User talk:Ancheta Wis/e
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- In the case of Raspberry Pi, which is a board with an SoC, page 5 of a Raspberry Pi 4 compilation (BCM2835 ARM Peripherals data sheet) shows that the Pi's hardware uses multiple memory mapping schemes for its board: 1) system bus addresses 2) physical addresses 3) virtual addresses in Linux (kernel-mode, and user-mode). This SoC on a board implements a Linux OS in its hardware; while we think of the software on our own terms, the manufacturer is integrating (ARM/Broadcom/other devices) on the Raspberry Pi board. The data sheet (p.6) states that the peripheral addresses are system bus addresses; the software which accesses peripherals directly must translate the bus addresses into physical addresses or virtual addresses.
- One could postulate SoCs out there, which might accomplish a higher level of integration than a Raspberry Pi 4 board, with gigabytes of on-chip memory and wireless ethernet talking to our phone/laptops as peripheral devices, but right now that kind of SoC would be much more expensive than a Raspberry Pi 4 board, which was designed for students/enthusiasts during the past decade. In the future, this kind of SoC might become commonplace. We can't buy such an SoC off-the-shelf right now.
- The reformats are affecting the footnotes. When I use NavPop to read the footnotes, for example (Lakatos 1976) I can no longer read the note at the same time as the text. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 01:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC) I do see the CS1 error, instead. Here is some history on the lack of a page number on Lakatos 1976: The ideas took some time for me (at the time, I checked out the book from the library and re-read the passages until they clicked), but what I finally understood are in the Proofs and Refutations article. I just found a pdf with some page numbers: 10-11, which pertain to Proofs and Refutations. I have learned that <ref name= someName group= Note> can be used to separate notes and refs. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 03:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC) — I have a proposal: in parallel with the [1] work, when a CS1 flagged error in a NavPop appears, that I re-format the flagged footnote into types. Those types could be: Notes | Citations | Sources, etc. The refs themselves would use the <ref name= aRefName group= aNote >etc.</ref>{{rp|page number, etc,}} technique. This would keep the re-formatting effort intact, while footnotes and links remain readable. (The proposed types come from the formatting of today's Featured article.) If this proposal interferes with the re-formatting, I could wait.