Crime and Punishment U.S.A.
1959 American crime drama film From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Crime and Punishment U.S.A. is a 1959 American crime drama film directed by Denis Sanders, written by Walter Newman and starring George Hamilton in his first screen role.[1] The film was released on November 1, 1959.
Crime and Punishment U.S.A. | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Directed by | Denis Sanders |
Screenplay by | Walter Newman |
Based on | Crime and Punishment 1866 novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky |
Produced by | Terry Sanders |
Starring | Mary Murphy Frank Silvera Marian Seldes John Harding George Hamilton |
Cinematography | Floyd Crosby |
Edited by | Merrill G. White |
Music by | Herschel Burke Gilbert |
Distributed by | Allied Artists |
Release date |
|
Running time | 96 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
The New York Times called the film "a beat generation version"[2][3] of the novel Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. The film differs from the book in some of its plot elements and characterizations, and it takes place in contemporary Santa Monica rather than in 19th-century Russia.
Plot summary
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2023) |
A California law student murders a pawnbroker, then matches wits with the detective on the case. However, his conscience finally catches up with him, and he confesses to the murder.
Cast
- Mary Murphy as Sally Marmon
- Frank Silvera as Lt. Porter
- Marian Seldes as Debbie Cole
- John Harding as Fred Swanson
- Wayne Heffley as Rafe
- Toni Merrill as Mrs. Cole
- Lew Brown as Sgt. Samuels
- Barry Atwater
- Sid Clute as Doctor
- Ken Drake as Hendricks
- Magda Harout
- Jim Hyland as Man in Coffee Shop
- Len Lesser as Desk Officer
- George Saris
- George Hamilton as Robert Cole
Production
According to George Hamilton, director Denis Sanders "saw his project as a tragedy for the Beat Generation" and cast Hamilton because of his similarity to Tony Perkins.[4]
The film was completed early in 1958 but was released more than one year later.[4]
Reception
In a contemporary review for The New Republic, Stanley Kauffmann commented that "modern versions of classics are generally more clever than convincing because the very term 'classic' means a timeless work ... that need not be transplanted. ... [B]y reason of its attendant skills and an innocent, unpretentious earnestness of address, [the film] is a moderately interesting attempt to state the material of a vast symphony with a small jazz combination."[5]
Roger Corman later said that the film "lost me a lot of money."[6]
See also
References
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.