes | 5,221 | 12.9 | −19.0 | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer | 2,803 | 6.9 | +3.6 | |
SDP | Sarah Welbourne | 178 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 11,757 | 28.9 | |||
Turnout | 40,627 | 58.5 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mary Kelly Foy | 20,531 | 42.0 | −13.4 | |
Conservative | William Morgan | 15,506 | 31.7 | +1.9 | |
Liberal Democrats | Amanda Hopgood | 7,935 | 16.2 | +6.3 | |
Brexit Party | Lesley Wright | 3,252 | 6.7 | N/A | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer | 1,635 | 3.3 | +1.7 | |
Majority | 5,025 | 10.3 | −15.3 | ||
Turnout | 48,859 | 68.6 | +0.7 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −7.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 26,772 | 55.4 | +8.1 | |
Conservative | Richard Lawrie | 14,408 | 29.8 | +7.6 | |
Liberal Democrats | Amanda Hopgood | 4,787 | 9.9 | −1.4 | |
UKIP | Malcolm Bint | 1,116 | 2.3 | −9.1 | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer | 797 | 1.6 | −4.3 | |
Independent | Jim Clark | 399 | 0.8 | N/A | |
Young People's | Jon Collings | 45 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 12,364 | 25.6 | +0.5 | ||
Turnout | 48,324 | 67.9 | +1.4 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | +0.25 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 21,596 | 47.3 | +3.0 | |
Conservative | Rebecca Coulson[42] | 10,157 | 22.2 | +8.9 | |
UKIP | Liam Clark | 5,232 | 11.4 | +9.5 | |
Liberal Democrats | Craig Martin[43] | 5,183 | 11.3 | −26.4 | |
Green | Jonathan Elmer[44] | 2,687 | 5.9 | N/A | |
Independent | John Marshall[45] | 649 | 1.4 | N/A | |
Independent | Jon Collings | 195 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 11,439 | 25.1 | +18.5 | ||
Turnout | 45,699 | 66.5 | −0.7 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −3.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 20,496 | 44.3 | −2.9 | |
Liberal Democrats | Carol Woods | 17,429 | 37.7 | −2.1 | |
Conservative | Nick Varley | 6,146 | 13.3 | +3.9 | |
BNP | Ralph Musgrave | 1,153 | 2.5 | N/A | |
UKIP | Nigel Coghill-Marshall | 856 | 1.9 | N/A | |
Independent | Jon Collings | 172 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 3,067 | 6.6 | −0.8 | ||
Turnout | 46,252 | 67.2 | +5.1 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −0.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roberta Blackman-Woods | 20,928 | 47.2 | −8.9 | |
Liberal Democrats | Carol Woods | 17,654 | 39.8 | +16.1 | |
Conservative | Ben Rogers | 4,179 | 9.4 | −7.9 | |
Veritas | Tony Martin | 1,603 | 3.6 | N/A | |
Majority | 3,274 | 7.4 | −25.0 | ||
Turnout | 44,364 | 62.1 | +2.5 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −12.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 23,254 | 56.1 | −7.2 | |
Liberal Democrats | Carol Woods | 9,813 | 23.7 | +8.4 | |
Conservative | Nick Cartmell | 7,167 | 17.3 | −0.2 | |
UKIP | Chris Williamson | 1,252 | 3.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 13,441 | 32.4 | −13.4 | ||
Turnout | 41,486 | 59.6 | −11.2 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 31,102 | 63.3 | +10.0 | |
Conservative | Richard Chalk | 8,598 | 17.5 | −6.2 | |
Liberal Democrats | Nigel Martin | 7,499 | 15.3 | −6.2 | |
Referendum | Margaret Robson | 1,723 | 3.5 | N/A | |
Natural Law | Paul Kember | 213 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 22,504 | 45.8 | +16.2 | ||
Turnout | 49,135 | 70.8 | −3.8 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | +8.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 27,095 | 53.3 | +8.4 | |
Conservative | Martin I. Woodroofe | 12,037 | 23.7 | +1.8 | |
Liberal Democrats | Nigel Martin | 10,915 | 21.5 | −11.7 | |
Green | Jane Banks | 812 | 1.6 | N/A | |
Majority | 15,058 | 29.6 | +17.9 | ||
Turnout | 50,859 | 74.6 | −3.6 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Gerry Steinberg | 23,382 | 44.9 | +8.4 | |
SDP | David Stoker | 17,257 | 33.2 | +0.7 | |
Conservative | Gordon Colquhoun | 11,408 | 21.9 | −9.1 | |
Majority | 6,125 | 11.7 | +7.7 | ||
Turnout | 52,047 | 78.2 | +3.8 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | +3.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 18,163 | 36.5 | ||
SDP | David Stoker | 16,190 | 32.5 | ||
Conservative | Matthew Lavis | 15,438 | 31.0 | ||
Majority | 1,973 | 4.0 | |||
Turnout | 49,791 | 74.4 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 30,903 | 52.3 | −6.1 | |
Conservative | Matthew Lavis | 19,666 | 33.3 | +9.6 | |
Liberal | Chris Foote Wood | 8,572 | 14.5 | −2.3 | |
Majority | 11,237 | 19.0 | −15.7 | ||
Turnout | 59,141 | 76.4 | +4.8 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 31,305 | 58.5 | +6.0 | |
Conservative | Derek Conway | 13,189 | 24.7 | −2.4 | |
Liberal | Alan Heesom | 9,011 | 16.8 | −1.7 | |
Majority | 18,116 | 33.9 | +8.5 | ||
Turnout | 53,505 | 71.6 | −9.2 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 31,405 | 52.5 | ||
Conservative | Timothy Kirkhope | 16,202 | 27.1 | ||
Liberal | Alan Heesom | 12,235 | 20.5 | ||
Majority | 15,203 | 25.4 | |||
Turnout | 59,842 | 80.8 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Mark Hughes | 33,766 | 66.9 | −0.7 | |
Conservative | Ernest Greenwood | 16,707 | 33.1 | +3.7 | |
Majority | 17,059 | 33.8 | −4.1 | ||
Turnout | 50,473 | 73.3 | −1.4 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 32,200 | 70.6 | +2.3 | |
Conservative | Richard Yorke | 13,383 | 29.4 | −2.3 | |
Majority | 18,817 | 41.2 | +4.6 | ||
Turnout | 45,583 | 74.7 | −4.1 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 32,818 | 68.3 | +1.9 | |
Conservative | Joseph Whittaker | 15,209 | 31.7 | −1.9 | |
Majority | 17,609 | 36.7 | +3.8 | ||
Turnout | 48,027 | 78.8 | −3.0 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 33,795 | 66.4 | +0.3 | |
Conservative | Charles MacCarthy | 17,106 | 33.6 | −0.3 | |
Majority | 16,689 | 32.8 | +0.7 | ||
Turnout | 50,901 | 81.8 | +2.3 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 32,412 | 66.1 | −1.0 | |
Conservative | Charles P. MacCarthy | 16,640 | 33.9 | +1.0 | |
Majority | 15,772 | 32.2 | +2.0 | ||
Turnout | 49,052 | 79.5 | −6.6 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 35,597 | 67.1 | −1.0 | |
Conservative | Robert Fisher | 17,447 | 32.9 | +1.0 | |
Majority | 18,150 | 34.2 | −2.0 | ||
Turnout | 53,044 | 86.1 | −0.9 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 36,024 | 68.1 | ||
Conservative | Henry Laslett | 16,903 | 31.9 | ||
Majority | 19,121 | 36.2 | |||
Turnout | 52,927 | 87.0 | |||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Charles Grey | 24,135 | 66.2 | +7.1 | |
National Liberal | John Bunyan | 12,331 | 33.8 | −7.1 | |
Majority | 11,804 | 32.4 | +14.3 | ||
Turnout | 36,466 | 79.8 | −5.4 | ||
Labour hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 21,517 | 59.1 | +9.5 | |
National Liberal | William McKeag | 14,910 | 40.9 | N/A | |
Majority | 6,607 | 18.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 36,427 | 85.2 | +1.5 | ||
Labour gain from Liberal | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William McKeag | 17,406 | 50.4 | +28.1 | |
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 17,136 | 49.6 | −7.2 | |
Majority | 270 | 0.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 34,542 | 83.7 | N/A | ||
Liberal gain from Labour | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 18,514 | 56.8 | +1.9 | |
Liberal | William McKeag | 7,266 | 22.3 | +12.3 | |
Unionist | George Hamilton-Fletcher | 6,820 | 20.9 | −14.2 | |
Majority | 11,248 | 34.5 | +14.7 | ||
Turnout | 32,600 | 80.1 | −5.1 | ||
Registered electors | 40,676 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | −5.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 15,032 | 54.9 | −1.9 | |
Unionist | Sidney Streatfeild | 9,614 | 35.1 | −8.1 | |
Liberal | William McKeag | 2,747 | 10.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 5,418 | 19.8 | +6.2 | ||
Turnout | 27,393 | 85.2 | +8.0 | ||
Registered electors | 32,163 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | +3.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 13,819 | 56.8 | +1.6 | |
Unionist | Thomas Bradford | 10,530 | 43.2 | −1.6 | |
Majority | 3,289 | 13.6 | +3.2 | ||
Turnout | 24,349 | 77.2 | −4.7 | ||
Registered electors | 31,523 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | +1.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 14,068 | 55.2 | +5.8 | |
Unionist | John Hills | 11,396 | 44.8 | −5.8 | |
Majority | 2,672 | 10.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 25,464 | 81.9 | +20.5 | ||
Registered electors | 31,104 | ||||
Labour gain from Unionist | Swing | +1.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | John Hills | 9,027 | 50.6 | |
Labour | Joshua Ritson | 8,809 | 49.4 | ||
Majority | 218 | 1.2 | |||
Turnout | 17,836 | 61.4 | |||
Unionist hold | Swing | ||||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Hills | 1,313 | 60.0 | ||
Liberal | Cecil Cochrane | 877 | 40.0 | ||
Majority | 436 | 20.0 | |||
Turnout | 2,190 | 84.2 | |||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Hills | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | John Hills | 1,313 | 59.9 | −1.6 | |
Free Trader | Arthur Elliot[n 4] | 880 | 40.1 | +1.6 | |
Majority | 433 | 19.8 | −3.2 | ||
Turnout | 2,193 | 85.0 | +7.1 | ||
Registered electors | 2,580 | ||||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Arthur Elliot | 1,250 | 61.5 | +11.6 | |
Liberal | William Geary | 781 | 38.5 | −11.6 | |
Majority | 469 | 23.0 | +22.8 | ||
Turnout | 2,031 | 77.9 | −11.4 | ||
Registered electors | 2,607 | ||||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +11.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Arthur Elliot | 1,167 | 51.4 | +1.5 | |
Liberal | H.F. Boyd | 1,102 | 48.6 | −1.5 | |
Majority | 65 | 2.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,269 | 89.1 | −0.2 | ||
Registered electors | 2,548 | ||||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +1.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Matthew Fowler | 1,110 | 50.1 | −1.7 | |
Liberal Unionist | Arthur Elliot | 1,107 | 49.9 | +1.7 | |
Majority | 3 | 0.2 | −3.4 | ||
Turnout | 2,217 | 89.3 | −0.1 | ||
Registered electors | 2,482 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −1.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Matthew Fowler | 1,075 | 51.8 | +8.7 | |
Conservative | Thomas Milvain | 1,000 | 48.2 | −8.7 | |
Majority | 75 | 3.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,075 | 89.4 | +3.2 | ||
Registered electors | 2,322 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +8.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Milvain | 1,129 | 56.9 | +4.0 | |
Liberal | George Brooks[57] | 855 | 43.1 | −4.0 | |
Majority | 274 | 13.8 | +8.0 | ||
Turnout | 1,984 | 86.2 | −5.3 | ||
Registered electors | 2,302 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −4.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Milvain | 1,114 | 52.9 | ||
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 993 | 47.1 | ||
Majority | 121 | 5.8 | |||
Turnout | 2,107 | 91.5 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Farrer Herschell | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 1,237 | 35.9 | +1.0 | |
Liberal | Farrer Herschell | 1,152 | 33.4 | +0.2 | |
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 1,058 | 30.7 | −1.2 | |
Majority | 94 | 2.7 | +1.4 | ||
Turnout | 2,295 (est) | 97.6 (est) | +12.7 | ||
Registered electors | 2,352 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Farrer Herschell | 930 | 27.8 | −7.1 | |
Liberal | Arthur Monck[n 5] | 918 | 27.5 | −5.7 | |
Conservative | Francis Duncan | 752 | 22.5 | +6.5 | |
Conservative | Francis Barrington | 742 | 22.2 | +6.2 | |
Majority | 166 | 5.0 | +3.7 | ||
Turnout | 1,671 (est) | 81.2 (est) | −3.7 | ||
Registered electors | 2,059 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | -6.8 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | -6.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 924 | 34.9 | +1.4 | |
Liberal | John Henderson | 879 | 33.2 | −2.0 | |
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 846 | 31.9 | +0.6 | |
Majority | 33 | 1.3 | −0.9 | ||
Turnout | 1,748 (est) | 84.9 (est) | −2.5 | ||
Registered electors | 2,059 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.6 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | -1.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 814 | 51.2 | +19.9 | |
Liberal | Thomas Charles Thompson | 776 | 48.8 | −19.9 | |
Majority | 38 | 2.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,590 | 81.7 | −5.7 | ||
Registered electors | 1,946 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +19.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Robert Davison | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Henderson | 823 | 35.2 | ||
Liberal | John Robert Davison | 784 | 33.5 | ||
Conservative | John Lloyd Wharton | 732 | 31.3 | ||
Turnout | 1,536 (est) | 87.4 (est) | |||
Majority | 89 | 3.9 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
Majority | 52 | 2.2 | |||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Henderson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,056 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Henderson | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,147 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | William Atherton | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,184 | ||||
Radical hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Radical |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | 529 | 54.4 | +22.5 | |
Whig | Charles Eurwicke Douglas[60][61] | 444 | 45.6 | −22.6 | |
Majority | 85 | 8.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 973 | 88.9 | −1.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,094 | ||||
Void election result | Swing | +22.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Adolphus Vane-Tempest | 545 | 52.4 | +20.5 | |
Whig | Henry Fenwick[63][64][65] | 496 | 47.6 | −20.6 | |
Majority | 49 | 4.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,041 | 95.2 | +4.8 | ||
Registered electors | 1,094 | ||||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +20.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 571 | 36.0 | −2.0 | |
Radical | William Atherton | 510 | 32.2 | −1.0 | |
Conservative | Adolphus Vane-Tempest | 506 | 31.9 | +3.1 | |
Majority | 4 | 0.3 | −4.5 | ||
Turnout | 1,047 (est) | 90.4 (est) | +3.7 | ||
Registered electors | 1,157 | ||||
Radical hold | Swing | −1.8 | |||
Radical gain from Whig | Swing | −1.3 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 595 | 38.0 | ||
Whig | Henry John Spearman | 519 | 33.2 | ||
Conservative | David Edward Wood[66] | 450 | 28.8 | ||
Turnout | 1,007 (est) | 86.7 (est) | |||
Majority | 76 | 4.8 | |||
Radical hold | |||||
Majority | 69 | 4.4 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | John Bright | 488 | 54.3 | ||
Conservative | Thomas Purvis | 410 | 45.7 | ||
Majority | 78 | 8.6 | |||
Turnout | 898 | 81.2 | |||
Radical gain from Conservative |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 507 | 55.6 | ||
Radical | John Bright | 405 | 44.4 | ||
Majority | 102 | 11.2 | |||
Turnout | 912 | 82.5 | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert FitzRoy | Unopposed | |||
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,022 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Radical gain from Conservative |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 465 | 38.5 | +0.8 | |
Whig | William Charles Harland | 373 | 30.9 | −3.6 | |
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 371 | 30.7 | +2.8 | |
Turnout | 857 | 90.3 | −2.6 | ||
Registered electors | 949 | ||||
Majority | 92 | 7.6 | +4.4 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.2 | |||
Majority | 2 | 0.2 | −6.4 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −2.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 473 | 37.7 | +6.5 | |
Whig | William Charles Harland | 433 | 34.5 | −34.3 | |
Radical | Thomas Colpitts Granger | 350 | 27.9 | N/A | |
Turnout | 829 | 92.9 | −2.4 | ||
Registered electors | 892 | ||||
Majority | 40 | 3.2 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +20.4 | |||
Majority | 83 | 6.6 | +4.9 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −20.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Charles Harland | 440 | 35.9 | ||
Whig | William Chaytor | 404 | 32.9 | ||
Tory | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 383 | 31.2 | ||
Majority | 21 | 1.7 | |||
Turnout | 768 | 95.3 | |||
Registered electors | 806 | ||||
Whig win (new boundaries) | |||||
Whig win (new boundaries) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Chaytor | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Arthur Hill-Trevor | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | c. 1,200 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Chaytor | 495 | 51.1 | +13.9 | |
Tory | Arthur Hill-Trevor | 470 | 48.6 | +15.5 | |
Whig | John Clervaux Chaytor | 3 | 0.3 | −29.4 | |
Majority | 25 | 2.5 | −1.6 | ||
Turnout | 968 | c. 80.7 | |||
Registered electors | c. 1,200 | ||||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | −0.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Michael Angelo Taylor | 546 | 37.2 | ||
Tory | Roger Gresley | 486 | 33.1 | ||
Whig | William Chaytor, Senior | 436 | 29.7 | ||
Turnout | 988 | ||||
Registered electors | |||||
Majority | 60 | 4.1 | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Majority | 50 | 3.4 | |||
Tory hold |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.