Bharatanatyam

Bharatanatyam (Tamil: பரதநாட்டியம்) is an Indian classical dance form that originated in Tamil Nadu, India.^[1][2] It is a classical dance form recognized by the Sangeet Natak Akademi, and expresses South Indian religious themes and spiritual ideas of Hinduism and Jainism.^[3][4][5]

Bharatanatyam

Native name	பரதநாட்டியம் (Tamil)
Etymology	Portmanteau of the Tamil words bhavam (expression), ragam (melody), thalam (rhythm), and natyam (dance)
Genre	Indian classical dance
Origin	Tamil Nadu, India

A description of precursors of Bharatanatyam from the Natya Shastra dated around (500 BCE)^[6][7] and in the ancient Tamil epic Silappatikaram dated around (171 CE),^[8][9] while temple sculptures of the 6th to 9th century CE suggest dance was a refined performance art by the mid-1st millennium CE.^[10][11] Sadiraattam, which was renamed Bharatanatyam in 1932, is the oldest classical dance tradition in India.^[12] Bharatanatyam is the state dance form of Tamil Nadu.

Bharatanatyam contains different types of bani. Bani, or "tradition", is a term used to describe the dance technique and style specific to a guru or school, often named for the village of the guru. Bharatanatyam style is noted for its fixed upper torso, bent legs, and flexed knees (Aramandi) combined with footwork, and a vocabulary of sign language based on gestures of hands, eyes, and face muscles.^[11] The dance is accompanied by music and a singer, and typically the dancer's guru is present as the nattuvanar or director-conductor of the performance and art. The performance repertoire of Bharatanatyam, like other classical dances, includes nrita (pure dance), nritya (Conveys a meaning to the audience through hand gestures) and natya (Consists of the elements of drama).^[13][14] A program of bharatanatyam usually lasts two hours without interruption and includes a specific list of procedures, all performed by one dancer, who does not leave the stage or change costume. The accompanying orchestra—composed of drums, drone, and singer—occupies the back of the stage, led by the guru, or the teacher, of the dancer.

Sadiraattam remained exclusive to Hindu temples through the 19th century.^[11] It was banned by the colonial British government in 1910,^[15] but the Indian community protested against the ban and expanded its performance outside temples in the 20th century as Bharatanatyam.^[11][15][16] Modern stage productions of Bharatanatyam have become popular throughout India and include performances that are purely dance-based on non-religious ideas and fusion themes.^[10][11] The Thanjavur Quartet developed the basic structure of modern Bharatanatyam by formalizing it.^[17]

Etymology

In 1932, E Krishna Iyer and Rukmini Devi Arundale put forward a proposal to rename Sadiraattam (Tamil: சதிராட்டம்), also known as Parathaiyar Aattam or Thevarattam, as Bharatanatyam, to give the dance form a measure of respect, at a meeting of the Madras Music Academy.^[18] They also were instrumental in modifying mainly the Pandanallur style of dance. The word Bharatam is also seen as a backronym,^[11] with bha standing for bhavam (feelings, emotions), ra for ragam (melody, framework for musical notes), and tam for talam (rhythm).^[11][19][20] The term Natyam is a Sanskrit word for "dance". The compound word Bharatanatyam is seen to connote a dance that harmoniously expresses bhavam, ragam and talam.^[19]

History

Dancers at Thanjavur, Brihadeshwara temple dedicated to Shiva. The temple has been a center for dance since about 1000 CE.^[21]

Notable Sadir dancer Gnyana of Tanjore, 19th century.^[22]

The theoretical foundations of dance Bharatanatyam are found first in Natya Shastra, a Sanskrit text of performance arts and later in a Tamil text called Kootha nool taken from Tholkappiyam (250 BCE).^[10][23][24]

Natya Shastra is attributed to the ancient scholar Bharata Muni, and its first complete compilation is dated to between 500 BCE and 200 CE,^[25][26] but estimates vary between 500 BCE and 500 CE.^[27] Richmond et al. estimate the Natasutras to have been composed around 600 BCE.^[7] The most studied version of the Natya Shastra text consists of about 6000 verses structured into 36 chapters.^[25][28] The text, states Natalia Lidova, describes the theory of Tāṇḍava dance (Shiva), the theory of rasa, of bhāva, expression, gestures, acting techniques, basic steps, standing postures—all of which are part of Indian classical dances.^[25][29] Dance and performance arts, states this text,^[30] are a form of expression of spiritual ideas, virtues and the essence of scriptures.^[31]

Historical references to dance are found in the Tamil epics Silappatikaram (c. 2nd century CE^[32]) and Manimegalai (c. 6th century).^[10][11] The ancient text Silappatikaram, includes a story of a dancing girl named Madhavi; it describes the dance training regimen called Arangatrau Kathai of Madhavi in verses 113 through 159.^[32] The carvings in Kanchipuram's Shiva temple that have been dated to 6th to 9th century CE suggest dance was a well-developed performance art by about the mid 1st millennium CE.^[10][11][33]

A 7th century Shiva in Karnataka

A Bharatanatyam pose

Dance helped inspire musicians, poets, painters, singers, and sculptors in Indian history.^[34]

A famous example of illustrative sculpture is in the southern gateway of the Chidambaram temple (≈12th century) dedicated to the Hindu god Shiva, where 108 poses, described as karanas in the Natya Shastra, are carved in stone.^[35][36]

Bharatanatyam shares the dance poses of many ancient Shiva sculptures in Hindu temples. The Cave 1 of the Badami cave temples, dated to the 7th century,^[37] portrays the Tandava-dancing Shiva as Nataraja.^[38][39][40] The image, 5 feet (1.5 m) tall, has 18 arms in a form that expresses the dance positions arranged in a geometric pattern.^[40] The arms of Shiva express mudras (symbolic hand gestures),^[41] that are used in Bharatanatyam.^[10][42]

Devadasis, anti-dance movement, colonial ban, and the decline

Some colonial Indologists and modern authors have argued that Bharatanatyam is a descendant of an ancient Devadasi (lit. 'servant girls of Devas') culture, suggesting a historical origin back to between 300 BCE and 300 CE.^[43] Modern scholars have questioned this theory for lack of any direct textual or archeological evidence.^[44][45] Historic sculptures and texts do describe and project dancing girls, as well as temple quarters dedicated to women, but they do not state them to be courtesans and prostitutes as alleged by early colonial Indologists.^[43] According to Davesh Soneji, a critical examination of evidence suggests that courtesan dancing is a phenomenon of the modern era, beginning in the late 16th or the 17th century of the Nayaka period of Tamil Nadu.^[43] According to James Lochtefeld, classical dance remained exclusive to Hindu temples through the 19th century, only in the 20th century appearing on stage outside the temples.^[11] Further, the Thanjavur Maratha kingdom patronized classical dance.^[46]

Rukmini Devi Arundale, pictured in 1940, proposed Bharatanatyam after Hindu temple dancing was banned by the British colonial government in 1910.

With the arrival of the East India Company in the 18th century, and British colonial rule in the 19th, classical Indian dance forms were ridiculed and discouraged, and these performance arts declined.^[47] Christian missionaries and British officials presented "nautch girls" of north India (Kathak) and "devadasis" of south India (Bharatanatyam) as evidence of "harlots, debased erotic culture, slavery to idols and priests" tradition, and Christian missionaries demanded that this must be stopped, launching the "anti-dance movement" in 1892.^[48][49][50] The anti-dance camp accused the dance form as a front for prostitution, while revivalists questioned the constructed colonial histories.^[44][45]

In 1910, the Madras Presidency of the British Empire banned temple dancing, and with it the classical dance tradition in Hindu temples.^[15]

The banning of temple dancing stemmed from the 1892 anti-dance movement and new, liberal colonial perspectives. What the English imagined nineteenth-century modernity to be did not include what they regarded Bharatanatyam to be, which they regarded as indecent.^[51] Coming from a deep orientalist perspective, the morality of people who performed Bharatanatyam was called into question.^[52] Accusations of prostitution were thrown around. Some women from traditionally performing communities were used as a way to showcase obscenity.^[53] New reforms disregarded local issues like production of the arts for the sake of liberalism and felt able to impose disruptive reforms that reshaped lives at all levels and subjected people to new standards. Colonial reforms were largely unsympathetic to local traditions, and dismissive of the industry surrounding producing art.^[51] The adoption of Anglo-Indian laws that imposed certain restrictions and regulations on certain expressions of sexuality, and more so regulations on bodies and sex in general, which in turn affected traditional dance practices.^[53] Temple dancing became caught in a web of multiple political agendas, hoping to bend this burgeoning morality issue to suit their cause.^[54] Colonial denunciations of the practice of temple dancing were caught up in liberal ideals of bringing modernity to India, where modernity was tied to Anglo-Protestant moral ideas about how bodies are viewed and how sexuality was presented.^[53]

Post-colonial revival

The 1910 ban triggered protests against the stereotyping and dehumanization of temple dancers.^[15] Tamil people were concerned that a historic and rich dance tradition was being victimized under the excuse of social reform.^[15][55] Classical art revivalists such as E. Krishna Iyer, a lawyer who had learned from traditional practitioners of Sadir, questioned the cultural discrimination and the assumed connection, asking why prostitution needs years of training for performance arts, and how killing performance arts could end any evils in society.^[56][57] Iyer was arrested and sentenced to prison on charges of nationalism, who while serving out his prison term persuaded his fellow political prisoners to support Bharatanatyam.^[58]

While the British colonial government enforced laws to suppress Hindu temple dances, some from the West, such as the American dancer Esther Sherman moved to India in 1930, learned Indian classical dances, changed her name to Ragini Devi, and joined the movement to revive Bharatanatyam and other ancient dance arts.^[59]

The Indian independence movement in the early 20th century, already in progress, became a period of cultural foment and initiated an effort by its people to reclaim their culture and rediscover history.^[48][60][61] In this period of cultural and political turmoil, Bharatanatyam was revived as a mainstream dance outside of Hindu temples by artists such as Rukmini Devi Arundale, Balasaraswati and Yamini Krishnamurti^[62][63] They championed and performed the Pandanallur style and Thanjavur styles of Bharatanatyam.^[62]

Nationalist movements that brought revitalizing devadasis up as an issue to focus on viewed it as a way to critique the imposition of colonial morality on India. However, the revival movement was not without Western influence. Nationalist movements that also focused on devadasis revival were influenced by Western ideas of democratization of arts. Part of the revival movement was making the opportunity to dance open to more people.^[54] Nationalist movements that focused on revival were also influenced by Western ideology through their propagation that part of the revival movement is a reassertion of traditional values, as well as a moment to remind people of the country’s cultural heritage and reestablish a sense of identity.^[64] Fighting for freedom from the British and fighting for civil liberties included debates about morality, and how gender impacts morality. The revival movement moralized devadasis by democratizing the art, while also decorating it with the female performing class.^[54] Figures like Rukmini Devi Arundale, who are credited with revitalizing Bharatanatyam, also shifted the practice to appeal to middle to upper-class women.^[52] Rukmini Devi Arundale is credited with helping develop the Kalakshetra style of Bharatanatyam.^[51] There was an emphasis on building a modern India through Indian nationalism, which tied in with protecting traditional artistic traditions. The decommercialization and sanitation of Bharatanatyam for the sake of protecting the spirit of the art is part of Bharatanatyam’s revival.^[54] Bharatanatyam’s successful revival meant that it was regarded as a classical dance tradition specific to India, as opposed to a cultural dance that had been changed by colonial censorship.^[51] It was becoming a modern nation to have a traditional dance that was practiced recreationally and was nationally recognized.^[64] With the standardization of Bharatanatyam, there came books based on historic texts, like Natya Shastra, which described the different movements.^[65] Evidence of a successful revival movement of Bharatanatyam through Indian Nationalist movements was the introduction of state-sponsored dance festivals in 1955 in an independent India. These festivals were put on to display art with religious, social, and cultural connotations that have some regional diversity on a common national platform.^[64]

In the late 20th century, Tamil Hindu migrants reintroduced the traditions of temple dancing in British Tamil temples.^[66]

Elements

Rama Vaidyanathan using expression and posture

Bharatanatyam is traditionally a team performance art that consists of a solo dancer, accompanied by musicians and one or more singers. It is described as classical art because the theory of musical notes, vocal performance, and the dance movement reflect ideas of the Sanskrit treatise Natya Shastra and other Sanskrit and Tamil texts, such as the Abhinaya Darpana.^[67][68]

The solo artist (ekaharya) in Bharatanatyam is dressed in a colorful sari, adorned with jewelry and presents a dance and it is synchronized with Indian classical music.^[67] The hand and facial gestures are a coded sign language able to recite legends and spiritual ideas from the Mahabharata, the Ramayana, the Puranas and historic drama texts.^[67][69] The dancer deploys turns or specific body movements to mark punctuations in the story or the entry of a different character in the play or legend being acted out through dance. Abhinaya is the art of expression in Indian aesthetics; footwork, body language, postures, musical notes, the tones of the vocalist, aesthetics and costumes integrate to express and communicate the underlying text.^[67][70]

In modern adaptations, Bharatanatyam dance troupes may involve many dancers who play specific characters in a story, creatively choreographed to ease the interpretation and expand the experience by the audience.^[71]

The repertoire of Bharatanatyam, like all major classical Indian dance forms, follows the three categories of performance in the Natya Shastra. These are Nritta (Nirutham), Nritya (Niruthiyam) and Natya (Natyam).^[69]

The purpose
Bharata Natyam is an art which consecrates the body (...)
the dancer, who dissolves her identity in rhythm and music, makes her body an instrument, at least for the duration of the dance, for the experience and expression of the spirit.
The traditional order of Bharata Natyam recital viz. alarippu, jatiswaram, varnam, padams, tillana and the shloka is the correct sequence in the practice of this art, which is an artistic Yoga, for revealing the spiritual through the corporeal.

Balasaraswati, a devadasi^[72][73]

• The Nritta performance is an abstract, fast, and rhythmic aspect of the dance.^[74] The viewer is presented with pure movement in Bharatanatyam, wherein the emphasis is the beauty in motion, form, speed, range, and pattern.^[69] This part of the repertoire has no interpretative aspect, no telling of the story. It is a technical performance and aims to engage the senses (Prakriti) of the audience.^[75]
• The Nritya is a slower and more expressive aspect of the dance that attempts to communicate feelings, and storyline, particularly with spiritual themes in Hindu dance traditions.^[74] In a nritya, the dance-acting expands to include silent expression of words through gestures and body motion set to musical notes. The actor articulates a legend or a spiritual message. This part of a Bharatanatyam repertoire is more than sensory enjoyment, it aims to engage the emotions and mind of the viewer.^[69][75]
• The Natyam is a play, typically a team performance,^[14] but can be acted out by a solo performer where the dancer uses certain standardized body movements to indicate a new character in the underlying story. A Natya incorporates the elements of a Nritya.^[69]

Arangetram

Bharatanatyan Student with Guru in Arangetram Ceremony^[76]

A Bharatanatyam arangetram is a solo debut performance that signifies the completion of initial formal training of a young dancer, female or male in Indian classical dance. The term Arangetram translates to "ascending the stage". This performance is typically done ten to twelve years after a dancer begins learning Bharatanatyam. Still, more importantly, it is done when the guru believes the student is ready for a solo performance. This solo debut is synonymous with a "coming-of-age" celebration. The arangetram is a culmination of multiple years of hard work by the student and the guru, and it is an opportunity for the dancer to showcase his or her dedication and skills developed over the years. Throughout this debut, the dancer performs a series of dances. The dancer must build up his or her concentration and stamina to perform solo dances for approximately three hours. Each dance performed symbolizes various aspects of Hindu religion.^[77][78]

Sequence of dances

A girl performing a Bharatanatyam dance at a Pongal Festival in Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India

A traditional Bharatanatyam arangetram dance performance follows a seven to eight-part order of presentation. This set is called Margam.^[72][79]

Pushpanjali

The Arangetram performance typically begins with a dance called the Pushpanjali, which translates to "offering of flowers". In this dance, the performer offers flowers and salutations to the Hindu deities, the guru, and the audience as a mark of respect. The beginning of the dance symbolizes supplication, from which the dancer then commences the rest of the performance.^[80]

Alarippu

The presentation can also begin with a rhythmic invocation (vandana) called the Alarippu.^[20] It is a pure dance, which combines a thank you and benediction for blessings from the gods and goddesses, the guru and the gathered performance team. It also serves as a preliminary warm-up dance, without melody, to enable the dancer to loosen their body, and journey away from distractions and towards single-minded focus.^[72]

Jatiswaram

The next stage of the performance adds melody to the movement of Alarippu, and this is called Jatiswaram.^[20][72] The dance remains a prelim technical performance (nritta), pure in form and without any expressed words. The drums set the beat, of any Carnatic music raga (melody). They perform a sequence (Korvai) to the rhythm of the beat, presenting to the audience the unity of music, rhythm and movements.^[72]

Shabdam

The performance sequence then adds Shabdam (expressed words).^[81] This is the first item of Margam where expressions are introduced. The solo dancer, the vocalist(s), and the musical team, in this stage of the production, present short compositions, with words and meaning, in a spectrum of moods.^[82] This performance praises God (such as Krishna, Shiva, Rama, and Murugan) and their qualities.^[83][84]

Varnam

The Varnam part of Bharatanatyam emphasizes expressive dance.

The performance thereafter evolves into the Varnam stage.^[81] This marks the arrival into the sanctum sanctorum core of the performance.^[72] It is the longest section and the nritya. A traditional Varnam may be as long as 30–45 minutes or sometimes an hour. Varnam offers huge scope for improvisation and an experienced dancer can stretch the Varnam to a desirable length. The artist presents the play or the main composition, reveling in all their movements, silently communicating the text through codified gestures and footwork, harmoniously with the music, rhythmically punctuated. The dancer performs complicated moves, such as expressing a verse at two speeds.^[85] Their hands and body tell a story, whether of love and longing or of a battle between the good and the evil,^[86] as the musicians envelop them with musical notes and tones that set the appropriate mood.^[82]

Padam

The Padam is next.^[81][87] This is the stage of reverence, of simplicity, of abhinaya (expression) of the solemn spiritual message or devotional religious prayer (bhakti). The music is lighter, the chant intimate, the dance emotional.^[85][88] The choreography attempts to express rasa (emotional taste) and a mood, while the recital may include items such as a keertanam (expressing devotion), a javali (expressing divine love) or something else.^[85][87]

Tillana

The performance sequence ends with a Tillana, the climax.^[81] It closes out the nritya portion, the movements exit the temple of expressive dance, returning to the nritta style, where a series of pure movement and music are rhythmically performed. Therewith the performance ends.^{[72][85][note 1]}

Shlokam or Mangalam

The seventh and final item in the sequence can be either a Shlokam or a Mangalam. The dancer calls for blessings on the people all around.^[91]

The overall sequence of Bharatanatyam, states Balasaraswati, thus moves from "mere meter; then melody and meter; continuing with music, meaning and meter; its expansion in the centerpiece of the varnam; thereafter, music and meaning without meter; (...) a non-metrical song at the end. We see a most wonderful completeness and symmetry in this art".^[92]

Costumes in Bharatanatyam

Costume and attire

The costume of a female Bharatanatyam dancer resembles a Tamil Hindu bridal dress. It typically consists of a sari in bright colors with golden or silver zari embroidery on the borders. The costume can be stitched from the sari, with individual pieces for a bottom (either a skirt or salwar-shaped pants), a pleated piece which falls in front and opens like a hand fan when the dancer flexes her knees or performs footwork, a hip piece that covers the seat of the pant/skirt, and a torso piece that looks like an aanchal (i.e. the draped part of a regular sari). Some dancers also opt for an unstitched sari that is draped specially, with the single piece of cloth starting around the legs like a dhoti, then upwards along the front torso, over the left shoulder, and then down the back with its end held at the waist by a jeweled belt.^[93] The costume of a male Bharatanatyam dancer is usually either a sari or a white cotton cloth draped around the legs and bottom half of the body like a dhoti. During performances, the upper body of the male dancer remains bare. Male dancers typically do not wear stitched costumes.

Both female and male dancers wear elaborate jewelry on their ears, nose, neck, and wrists. Female dancers wear additional jewelry on their heads that emphasizes their hairline and parting. They also wear a smaller piece of jewelry on each side of their parting. These represent the sun and the moon.

Long hair on both male and female dancers is either secured by a bun or a braid. Female dancers with short hair often use braid extensions or bun hair pieces to simulate long hair. Female dancers also wear imitation flowers made of either cloth or paper around their braids or buns. These are known as (or gajra).

Both male and female dancers wear makeup, including foundation, blush, lipstick, and thick eyeliner or kohl, which helps the audience see and understand their facial expressions.^[94]

All dancers wear leather anklets on each foot, which are called salangai or ghungroos.^[95][96] These are made of small bells attached to a broad leather strap with belts that secure them at the back of the ankle. The bells are arranged in uniform rows and can be heard when the dancer moves their feet. The salangai helps emphasize the rhythm of the music as well as the dancer's footwork.

Lastly, all dancers outline their hands and feet with red kumkum powder or alta, a tradition that helps the audience easily see their hand and foot gestures.^[97]

For classes, training, practice, or rehearsals, dancers traditionally wear a special dance sari. These saris are always cotton and have a shorter breadth than normal saris, falling at the knees rather than the ankles. These are paired with cotton pyjamas and blouses. The sari is worn with pleats at the front and tied tightly around the torso and hips. However, in recent times, dancers also opt for salwar kameez or athletic wear (like T-shirts and leggings) when not performing. ^{[citation needed]}

The accompanying music to Bharatanatyam is in the Carnatic style of South India, as is the recitation and chanting.^[98] The vocalist is called nattuvanar, typically also the conductor of the entire performance, who may be the guru of the dancer and may also be playing cymbals or one of the musical instruments.^[89][99] The recited verses and text in Bharatanatyam are in Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Sanskrit.^[100]

The instruments used include the mridangam (double-sided drum), nadaswaram (long type of oboe made from black wood), nattuvangam (cymbals), the flute, violin and veena.^[89][94]

Symbolism

Bharatanatyam, like all classical dances of India, uses symbolism in its abhinaya (acting) and its goals. The roots of abhinaya appear in the Natya Shastra text, which defines drama in verse 6.10 as something that aesthetically arouses joy in the spectator, through the medium of the actor's art of communication, that helps connect and transport the individual into a sensual inner state of being. ^[101] A performance art, asserts Natya Shastra, connects the artists and the audience through abhinaya (literally, "carrying to the spectators"), that is applying body-speech-mind and scene, wherein the actors communicate to the audience, through song and music. ^[101] Drama in this ancient Sanskrit text, thus is an art that engages every aspect of life to glorify and give a state of joyful consciousness. ^[102]

Example mudras – gestures as symbols in Bharatanatyam.

The communication through symbols is in the form of expressive gestures and pantomime set to music. The gestures and facial expressions convey the ras (sentiment, emotional taste) and bhava (mood) of the underlying story.^[103] In the Hindu texts on dance, the dancer successfully expresses the spiritual ideas by paying attention to four aspects of a performance: Angika (gestures and body language), Vachika (song, recitation, music and rhythm), Aharya (stage setting, costume, makeup, jewelry), and Sattvika (artist's mental disposition and emotional connection with the story and audience, wherein the artist's inner and outer state resonates).^[103] Abhinaya draws out the bhava (mood, psychological states).^[103]

The gestures used in Bharatanatyam are called Hasta (or mudras). These symbols are of three types: asamyuta hastas (single hand gestures), samyuta hastas (two hand gestures), and nrtta hastas (dance hand gestures).^[104] Like words in a glossary, these gestures are presented in the nritta as a list or embellishment to a prelim performance. In nritya stage of Bharatanatyam, these symbols set in a certain sequence become sentences with meaning, with emotions expressed through facial expressions and other aspects of abhinaya.^[104] The basic standing position is called as Aramandi.

Bharatanatyam contains at least 20 asanas found in modern yoga, including Dhanurasana (the bow, a back-arch); Chakrasana (the wheel, a standing back-arch); Vrikshasana (the tree, a standing pose); and Natarajasana, the pose of dancing Shiva.^[105] 108 karanas of classical temple dance are represented in temple statuary; they depict the devadasi temple dancers who made use of yoga asanas in their dancing.^[106] Bharatanatyam is also considered a form of Bhakti Yoga.^[106] However, Natarajasana is not found in any medieval hatha yoga text; it was among the many asanas introduced into modern yoga by Krishnamacharya in the early 20th century.^[107]

Modern revival: schools and training centers

An expression through gesture in Bharatanatyam.

Bharatanatyam rapidly expanded after India gained independence from British rule in 1947. It is now the most popular classical Indian dance style in India, enjoys a high degree of support in expatriate Indian communities, and is considered to be synonymous with Indian dance by many foreigners unaware of the diversity of dances and performance arts in Indian culture.^[108] In the second half of the 20th century, Bharatanatyam has been to Indian dance tradition what ballet has been in the West.^[108]

When the British government tried to attempt to ban Bharatanatyam traditions, it went on and revived by moving outside the Hindu temple and religious ideas. However, post-independence, with rising interest in its history, the ancient traditions, the invocation rituals and the spiritually expressive part of the dance has returned.^[108] Many innovations and developments in modern Bharatanatyam, states Anne-Marie Geston, are of a quasi-religious type.^[108] Major cities in India now have numerous schools that offer lessons in Bharatanatyam, and these cities host hundreds of shows every year.^[109][110]

Outside India, Bharatanatyam is a sought-after and studied dance, states Meduri, in academic institutes in the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia, the Gulf States, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, New Zealand, Bangladesh and Singapore.^[111] For expat Indian and Tamil communities in many countries, it is a source and means for social life and community bonding.^[112] Contemporary Bharatanatyam choreographies include both male and female dancers.^[35]

In 2020, an estimated 10,000 dancers got together in Chennai, India, to break the world record for the largest Bharatanatyam performance.^[113] The previous record of 7,190 dancers was set in Chidambaram in 2019.^[114]

In cinema

One movement in the Bharatanatyam by Rama Vaidyanathan at the Guimet Museum (2009).

1. Senthamarai (Tamil, 1962)
2. Thillana Mohanambal (Tamil, 1968)
3. Paattum Bharathamum (Tamil, 1975)
4. Sagara Sangamam (Telugu, 1983)
5. Mayuri (Telugu, 1985)
6. Manichitrathazhu (Malayalam, 1993)
7. Sringaram (Tamil, 2007)
8. Kamaladalam (Malayalam, 1992)
9. Kochu Kochu Santhoshangal (Malayalam)

See also

• Culture of India
• Vazhuvoor (dance)

Notes

1. After the Tillana, the dancer may continue to the seventh part, called Shloka.^[89] It is a reverential greeting, a thank you or a prayer to one or more gods, goddesses or to one's teacher. This is a post-performance, where a Sanskrit verse (Shloka) is danced out in the form of nritya. An example Shloka:^[90] "The Guru (teacher) is the Brahma, the Guru is the Vishnu, the Guru is the Maheshvara (Shiva). The Guru is the pathway to Supreme Brahman (supreme soul), to you the auspicious, I reverentially bow." Original: गुरुर्ब्रह्मा गुरुर्विष्णुर्गुरुर्देवो महेश्वरः । गुरुरेव परं ब्रह्म तस्मै श्रीगुरवे नमः ।।

References

1. Franco, Susanne; Nordera, Marina (29 April 2016). Dance Discourses: Keywords in Dance Research. Routledge. p. 202. ISBN 978-1-134-94712-6.
2. Planet, Lonely; Benanav, Michael; Bindloss, Joe; Brown, Lindsay; Butler, Stuart; Elliott, Mark; Harding, Paul; Holden, Trent; Mahapatra, Anirban (1 October 2019). Lonely Planet India. Lonely Planet. ISBN 978-1-78868-682-2.
3. Bharata-natyam Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007
4. Richard Schechner (2010). Between Theater and Anthropology. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 65–66. ISBN 978-0-8122-0092-8.
5. T Balasaraswati (1976), Bharata Natyam, NCPA Quarterly Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, pages 1-8
6. Natalia Lidova 1994, pp. 111–113.
7. Richmond, Swann & Zarrilli 1993, p. 30.
8. Dikshitar 1939, pp. 11–18.
9. Danielou 1965, p. ix.
10. Khokar, Mohan (1984). Traditions of Indian Classical Dance. India: Clarion Books. pp. 73–76.
11. James G. Lochtefeld (2002). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-M. The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 103–104. ISBN 978-0-8239-3179-8.
12. Richard Schechner (2010). Between Theater and Anthropology. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-0812279290.
13. Peter J. Claus; Sarah Diamond; Margaret Ann Mills (2003). South Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-415-93919-5.
14. Kavitha Jayakrishnan (2011), Dancing Architecture: the parallel evolution of Bharatanātyam and South Indian Architecture, MA Thesis, Awarded by University of Waterloo, Canada, page 25
15. Pallabi Chakravorty; Nilanjana Gupta (2012). Dance Matters: Performing India on Local and Global Stages. Routledge. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-136-51612-2.
16. Janet O'Shea (2007). At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam on the Global Stage. Wesleyan University Press. pp. 26–38, 55–57, 83–87. ISBN 978-0-8195-6837-3.
17. Mahotsav, Amrit. "'Tanjore Quartet' and the birth of modern-day Bharatanatyam". Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav, Ministry of Culture, Government of India. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
18. Amanda J. Weidman (2006). Singing the Classical, Voicing the Modern. Duke University Press. p. 120. ISBN 9780822388050.
19. Anjani Arunkumar (1989), Compositions for Bharatanāṭyam: A Soulful Worship the Divine, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, pp. xxi–xxii
20. Brenda P McCutchen (2006). Teaching Dance as Art in. Human Kinetics. pp. 450–452. ISBN 978-0-7360-5188-0.
21. James G. Lochtefeld (2002). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-M. The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 126–127. ISBN 978-0-8239-3179-8.
22. Roebert, Donovan. "The Celebrated Sadir Dancer Tanjore Gnyana (1857-1922): A Life in Words and Pictures".
23. Eugenio Barba; Nicola Savarese (2011). A Dictionary of Theatre Anthropology: The Secret Art of the Performer. Routledge. p. 208. ISBN 978-1-135-17634-1.
24. Peter Fletcher; Laurence Picken (2004). World Musics in Context: A Comprehensive Survey of the World's Major Musical Cultures. Oxford University Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-19-517507-3.
25. Natalia Lidova 2014.
26. Tarla Mehta 1995, pp. xxiv, 19–20.
27. Wallace Dace 1963, p. 249.
28. Emmie Te Nijenhuis 1974, pp. 1–25.
29. Kapila Vatsyayan 2001.
30. Guy L. Beck (2012). Sonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 138–139. ISBN 978-1-61117-108-2. Quote: "A summation of the signal importance of the Natyasastra for Hindu religion and culture has been provided by Susan Schwartz, "In short, the Natyasastra is an exhaustive encyclopedic dissertation of the arts, with an emphasis on performing arts as its central feature. It is also full of invocations to deities, acknowledging the divine origins of the arts and the central role of performance arts in achieving divine goals (...)".
31. Coormaraswamy and Duggirala (1917). "The Mirror of Gesture". Harvard University Press. p. 4.; Also see chapter 36
32. Ragini Devi 1990, p. 47.
33. Kilger, George (1993). Bharata Natyam in Cultural Perspective. New Delhi: Manohar American Institute of Indian Studies. p. 2.
34. Allen G. Noble; Ashok K. Dutt (1982). India: Cultural Patterns and Processes. Westview Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-86531-237-1.
35. Constance Jones; James D. Ryan (2006). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Infobase Publishing. pp. 79, 107. ISBN 978-0-8160-7564-5.
36. Vidya Dehejia (2013). Art of the Imperial Cholas. Columbia University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-0-231-51524-5.
37. JC Harle (1972), Aspects of Indian Art, BRILL Academic, ISBN 978-90-04-03625-3, page 68
38. Michell 2014, p. 37–38.
39. Fergusson 1880, p. 414.
40. Alice Boner (1990), Principles of Composition in Hindu Sculpture: Cave Temple Period, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0705-1, pages 89–95, 115–124, 174–184
41. Fred Kleiner (2009), Gardner's Art through the Ages: Non-Western Perspectives, Wadsworth Publishing, ISBN 978-0-495-57367-8, page 21
42. Kavitha Jayakrishnan (2011), Dancing Architecture: the parallel evolution of Bharatanātyam and South Indian Architecture, MA Thesis, Awarded by University of Waterloo, Canada, pages 21-27, 46
43. Davesh Soneji (2011). Unfinished Gestures: Devadasis, Memory, and Modernity in South India. University of Chicago Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-0-226-76811-3.
44. Amrit Srinivasan (1983). "The Hindu Temple-dancer: Prostitute or Nun?". The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 8 (1): 73–99. JSTOR 23816342.
45. Leslie C. Orr (2000). Donors, Devotees, and Daughters of God: Temple Women in Medieval Tamilnadu. Oxford University Press. pp. 5, 8–17. ISBN 978-0-19-535672-4.
46. "Royal tribute to Thanjavur rulers". The New Indian Express. 2017.
47. Leslie C. Orr (2000). Donors, Devotees, and Daughters of God: Temple Women in Medieval Tamilnadu. Oxford University Press. pp. 11–13. ISBN 978-0-19-535672-4.
48. Mary Ellen Snodgrass (2016). The Encyclopedia of World Folk Dance. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 165–168. ISBN 978-1-4422-5749-8.
49. Nalini Ghuman (2014). Resonances of the Raj: India in the English Musical Imagination, 1897-1947. Oxford University Press. pp. 97 footnote 72. ISBN 978-0-19-931489-8.
50. Margaret E. Walker (2016). India's Kathak Dance in Historical Perspective. Routledge. pp. 94–98. ISBN 978-1-317-11737-7.
51. Avanthi Meduri (2004). "Bharatanatyam as a Global Dance: Some Issues in Research, Teaching, and Practice". Dance Research Journal. 36 (2): 11–29. doi:10.2307/20444589. JSTOR 20444589. S2CID 144784756.
52. Thobani, Sitara (2017). Indian classical dance and the making of Postcolonial National Identities: Dancing on Empire's stage. Routledge.
53. Kannan, Rajalakshmi Nadadur (2019). "Colonial Material Collections and Representations of Devadasi Bodies in the Public Sphere in the Early 20th-Century South India". Anthropos. 114 (2): 531–546. doi:10.5771/0257-9774-2019-2-531. ISSN 0257-9774. JSTOR 27095513. S2CID 214131186.
54. Ganesh, Swarnamalya (2015). "RENAMING "SADIR" AS BHARATANATYAM: What's in a Name?". India International Centre Quarterly. 42 (2): 116–125. ISSN 0376-9771. JSTOR 26316557.
55. Kapila Vatsyayan 1974, p. 23.
56. Amrit Srinivasan (1983). "The Hindu Temple-dancer: Prostitute or Nun?". The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 8 (1): 79–80. JSTOR 23816342.
57. Meduri, Avanthi (1988). "Bharatha Natyam-What Are You?". Asian Theatre Journal. 5 (1). University of Hawaii Press: 5–7. doi:10.2307/1124019. JSTOR 1124019.
58. Janet O'Shea (2007). At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam on the Global Stage. Wesleyan University Press. pp. 35–36. ISBN 978-0-8195-6837-3.
59. Janet O'Shea (2007). At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam on the Global Stage. Wesleyan University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-8195-6837-3.
60. Margaret E. Walker (2016). India's Kathak Dance in Historical Perspective. Routledge. pp. 99–102. ISBN 978-1-317-11737-7.
61. Ester Gallo (2016). Migration and Religion in Europe: Comparative Perspectives on South Asian Experiences. Routledge. p. 32. ISBN 978-1-317-09637-5.
62. Paromitra Kar (2013). Adam M. Pine and Olaf Kuhlke (ed.). Geographies of Dance: Body, Movement, and Corporeal Negotiations. Lexington. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-0-7391-7185-1.
63. Janet O'Shea (2007). At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam on the Global Stage. Wesleyan University Press. pp. 82–85. ISBN 978-0-8195-6837-3.
64. Shah, Purnima (2002). "State Patronage in India: Appropriation of the "Regional" and "National"". Dance Chronicle. 25 (1): 125–141. doi:10.1081/DNC-120003123. ISSN 0147-2526. JSTOR 1568182. S2CID 159713358.
65. Bharat Muni. Natya Shastra.
66. Ann David (2007), Religious Dogma or Political Agenda? Bharatanatyam and its Reemergence in British Tamil Temples, Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement, Volume 14, Number 4, Fall 2007, University of Illinois Press, Archive
67. Janet O'Shea (2007). At Home in the World: Bharata Natyam on the Global Stage. Wesleyan University Press. pp. 1–3, 26, 85–86. ISBN 978-0-8195-6837-3.
68. Meduri, Avanthi (1988). "Bharatha Natyam-What Are You?". Asian Theatre Journal. 5 (1). University of Hawaii Press: 2–3. doi:10.2307/1124019. JSTOR 1124019.
69. Meduri, Avanthi (1988). "Bharatha Natyam-What Are You?". Asian Theatre Journal. 5 (1). University of Hawaii Press: 3–4. doi:10.2307/1124019. JSTOR 1124019.
70. Meduri, Avanthi (1988). "Bharatha Natyam-What Are You?". Asian Theatre Journal. 5 (1). University of Hawaii Press: 1–22. doi:10.2307/1124019. JSTOR 1124019.
71. Katrak, Ketu H. (2004). "Cultural Translation of Bharata Natyam into Contemporary Indian Dance. Second-generation South Asian Americans and cultural politics in diasporic locations". South Asian Popular Culture. 2 (2): 79–102. doi:10.1080/1474668042000275699. S2CID 144136967.
72. T Balasaraswati (1976), Bharata Natyam, NCPA Quarterly Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, page 3
73. Meduri, Avanthi (1988). "Bharatha Natyam-What Are You?". Asian Theatre Journal. 5 (1). University of Hawaii Press: 7–8. doi:10.2307/1124019. JSTOR 1124019.
74. Ellen Koskoff (2008). The Concise Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: The Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia. Routledge. p. 955. ISBN 978-0-415-99404-0.
75. Janet Descutner (2010). Asian Dance. Infobase. pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-1-4381-3078-1.
76. "Shivam Natyalaya - Bharatnatyam School". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 27 February 2024.
77. Chatterjee, Jagyaseni (8 December 2016). "Much ado about a debut". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
78. "Arangetram". 13 May 2009. Archived from the original on 13 May 2009. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
79. Ann Cooper Albright; David Gere (2003). Taken by Surprise: A Dance Improvisation Reader. Wesleyan University Press. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-8195-6648-5.
80. "Pushpanjali – Nadanam". Retrieved 26 September 2021.
81. Kapila Vatsyayan (1997). The Square and the Circle of the Indian Arts. Abhinav Publications. p. 81. ISBN 978-81-7017-362-5.
82. T Balasaraswati (1976), Bharata Natyam, NCPA Quarterly Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, pages 3-5
83. Sinha, Aakriti (2006). Let's Know Dances of India. Star Publications. p. 10. ISBN 978-81-7650-097-5.
84. Parida, Srikanta; Roshni, CP (April 2022). "An analysis of Bharatanatyam" (PDF). Journal of Veda Samskrita Academy. I: 107.
85. Bharatnatyam Dance, Centre for Cultural Resources and Training, Government of India
86. Bajaj, Tanvi; Vohra, Swasti Shrimali (2015). Performing Arts and Therapeutic Implications. Routledge. p. 127. ISBN 978-1-317-32572-7.
87. Ann Cooper Albright; David Gere (2003). Taken by Surprise: A Dance Improvisation Reader. Wesleyan University Press. pp. 141–147. ISBN 978-0-8195-6648-5.
88. T Balasaraswati (1976), Bharata Natyam, NCPA Quarterly Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, pages 3, 5-6
89. Aakriti Sinha (2010). Let's Know Dances of India. lakshmidanceacademy. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-81-7650-097-5.
90. Swami Paramatmananda Puri; Amritanandamayi Devi (2015). Dust Of Her Feet. Sterling. p. 82. ISBN 978-1-68037-296-0.
91. A Short Introduction to Bharatanatyam. Darbar Festival 2018 | An Evening of Bharatanatyam. Sadler's Wells. 24 November 2018.
92. T Balasaraswati (1976), Bharata Natyam, NCPA Quarterly Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, page 4
93. Anjani Arunkumar (1989). Compositions for Bharatanāṭyam: A Soulful Worship of the Divine. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. pp. xxi–xxii.
94. P. K. Ravindranath (1980). Bhavaṁ, ragaṁ, talam, natyaṁ: a hand-book of Indian dance. Savita Damodaran Arengetra Samiti. p. 75.
95. Gurcharan Singh Randhawa; Amitabha Mukhopadhyay (1986). Floriculture in India. Allied Publishers. pp. 607–608. ISBN 978-81-7023-494-4.
96. Swarajya Prakash Gupta; Krishna Lal; Mahua Bhattacharyya (2002). Cultural tourism in India: museums, monuments & arts. Indraprastha Museum of Art and Archaeology. p. 198. ISBN 978-81-246-0215-7.
97. Maratt Mythili Anoop; Varun Gulati (2016). Scripting Dance in Contemporary India. Lexington Books. p. 96. ISBN 978-1-4985-0552-9.
98. Siyuan Liu (2016). Routledge Handbook of Asian Theatre. Routledge. p. 132. ISBN 978-1-317-27886-3.
99. TM Krishna (2013). A Southern Music. HarperCollins Publishers. pp. 147–148. ISBN 978-93-5029-822-0.
100. Rosenblatt Louis; Sanford B. Steever (2015). The Dravidian Languages. Routledge. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-136-91164-4.
101. Tarla Mehta 1995, p. 3.
102. Tarla Mehta 1995, p. 5.
103. Tanvi Bajaj; Swasti Shrimali Vohra (2015). Performing Arts and Therapeutic Implications. Routledge. pp. 82–84. ISBN 978-1-317-32572-7.
104. Tanvi Bajaj; Swasti Shrimali Vohra (2015). Performing Arts and Therapeutic Implications. Routledge. pp. 85–87. ISBN 978-1-317-32572-7.
105. Bhavanani, Ananda Balayogi; Bhavanani, Devasena (2001). "BHARATANATYAM AND YOGA". Archived from the original on 23 October 2006. He also points out that these [Bharatanatyam dance] stances are very similar to Yoga Asanas, and in the Gopuram walls at Chidambaram, at least twenty different classical Yoga Asanas are depicted by the dancers, including Dhanurasana, Chakrasana, Vrikshasana, Natarajasana, Trivikramasana, Ananda Tandavasana, Padmasana, Siddhasana, Kaka Asana, Vrishchikasana and others.
106. Rea, Shiva (28 August 2007). "The Divine Dance". Yoga Journal.
107. Goldberg, Elliott (2016). The Path of Modern Yoga: the history of an embodied spiritual practice. Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions. pp. 223, 395–398. ISBN 978-1-62055-567-5. OCLC 926062252.
108. Anne-Marie Gaston (1992). Julia Leslie (ed.). Roles and Rituals for Hindu Women. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 149–150, 170–171. ISBN 978-81-208-1036-5.
109. Anne-Marie Gaston (1992). Julia Leslie (ed.). Roles and Rituals for Hindu Women. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 150–152. ISBN 978-81-208-1036-5.
110. Ester Gallo (2016). Migration and Religion in Europe: Comparative Perspectives on South Asian Experiences. Routledge. pp. 32–33. ISBN 978-1-317-09637-5.
111. Meduri, Avanthi (2004). "Bharatanatyam as a Global Dance: Some Issues in Research, Teaching, and Practice" (PDF). Dance Research Journal. 36 (2): 11–29. doi:10.2307/20444589. JSTOR 20444589. S2CID 144784756.
112. O'Shea, Janet (2003). "At Home in the World? The Bharatanatyam Dancer As Transnational Interpreter" (PDF). TDR. 47 (1). MIT Press: 176–186. doi:10.1162/105420403321250071. S2CID 17824898.
113. "Thousands of dancers mesmerize in world record attempt for largest Bharatanatyam performance" (Video). MSN. 12 February 2020.
114. "Over 7,000 Bharatanatyam dancers set a world record". Daily News (Source: The Hindu). 4 March 2019.

Bibliography

• Uttara Asha Coorlawala, ed. Re-presenting Indian Dance. Dance Research Journal. Congress on Research in Dance 36/2. Winter 2004. ISSN 0149-7677
• Wallace Dace (1963). "The Concept of "Rasa" in Sanskrit Dramatic Theory". Educational Theatre Journal. 15 (3): 249–254. doi:10.2307/3204783. JSTOR 3204783.
• Danielou, Alain (1965). Shilappadikaram (The Ankle Bracelet) by Iḷaṅkōvaṭikaḷ. New Directions Publishing, New York. ISBN 978-0-8112-0001-1.
• Ragini Devi (1990). Dance Dialects of India. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0674-0.
• Dikshitar, V R Ramachandra (1939), The Silappadikaram, Oxford University Press
• Fergusson, James (1880). The Caves Temples of India. W. H. Allen. Retrieved 2 April 2016.
• Douglas M. Knight, Jr. Balasaraswati: Her Art and Life. Wesleyan University Press. Middletown, CT, 2010. ISBN 978-0-8195-6906-6
• Sunil Kothari, Bharata Natyam, Marg Publications, Mumbai: 1997.
• Natalia Lidova (2014). Natyashastra. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071.
• Natalia Lidova (1994). Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-1234-5.
• Tarla Mehta (1995). Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient India. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-1057-0.
• Michell, George l (15 October 2014). Temple Architecture and Art of the Early Chalukyas: Badami, Mahakuta, Aihole, Pattadakal. Niyogi Books. ISBN 978-93-83098-33-0.
• Narayanan Chittoor Namboodiripad, "Revealing the Art of Natyasastra." ISBN 9788121512183
• Srividya Natarajan Another Stage in the Life of the Nation: Sadir, Bharatanatyam, Feminist Theory. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Dept of English, University of Hyderabad, 1997.
• Emmie Te Nijenhuis (1974). Indian Music: History and Structure. BRILL Academic. ISBN 90-04-03978-3.
• Sukanya Rahman. Dancing in the Family. Rupa and Co. New Delhi: 2004. ISBN 81-291-0594-2
• Vijaya Rao, (1987), Abbild des Göttlichen. Bharata Natyam. Der klassische Indische Tanz. Freiburg (Germany)
• Richmond, Farley P.; Swann, Darius L.; Zarrilli, Phillip B. (1993). Indian Theatre: Traditions of Performance. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0981-9.
• Kapila Vatsyayan (2001). Bharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra. Sahitya Akademi. ISBN 978-81-260-1220-6.
• Kapila Vatsyayan (1977). Classical Indian dance in literature and the arts. Sangeet Natak Akademi. OCLC 233639306., Table of Contents
• Kapila Vatsyayan (1974), Indian classical dance, Sangeet Natak Akademi, OCLC 2238067
• Kapila Vatsyayan (2008). Aesthetic theories and forms in Indian tradition. Munshiram Manoharlal. ISBN 978-8187586357. OCLC 286469807.
• Kapila Vatsyayan. Dance In Indian Painting. Abhinav Publications. ISBN 978-81-7017-153-9.
• Williams, Drid (2004). "In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing" (PDF). Visual Anthropology. 17 (1). Routledge: 69–98. doi:10.1080/08949460490274013. S2CID 29065670. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2016.

External links