Carney v. Adams

Carney v. Adams, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, because Adams did not show that he was "able and ready" to apply for a judicial vacancy in the imminent future, he failed to show a "personal," "concrete" and "imminent" injury necessary for Article III standing.^[1][2]

Carney v. Adams
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 10, 2020
Full case name	Carney v. Adams
Docket no.	19-309
Citations	592 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
Because Adams did not show that he was "able and ready" to apply for a judicial vacancy in the imminent future, he failed to show a "personal," "concrete" and "imminent" injury necessary for Article III standing.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinion
Majority	Breyer, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Article III

References

1. Carney v. Adams, No. 19-309, 592 U.S. ___ (2020).
2. "Opinion analysis: Court throws out challenge to Delaware rules on bipartisanship in judiciary". SCOTUSblog. 2020-12-10. Retrieved 2024-10-29.

External links

• Text of Carney v. Adams, No. 19-309, 592 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)