Automobile drag coefficient

Resistance of a car to moving through air From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Automobile drag coefficient

The drag coefficient is a common measure in automotive design as it pertains to aerodynamics. Drag is a force that acts parallel to and in the same direction as the airflow. The drag coefficient of an automobile measures the way the automobile passes through the surrounding air. When automobile companies design a new vehicle they take into consideration the automobile drag coefficient in addition to the other performance characteristics. Aerodynamic drag increases with the square of speed; therefore it becomes critically important at higher speeds. Reducing the drag coefficient in an automobile improves the performance of the vehicle as it pertains to speed and fuel efficiency.[1] There are many different ways to reduce the drag of a vehicle. A common way to measure the drag of the vehicle is through the drag area.

Thumb
Edmund Rumpler's 1921 Tropfenwagen was the first series-produced aerodynamically designed automobile, before the Chrysler Airflow and the Tatra 77.

The importance of drag reduction

The reduction of drag in road vehicles has led to increases in the top speed of the vehicle and the vehicle's fuel efficiency, as well as many other performance characteristics, such as handling and acceleration.[2] The two main factors that impact drag are the frontal area of the vehicle and the drag coefficient. The drag coefficient is a unit-less value that denotes how much an object resists movement through a fluid such as water or air. A potential complication of altering a vehicle's aerodynamics is that it may cause the vehicle to get too much lift. Lift is an aerodynamic force that acts perpendicular to the airflow around the body of the vehicle. Too much lift can cause the vehicle to lose road traction which can be very unsafe.[3] Lowering the drag coefficient comes from streamlining the exterior body of the vehicle. Streamlining the body requires assumptions about the surrounding airspeed and characteristic use of the vehicle.

Cars that try to reduce drag employ devices such as spoilers, wings, diffusers, and fins to reduce drag and increase speed in one direction.[4]

Drag area

Summarize
Perspective

While designers pay attention to the overall shape of the automobile, they also bear in mind that reducing the frontal area of the shape helps reduce the drag. The product of drag coefficient and area – drag area – is represented as CdA (or CxA), a multiplication of Cd value by area.

The term drag area derives from aerodynamics, where it is the product of some reference area (such as cross-sectional area, total surface area, or similar) and the drag coefficient. In 2003, Car and Driver magazine adopted this metric as a more intuitive way to compare the aerodynamic efficiency of various automobiles.

The force F required to overcome drag is calculated with the drag equation: Therefore: Where the drag coefficient and reference area have been collapsed into the drag area term. This allows direct estimation of the drag force at a given speed for any vehicle for which only the drag area is known and therefore easier comparison. As drag area CdA is the fundamental value that determines power required for a given cruise speed it is a critical parameter for fuel consumption at a steady speed. This relation also allows an estimation of the new top speed of a car with a tuned engine:

Or the power required for a target top speed:

Average full-size passenger cars have a drag area of roughly 8 sq ft (0.74 m2). Reported drag areas range from the 1999 Honda Insight at 5.1 sq ft (0.47 m2) to the 2003 Hummer H2 at 26.5 sq ft (2.46 m2). The drag area of a bicycle (and rider) is also in the range of 6.5–7.5 sq ft (0.60–0.70 m2).[5]

Example drag coefficients

Summarize
Perspective

The average modern automobile achieves a drag coefficient of between 0.25 and 0.3. Sport utility vehicles (SUVs), with their typically boxy shapes, typically achieve a Cd=0.35–0.45. The drag coefficient of a vehicle is affected by the shape of body of the vehicle. Various other characteristics affect the coefficient of drag as well, and are taken into account in these examples. Many sports cars have a surprisingly high drag coefficient, as downforce implies drag, while others are designed to be highly aerodynamic in pursuit of a speed and efficiency, and as a result have much lower drag coefficients.

Note that the Cd of a given vehicle will vary depending on which wind tunnel it is measured in. Variations of up to 5% have been documented[6] and variations in test technique and analysis can also make a difference. So if the same vehicle with a drag coefficient of Cd=0.30 was measured in a different tunnel it could be anywhere from Cd=0.285 to Cd=0.315.


More information Calendar Year, Cd ...
Production Vehicles
Calendar YearAutomobile Cd
1938Volkswagen Beetle 0.48[7][8]
2018Jeep Wrangler (JL) 0.454[9]
2012Pagani Huayra 0.31 [10]
2019Toyota Corolla (E210, UK) 0.31 [11]
2001Toyota Prius 0.29[12]
2005Chevrolet Corvette C6 0.286[13]
2019Porsche Taycan Turbo 0.22[14][a]
2023Tesla Model 3 0.219[15]
2016Tesla Model S 0.208 [16]
2021Mercedes-Benz EQS 0.20[17][b]
2022Lucid Air 0.197[18][c]
2024Xiaomi SU7 0.195[19]
1996General Motors EV1 0.19[20]
Close


More information Calendar Year, Cd ...
Concept and Experimental Vehicles
Calendar YearAutomobile Cd
1952Alfa Romeo Disco Volante 0.26
1933Dymaxion Car 0.25
1954Alfa Romeo B.A.T. 7 Concept 0.19 [21]
2021Aptera SEV (2019 relaunch) 0.13[22]
2000General Motors Precept Concept 0.16 [23]
2022Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX 0.170 [24]
2013Volkswagen XL1 0.19[25]
2018Ecorunner 8 (Shell Eco-marathon) Prototype 0.045
2022Sunswift 7 0.095[26][27]
Close


More information CdA sqft, CdA m2 ...
Automobile examples of CdA[28]
CdA sqftCdA m2Automobile model
3.00 sq ft0.279 m22011 Volkswagen XL1
3.95 sq ft0.367 m21996 GM EV1
5.52 sq ft0.513 m22019 Porsche Taycan Turbo[14]
6.0 sq ft0.56 m22001 Honda Insight[29]
6.05 sq ft0.562 m22012 Tesla Model S P85[29]
6.20 sq ft0.576 m22014 Toyota Prius[29]
8.79 sq ft0.817 m21956 Citroën DS Spécial[30]
13.0 sq ft1.21 m22019 Ram 1500[31]
17 sq ft1.6 m22013 Mercedes-Benz G-Class[32]
Close


More information CdA sqft, CdA m2 ...
Concept/experimental cars
CdA sqftCdA m2Automobile model
0.21 sq ft0.020 m2Pac-car II[33]
2.04 sq ft0.190 m22011 Aptera 2 Series[34]
Close

See also

Notes

  1. in Range mode in combination with a low level and closed air intake flaps
  2. w/ 19-inch AMG wheel/tire combination in "Sport" driving mode
  3. w/ 19-inch wheel/tire combination

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.