Remove ads
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 2012 Texas House of Representatives elections took place as part of the biennial United States elections. Texas voters elected state senators in all 150 State House of Representatives districts. The winners of this election served in the 83rd Texas Legislature, with seats apportioned according to the 2010 United States census. State representatives serve for two-year terms.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 150 seats in the Texas House of Representatives 76 seats needed for a majority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Republican hold Democratic hold Democratic gain Republican: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% ≥90% Democratic: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% ≥90% |
At the beginning of the Eighty-second Texas Legislature following the 2010 Texas State House of Representatives elections, the Democrats held 49 seats to the Republicans' 101.
As of 2022, this is the last time Democrats won a state house seat in Chambers or Galveston county. This is also the first time a Republican has ever won a state house seat in Jefferson County (although the incumbent was a former Democrat who switched parties after winning re-election in 2010).[1][2]
Following the 2010 United States census, the Texas Legislature underwent its decennial redistricting. Due to Texas's shifting population from rural and urban areas to suburban areas, many rural representatives became vulnerable to having their districts moved across the state. Although Republicans had ousted almost every Democrat representing rural Texas in the 2010 elections, those gains were temporary, as many of the regions they won had lost population over the last decade. As such, it was seen as unlikely that Republicans would be able to draw maps that would allow them to maintain their supermajority in the chamber after the 2012 elections, despite their full control over the redistricting process.[3]
Texas House of Representatives districts follow the "county line rule," effectively granting individual counties delegations of state house seats based on their population.[4] The census found that Texas had a population of 25,145,561 in 2010,[5] giving each district an "ideal population" of 167,637 people. In 2000, the "ideal population for a district" was 139,006 people. Counties with at least this number of people must fully contain at least one state house district. Counties with sufficient population for two or more districts must be divided into that number of districts. Should a county have sufficient population for one or more district plus a fraction of another, one district from another county may extend into it to represent the remaining population. District delegations for counties with at least one district changed as follows following the 2010 Census:[6]
County | 2000 pop.[7] | Seats | Partial | 2010 pop.[7] | Seats | Partial | +/– W | +/– P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bell County | 238,000 | 1 | Yes | 310,235 | 1 | Yes | ||
Bexar County | 1,393,035 | 10 | No | 1,714,773 | 10 | No | ||
Brazoria County | 241,805 | 1 | Yes | 313,166 | 1 | Yes | ||
Brazos County | 152,436 | 1 | Yes | 194,851 | 1 | Yes | ||
Cameron County | 334,884 | 2 | Yes | 406,220 | 2 | Yes | ||
Collin County | 491,272 | 3 | Yes | 782,341 | 4 | Yes | 1 | |
Dallas County | 2,216,808 | 16 | No | 2,368,139 | 14 | No | 2 | |
Denton County | 433,065 | 3 | No | 662,614 | 4 | No | 1 | |
El Paso County | 679,568 | 5 | No | 800,647 | 5 | No | ||
Fort Bend County | 354,286 | 2 | Yes | 585,375 | 3 | Yes | 1 | |
Galveston County | 250,178 | 1 | Yes | 291,309 | 1 | Yes | ||
Harris County | 3,401,139 | 25 | No | 4,092,459 | 24 | No | 1 | |
Hidalgo County | 569,099 | 4 | No | 774,769 | 4 | Yes | ||
Jefferson County | 251,968 | 1 | Yes | 252,273 | 1 | Yes | ||
Lubbock County | 242,644 | 1 | Yes | 278,831 | 1 | Yes | ||
McLennan County | 213,525 | 1 | Yes | 234,906 | 1 | Yes | ||
Montgomery County | 293,779 | 2 | Yes | 455,746 | 2 | Yes | ||
Nueces County | 313,512 | 2 | Yes | 340,223 | 2 | No | ||
Smith County | 174,861 | 1 | Yes | 209,714 | 1 | Yes | ||
Tarrant County | 1,449,290 | 10 | No | 1,809,034 | 11 | No | 1 | |
Travis County | 811,776 | 6 | No | 1,024,266 | 6 | No | ||
Webb County | 193,124 | 1 | Yes | 250,304 | 1 | Yes | ||
Williamson County | 250,466 | 1 | Yes | 422,679 | 2 | Yes | 1 |
As a result of these changes, the following districts drastically moved:
Despite the rising Latino vote's potential to help the Democratic party and the falling approval ratings of Republican governor Rick Perry, analysts did not expect these to be enough to make the chamber remotely competitive.
Party | Candi- dates |
Votes | % | Seats | +/– | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican Party | 117 | 4,237,987 | 62.37% | 95 | 7 | |||||||||
Democratic Party | 86 | 2,272,530 | 33.45% | 55 | 7 | |||||||||
Libertarian Party | 38 | 230,008 | 3.9% | 0 | – | |||||||||
Green Party | 13 | 53,189 | 0.78% | 0 | – | |||||||||
Write-in | 1 | 715 | 0.01% | 0 | – | |||||||||
Total | 6,794,519 | 100.00% | 150 | – |
Seats where the margin of victory was under 10%:
District 43: Representative J.M. Lozano (D-Kingsville) was re-elected as a Democrat in 2010 with 77.90% of the vote. On March 5, 2012, he announced that he would switch parties and seek re-election as a Republican.[9] He would later go on to narrowly win re-election in 2012 with 51.55% of the vote.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | J.M. Lozano | 24,074 | 51.55% | |
Democratic | Yvonne Gonzalez Toureilles | 22.629 | 48.45% | |
Total votes | 46,703 | 100.00% | ||
Republican hold |
District | Democratic | Republican | Others | Total | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | ||
District 1 | - | - | 42,080 | 82.64% | 8,839 | 17.36% | 50,919 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 2 | - | - | 46,025 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,025 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 3 | - | - | 46,383 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,383 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 4 | - | - | 44,181 | 100.00% | - | - | 44,181 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 5 | - | - | 46,204 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,204 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 6 | - | - | 42,499 | 88.76% | 5,380 | 11.24% | 47,879 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 7 | - | - | 41,727 | 100.00% | - | - | 41,727 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 8 | 13,339 | 27.04% | 35,996 | 72.96% | - | - | 49,335 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 9 | - | - | 49,027 | 98.56% | 715 | 1.44% | 49,742 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 10 | - | - | 46,051 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,051 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 11 | - | - | 40,962 | 100.00% | - | - | 40,962 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 12 | 21,793 | 43.11% | 28,762 | 56.89% | - | - | 50,555 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 13 | - | - | 53,503 | 100.00% | - | - | 53,503 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 14 | 14,614 | 36.22% | 24,269 | 60.15% | 1,463 | 3.63% | 40,346 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 15 | - | - | 57,520 | 86.64% | 8,872 | 13.36% | 66,392 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 16 | - | - | 46,983 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,983 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 17 | 18,837 | 37.76% | 31,055 | 62.24% | - | - | 49,982 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 18 | - | - | 38,703 | 100.00% | - | - | 38,703 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 19 | - | - | 51,674 | 100.00% | - | - | 51,674 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 20 | - | - | 51,554 | 100.00% | - | - | 51,554 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 21 | - | - | 51,104 | 100.00% | - | - | 51,104 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 22 | 40,467 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 40,467 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 23 | 30,423 | 53.93% | 25,987 | 46.07% | - | - | 56,410 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 24 | 17,565 | 26.72% | 48,177 | 73.28% | - | - | 65,742 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 25 | - | - | 41,421 | 100.00% | - | - | 41,421 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 26 | 22,662 | 37.03% | 38,541 | 62.97% | - | - | 61,203 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 27 | 42,304 | 68.96% | 18,119 | 29.54% | 920 | 1.50% | 61,343 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 28 | - | - | 44,932 | 100.00% | - | - | 44,932 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 29 | 21,388 | 34.48% | 40,642 | 65.52% | - | - | 62,030 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 30 | 17,750 | 31.67% | 38,304 | 68.33% | - | - | 56,054 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 31 | 27,856 | 66.29% | 14,163 | 33.71% | - | - | 42,019 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 32 | - | - | 35,094 | 100.00% | - | - | 35,094 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 33 | - | - | 50,631 | 85.34% | 8,701 | 14.66% | 59,332 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 34 | 25,482 | 57.17% | 19,088 | 42.83% | - | - | 44,570 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 35 | 22,329 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 22,329 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 36 | 23,385 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 23,385 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 37 | 22,076 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 22,076 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 38 | 22,408 | 70.76% | 7,984 | 25.21% | 1,274 | 4.02% | 31,666 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 39 | 23,909 | 77.64% | 6,886 | 22.36% | - | - | 30,795 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 40 | 20,513 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 20,513 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 41 | 20,963 | 61.73% | 12,998 | 38.27% | - | - | 33,961 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 42 | 30,018 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 30,018 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 43 | 22,629 | 48.45% | 24,074 | 51.55% | - | - | 46,703 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 44 | - | - | 49,930 | 100.00% | - | - | 49,930 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 45 | 26,557 | 42.39% | 33,604 | 53.63% | 2,495 | 3.98% | 62,656 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 46 | 35,560 | 86.45% | - | - | 5,572 | 13.55% | 41,132 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 47 | 31,294 | 36.93% | 49,220 | 58.09% | 4,216 | 4.98% | 84,730 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 48 | 46,512 | 59.20% | 27,922 | 35.54% | 4,134 | 5.26% | 78,568 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 49 | 50,973 | 82.73% | - | - | 10,640 | 17.27% | 61,613 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 50 | 41,035 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 41,035 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 51 | 32,878 | 88.17% | - | - | 4,411 | 11.83% | 37,289 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 52 | - | - | 31,991 | 70.28% | 13,526 | 29.72% | 45,517 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 53 | - | 53,539 | 100.00% | - | - | 53,539 | 100.00% | Republican hold | |
District 54 | 19,879 | 42.49% | 26,910 | 57.51% | - | - | 46,789 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 55 | - | - | 32,153 | 100.00% | - | - | 32,153 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 56 | - | - | 38,528 | 79.47% | 9,954 | 20.53% | 48,482 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 57 | - | - | 43,042 | 100.00% | - | - | 43,042 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 58 | - | - | 45,861 | 100.00% | - | - | 45,861 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 59 | 10,212 | 21.77% | 36,706 | 78.23% | - | - | 46,918 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 60 | - | - | 55,404 | 100.00% | - | - | 55,404 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 61 | - | - | 55,737 | 88.91% | 6,954 | 11.09% | 62,691 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 62 | 12,928 | 24.32% | 40,219 | 75.68% | - | 53,147 | 100.00% | Republican hold | |
District 63 | - | - | 51,500 | 85.31% | 8,865 | 14.69% | 60,365 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 64 | 19,275 | 34.39% | 34,245 | 61.10% | 2,526 | 4.51% | 56,046 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 65 | 20,481 | 38.58% | 31,386 | 59.12% | 1,224 | 2.31% | 53,091 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 66 | - | - | 42,012 | 100.00% | - | 42,012 | 100.00% | Republican hold | |
District 67 | - | - | 42,594 | 100.00% | - | - | 42,594 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 68 | - | - | 39,191 | 100.00% | - | - | 39,191 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 69 | - | - | 38,980 | 87.06% | 5,795 | 12.94% | 44,775 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 70 | - | - | 46,997 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,997 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 71 | - | - | 44,271 | 100.00% | - | - | 44,271 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 72 | - | - | 43,886 | 100.00% | - | - | 43,886 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 73 | - | - | 64,029 | 88.20% | 8,565 | 11.80% | 72,594 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 74 | 22,666 | 60.38% | 14,870 | 39.62% | - | 37,536 | 100.00% | Democratic hold | |
District 75 | 19,789 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 19,789 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 76 | 27,050 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 27,050 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 77 | 24,180 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 24,180 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 78 | 22,650 | 53.83% | 19,430 | 46.17% | - | - | 42,080 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 79 | 27,832 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 27,832 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 80 | 29,963 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 29,963 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 81 | - | - | 34,154 | 100.00% | - | - | 34,154 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 82 | - | - | 42,572 | 100.00% | - | - | 42,572 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 83 | - | - | 49,332 | 100.00% | - | - | 49,332 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 84 | - | - | 33,179 | 82.58% | 6,999 | 17.42% | 40,178 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 85 | 20,435 | 41.65% | 28,626 | 58.35% | - | - | 49,061 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 86 | - | - | 53,287 | 100.00% | - | - | 53,287 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 87 | 9,567 | 22.71% | 32,564 | 77.29% | - | - | 42,131 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 88 | - | - | 39,941 | 100.00% | - | - | 39,941 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 89 | - | - | 46,621 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,621 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 90 | 17,597 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 17,597 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 91 | - | - | 40,058 | 100.00% | - | - | 40,058 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 92 | - | - | 37,084 | 80.67% | 8,884 | 19.33% | 45,968 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 93 | 18,797 | 37.52% | 29,527 | 58.95% | 1,768 | 3.53% | 50,092 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 94 | - | - | 42,208 | 82.21% | 9,133 | 17.79% | 51,341 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 95 | 37,594 | 77.36% | 11,004 | 22.64% | - | - | 48,598 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 96 | - | - | 36,940 | 80.53% | 8,931 | 19.47% | 45,871 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 97 | 24,159 | 37.65% | 38,139 | 59.43% | 1,873 | 2.92% | 64,171 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 98 | - | - | 57,539 | 85.58% | 9,694 | 14.42% | 67,233 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 99 | 16,763 | 30.21% | 36,715 | 66.17% | 2,009 | 3.62% | 55,487 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 100 | 34,965 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 34,965 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 101 | 28,943 | 87.90% | - | - | 3,984 | 12.10% | 32,927 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 102 | 22,736 | 42.87% | 30,303 | 57.13% | - | - | 53,039 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 103 | 22,287 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 22,287 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 104 | 22,544 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 22,544 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 105 | 20,923 | 48.26% | 21,705 | 50.07% | 725 | 1.67% | 43,353 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 106 | - | - | 41,785 | 83.17% | 8,455 | 16.83% | 50,240 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 107 | 25,018 | 49.16% | 25,868 | 50.84% | - | - | 50,886 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 108 | - | - | 43,675 | 79.69% | 11,133 | 20.31% | 54,808 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 109 | 53,982 | 93.59% | - | - | 3,700 | 6.41% | 57,682 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 110 | 33,972 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 33,972 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 111 | 47,498 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 47,498 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 112 | - | - | 32,515 | 100.00% | - | - | 32,515 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 113 | - | - | 28,727 | 80.94% | 6,763 | 19.06% | 35,490 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 114 | 28,762 | 45.85% | 33,970 | 54.15% | - | - | 62,732 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 115 | 21,784 | 41.43% | 29,082 | 55.31% | 1,711 | 3.25% | 52,577 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 116 | 31,006 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 31,006 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 117 | 22,397 | 53.82% | 19,214 | 46.18% | - | - | 41,611 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 118 | 23,992 | 59.85% | 16,095 | 40.15% | - | - | 40,087 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 119 | 25,130 | 61.89% | 15,473 | 38.11% | - | - | 40,603 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 120 | 33,756 | 87.89% | - | - | 4,651 | 12.11% | 38,407 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 121 | - | - | 50,530 | 80.24% | 12,444 | 19.76% | 62,974 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 122 | - | - | 66,679 | 100.00% | - | - | 66,679 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 123 | 32,958 | 87.52% | - | - | 4,700 | 12.48% | 37,658 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 124 | 31,915 | 84.93% | - | - | 5,661 | 15.07% | 37,576 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 125 | 28,857 | 61.19% | 17,501 | 37.11% | 799 | 1.69% | 47,157 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 126 | - | - | 40,311 | 100.00% | - | - | 40,311 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 127 | 19,435 | 29.79% | 45,813 | 70.21% | - | - | 65,248 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 128 | - | - | 42,682 | 100.00% | - | - | 42,682 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 129 | - | - | 46,438 | 100.00% | - | - | 46,438 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 130 | - | - | 54,596 | 90.15% | 5,967 | 9.85% | 60,563 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 131 | 36,765 | 94.50% | - | - | 2,139 | 5.50% | 38,904 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 132 | - | - | 33,592 | 80.69% | 8,037 | 19.31% | 41,629 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 133 | - | - | 52,050 | 84.97% | 9,210 | 15.03% | 61,260 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 134 | 36,480 | 45.36% | 43,944 | 54.64% | - | - | 80,424 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 135 | 21,030 | 39.64% | 32,023 | 60.36% | - | - | 53,053 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 136 | 24,851 | 40.72% | 32,383 | 53.06% | 3,802 | 6.23% | 61,036 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 137 | 15,832 | 65.76% | 8,245 | 34.24% | - | - | 24,077 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 138 | - | - | 29,645 | 80.45% | 7,202 | 19.55% | 36,847 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 139 | 39,022 | 77.08% | 11,604 | 22.92% | - | - | 50,626 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 140 | 18,320 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 18,320 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 141 | 33,180 | 87.85% | 4,587 | 12.15% | - | - | 37,767 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 142 | 34,010 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 34,010 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 143 | 21,869 | 72.94% | 8,112 | 27.06% | - | - | 29,981 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 144 | 12,446 | 52.07% | 10,885 | 45.54% | 573 | 2.40% | 23,904 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 145 | 20,892 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 20,892 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 146 | 40,724 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 40,724 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 147 | 43,589 | 92.21% | - | - | 3,683 | 7.79% | 47,272 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 148 | 25,964 | 85.96% | - | - | 4,241 | 14.04% | 30,205 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 149 | 26,017 | 61.12% | 16,551 | 38.88% | - | - | 42,568 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 150 | 19,343 | 30.32% | 44,454 | 69.68% | - | - | 63,797 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
Total | 2,272,530 | 33.45% | 4,237,987 | 62.37% | 283,912 | 4.18% | 6,794,253 | 100.00% | Source:[10] |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.