Loading AI tools
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Crisis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 14:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
- Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
- News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
- WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 08:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
- News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
- Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 09:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
- From the editor: Writers needed
- Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
- Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 20:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.
- License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
- News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.
- Pool A
Shoemaker's Holiday (647)
- Pool B
ThinkBlue (247)
- Pool C
Theleftorium (455)
- Pool D
Candlewicke (539)
- Pool E
Durova (479)
- Pool F
Sasata (961)
- Current Wildcards
Useight (393)
Scorpion0422 (372)
Rlevse (329)
Wrestlinglover (307)
Paxse (285)
Ottava Rima (248)
Mitchazenia (226)
Juliancolton (181)
the_ed17 (179)
J Milburn (168)
Bedford (156)
Gary King (147)
97198 (142)
Ceranthor (111)
Tinucherian (106)
Matthewedwards (98)
GARDEN , iMatthew : Chat , and The Helpful One The Helpful Bot 00:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 14:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.
Regarding Talk:Desert Eagle, You will find that removing content that violates talk page guidelines is in fact constructive and fully in line with guidelines and you don't pay attention to what you're doing or notice when an edit summary is a joke. If you are confused, Wikipedia is not a forum. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but "That was an auto warning from Huggle" is a meaningless statement. If you are using a bot or script to automatically accuse people of vandalism, you need to make sure
- The system notifies the "vandal" that the message is automated by a bot or script rather than by a human who isn't paying attention
- The system knows the difference between vandalism and an edit summary
- I generally tend to assume people are capable of reading the actual edit and in the past this had always proved the case. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- I would think to reach the conclusion that the summary was insulting people would have required reading the edit; otherwise the assumption would have been I had added a bad joke or something. Either way, we can agree that hastily auto-processing edits and then discussing the results with me is much faster than briefly skimming the edit and realizing it isn't vandalism. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Was it? I guess you'd have to read the edit to be sure. I'm certain if it was an attack it was vicious, scathing, and completely baseless. He does seem to clearly be more interested in vandalism than improving Wikipedia while having a sense of humor. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 17:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- I would think to reach the conclusion that the summary was insulting people would have required reading the edit; otherwise the assumption would have been I had added a bad joke or something. Either way, we can agree that hastily auto-processing edits and then discussing the results with me is much faster than briefly skimming the edit and realizing it isn't vandalism. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi there STRAIGHT EDGE, this is VASCO from Portugal,
Now i am logged in, but edited here anonymously, and received a message from you, about civility. Although i'll admit i was out of order, this "person" which i attacked deserves nothing more but contempt, he does not want to work as a team, does not respond to a single message, does not write a single edit summary, etc, etc.
Do not believe me? It's fair, but have a look at this, incredible i'll say!! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pararubbas/Archive). Tell me, how does this "person" deserve to be treated?
Have a nice week, sorry 4 any incovenience,
VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
If you look at the change, I was merely removing irrelevant vandalism! I didn't bother to log in, hence IP 82.21.210.149. Cheers, Neale Neale Monks (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Browsing the archives
- Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
- Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
- News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
