United States v. Councilman
Criminal case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about United States v. Councilman?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
United States v. Councilman, 373 F.3d 197 (1st Cir. 2004),[1] reversed en banc, 418 F.3d 67 (1st Cir. 2005),[2] was a criminal case involving interception of e-mail while in temporary storage en route to its final destination. Earlier rulings in the case had raised concerns about the privacy of e-mail and the effectiveness of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA).
Quick Facts United States v. Councilman, Court ...
United States v. Councilman | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit |
Full case name | United States of America v. Bradford C. Councilman |
Argued | December 3, 2003 |
Decided | June 29, 2004 |
Citation(s) | Panel opinion: 373 F.3d 197 En banc opinion: 418 F.3d 67 |
Case history | |
Prior history | 245 F. Supp. 2d 319 (D. Mass. 2003) |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Panel: Juan R. Torruella, Conrad K. Cyr, Kermit Lipez En banc: Michael Boudin, Torruella, Bruce M. Selya, Cyr, Sandra Lynch, Lipez, Jeffrey R. Howard |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Panel: Torruella, joined by Cyr |
Majority | En banc: Lipez, joined by Boudin, Selya, Lynch, Howard |
Dissent | Panel: Lipez |
Dissent | En banc: Torruella, joined by Cyr |
Laws applied | |
Electronic Communications Privacy Act |
Close