Talk:Hainan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does anyone else agree that we shoudl revert to the last edit of this page? IT seems a lot of content was removed. Was there a reason for this? And the "Welcome to hainan" line is un-encyclopaedic, IMHO.--Mishac 02:11, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Menchi 03:10, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
some horrible person has emptied the entire article and replaced it with a japanese flag! what is the meaning of this?
The section on Geography notes that Hainan contains not only Hainan Island but also 200 islands of the South China Sea.
I think it needs to be made clear here that this is the claim made by the PRC, which is contested by a number of nations. I don't think that at this present stage the PRC claim is internationally recognised. --Anon
- Done. I just dragged the 2nd part of the sentence ("in the PRC territory") to be the 1st part of the sentence. Is that clearer? --Menchi 04:45, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I don't think it exists anymore. I went to Hainan (my relatives live there)a few years ago and there was a new airport built to replace the old one. I don't know if they still call it Meilan, I'm sure they changed it. The airport's south of Haikou in the countryside.
The airport is still called Meilan. It is in the countryside towards the east.Bathrobe 06:20, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Is this a real historical, regional or separatist flag of Hainan? -- Himasaram 02:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
According to crwflags.com, this is a war flag used by the Li and Miao ethnic groups of Hainan from 1943 to 1949. -- ran (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Makes sense. As per the law of PRC, all local level government entities (provinces, cities etc.) are forbidden from having any flags.
Except Special Administrative Regions (Hong Kong ＆ Macau), but this makes sense due to colonial history and extremely high degree of autonomy. Dupengfei108 (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
I am removing all the links to travel-hainan.com, because they are links to a commercial website with absolutely no relevant information available, unless you pay $30 to download a PDF file from them.
And in fact the links appear to be inserted in odd places, as if they are trying to build keyword strength with Google; this looks like spam to me.
Don't some Yi people also live in Hainan? Badagnani 10:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
How can an article on such a significant part of China lack pictures?? Manderiko (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Tell me what you need and I will try to take some.--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
The table in that section appears confusing and doesn't seem to offer much useful information. I suggest swapping it for this image.--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. I changed it. The new map I just added seems incomplete. If anyone can fill in the blanks and needs the image without the red lines so they can move things about, please leave me a message on my talk page and I will upload it.--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Second to last paragraph states "...put Hainan's pursuit of provincial status under a cloud." I don't know what that means and the text is unsourced. Any suggestions?--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Should Yalong Bay National Resort District be mentioned in the first paragraph of Tourism section? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- I never heard of Yanoda. If you give me the names, I will add them. Is it Yanoda district? Capitals? Lower case?
- Yalong Bay National Resort District
- Yanoda resort district
- ?
- Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
The group number is 11934212,the group name is 巫溪海南CHARISMA. We welcome foreigners who are interested about Wuxi County and Hainan province or currently learning Chinese to enlist! We tutor you Chinese and make exchange with inhabitants of Wuxi and Hainan province. We give you lucid explanation of Mandarin and dialect of Chongqing. We offer lodger, tourism information of Wuxi and Hainan province and even lore. We also offer lurid details of Wuxi and Hainan news.
- I will remove the section. Please get consensus here for possibly adding it to external links. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey,what do you mean? You don't have to do that! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.151.153.105 (talk) 06:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to modify the sections. Here's how they are now:
- 1 History
- 2 Geography
- 2.1 Location and area
- 2.2 Population
- 2.3 Administrative
- 3 Climate
- 4 Rivers and lakes
- 5 Subdivisions
- 6 Politics
- 7 Government
- 8 Economy
- 8.1 Real estate market
- 8.2 Economic and technological development zones
- 9 Military
- 10 Natural resources
- 11 Agriculture
- 12 Commercial fishing
- 13 Transportation
- 13.1 Road
- 13.2 Air
- 13.3 Rail
- 13.4 Seaports
- 14 Culture
- 15 Media
- 16 Education
- 17 Demographics
- 17.1 Languages
- 18 Cuisine
- 19 Tourism
- 19.1 Yachting
- 19.2 Historical sites
- 19.3 Other attractions and destinations
- 19.4 Statistics
- 20 Space centre
- 21 Miscellaneous topics
- 22 Notable residents
- 23 See also
- 24 References
- 25 Further reading
- 26 External links
Issues:
- Rivers and lakes should go under Geology
- Natural resources could go under Geology, or nearby Geology or Economy
- Agriculture and Commercial fishing could go under Economy
- Politics, Government, Military are all related. They should at least be next to one another.
- No sports section?
- No flora fauna section?
- "Miscellaneous topics" is a bit sloppy-sounding.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- The entire organisation is sloppy. 1) "subdivisions" and "administrative geography" are basically interchangeable. 2) Climate, if anything, should be under Geography 3)No, rivers and lakes should be under Geography. An island/province is not a volcano...(Hainan doesn't have extinct volcanoes, does it?) 4) Yes, "Miscellaneous topics" could probably be "See Also" instead. 5) Population should be merged into Demographics. --HXL's Roundtable and Record 23:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hainan most certainly does have an extinct volcano. The Ma'an crater is the best preserved example of an inverted volcano in the world. Most of the north west of the island consists of volcanic rock. ► Philg88 ◄
talk 23:29, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hainan most certainly does have an extinct volcano. The Ma'an crater is the best preserved example of an inverted volcano in the world. Most of the north west of the island consists of volcanic rock. ► Philg88 ◄
- Does someone want to paste the above section layout below this thread showing suggestions for a better layout?
- FYI: I have a high-res topo map of the island coming that will boot the sad old images currently in the article. It's a dandy. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think we could learn a thing or two from Hawaii. It is a good model. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
PROPOSAL #1
- 1 History
- 2 Geography and environment
- Location and area --> becomes leading paragraph
- 2.1 Topography
- 2.1.1 Rivers and lakes
- 2.2 Flora and fauna
- 2.3 Climate
- 3 Demographics
- 3.1 Population
- 3.2 Languages
- 4 Government
- 4.1 Politics
- 4.2 Administrative
- 4.3 Subdivisions
- 4.4 Military
- 5 Economy
- 5.1 Economic and technological development zones
- 5.2 Natural resources
- 5.3 Agriculture
- 5.4 Commercial fishing --> rename to --> Fisheries
- 5.5 Real estate market
- 6 Transportation
- 6.1 Road
- 6.2 Air
- 6.3 Rail
- 6.4 Seaports
- 7 Culture
- 8 Media
- 9 Education
- 10 Cuisine
- 11 Tourism
- 11.1 Yachting
- 11.2 Historical sites
- 11.3 Other attractions and destinations
- 11.4 Statistics
- 12 Miscellaneous topics
- 12.1 Space centre
- 22 Notable residents
- 23 See also
- 24 References
- 25 Further reading
- 26 External links
- Endorse --HXL's Roundtable and Record 00:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Endorse ► Philg88 ◄ talk 03:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- (Others sections for future development could include: Protected areas and wildlife preserves, Health, Religion, Cost of living, and further expansion of content about new development on the island.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
By, the way, I meant geography, not geology. My mistake. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
I'll let others decide where to put it. Here she is:
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I placed it. Please rearrange as you see fit. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Well, I didn't even know we already had a decent topo sat map. Oh well, this new one is pretty decent. Also, it can be modified with cities and roads added, and thus could become the best public domain map of Hainan in existence. If anyone has GIMP or the like, and can stick a transparency of another map on top, this might be a good project.
A lot of the images are ill-placed. I will try to spread them out. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
These two don't offer much. I will ditch them. Please restore if you disagree. I won't mind.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. I rearranged the images, and did a crumby job. The skyline image is strangely placed because it is a modern city image in the history section. Maybe it should go into economy.
- The image of stupid boats in the seaport section isn't the best.
- A good image or two for the history section would be great. Some artifact, old drawing, or such. I'll check at commons. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
this has been more entertaining to read than much of the other work we all do in here in Wiki. BTW the shape of H island is a lot like some of the giant huge 1 mile long spaceships that Pilot Heijst imaged in august 2014. see google and youtube for links to it...search "Mystery Glow in Pacific Ocean Baffles Pilots"...the ET fleet was seen at 2 AM at night halfway from Japan to USA...near USSR. Thanks for all the work you all do in here...blondeignore Blondeignore (talk) 21:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I think they are really eye-catching, and visitors like them. Who cares if they repeat info in the article? They're supposed to. I encourage editors to lengthen the captions. I will too. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
MOS says:
- There are several criteria for a good caption. A good caption
- clearly identifies the subject of the picture, without detailing the obvious.
- is succinct.
- establishes the picture's relevance to the article.
- provides context for the picture.
- draws the reader into the article.
I'm thus trying to replace the current, obvious captions, and comply with above guidelines. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Please tweak, etc. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Do we really need two? Is there a way around this? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
It appears to be jammed into a little square box on the left hand side instead of a rectangle spanning the width of the page. Is this just my rendering? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
ResolvedAnna Frodesiak (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Some might be interested in seeing these sections:
- Protected areas and wildlife preserves
- Flora and fauna
Does anyone know a few park names, indigenous species, etc? List them here if you do, and I will make a lead sentence or two, and then the sections will be on their way. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Done Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
It took me 20 seconds to figure it out. First-time visitors won't ever figure it out. I think using the extra white space available to add additional frames of reference, and maybe words like "South China Sea" in blue would be good.Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
We need a section called Industry, as there is still no mention of:
- Jinhai Pulp Mill in Yangpu Economic Development Zone
- Changjiang Nuclear Power Plant
- That huge coal electric plant in Yangpu Economic Development Zone
- The petroleum something or other plant.
Add anything you have to the list, and I will start it. Or you start it. Either or. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
I split off the county-level part which is now County-level divisions of Hainan. Now, after adding content to the new Hainan Province navbox, it resembles Wales, Gibraltar, and Barbados. I split off the county-level part so that the Hainan Province navbox can be added to non-geographical articles.
Although the convention for other Chinese provinces seem to be simply geographical (example), I think that the new Hainan navbox will be useful to visitors. In lieu of portals, which I'm not a big fan of, hopefully other provinces will rename their navboxes from XXX Province to XXX Province Administrative Divisions etc., and start XXX Province navboxes in similar fashion to Hainan.
What do you think? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Sounds cool. ► Philg88 ◄ talk 07:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Two more things:
- Which articles should get the template?
- Should the template be renamed to Hainan topics (same as Wales, Gibraltar, and Barbados? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Two more things:
Done Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
hey,guys. I've checked the information about Hainan railways and it was clearly out of date. So I updated it with new information within the rail section. If there is any incorrect information, please let me know.Anyang umich (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Recently, these new categories were created:
- Category:Hainan Province
- Category:Geography of Hainan Province
- Category:Islands of Hainan Province
- Category:Rivers of Hainan Island
- Category:Bays of Hainan Island
- Category:Peninsulas of Hainan Island
Currently "Hainan" refers to both the province and the island. These newly created cats may not be needed.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I am going to go ahead and clean this up. I believe consensus should be required for these to exist. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Done
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
The six above are all red links now. Why do this without discussion? Why not even have the courtesy and provide redirects? Where can one now find all bay articles for Hainan Island - or at least for the province? Where can one now find all peninsula articles for Hainan Island - or at least for the province? What is the difference in effect when one looks at vandalizm to Hainan information? Isn't what you do similar? Huayu-Huayu (talk) 18:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- I deleted them, as they had no content and redundant to same named categories without "province". However if this discussion results in a decision to have them then they can be recreated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Answer the question: "Where can one now find all peninsula articles for Hainan Island - or at least for the province?" Huayu-Huayu (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Exactly. And please don't recreate them without consensus. Also, please, no more edits like this. You are linking to a redirect.
- Nothing exactly! There is wide spread consensus in Wikipedia to group peninsulas. Answer the question: "Where can one now find all peninsula articles for Hainan Island - or at least for the province?" Huayu-Huayu (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- If you wish to attempt to get consensus, fine, but that's step one. In fact, let's find out: Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- There is wide spread consensus to group peninsulas, you need consensus to /not/ group peninsulas. Huayu-Huayu (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
There was mention at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive736#"Taiwan" vs. "Republic of China" discussions but no actual discussion. So the D in WP:BRD can happen here:
Separate articles and categories for Hainan Island and Hainan Province
We would like opinions on whether or not we should have two sets of categories and articles for Hainan Province and Hainan Island.
- Oppose – Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose – Shrigley (talk) 02:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose – We often have a single article for an island and an administrative division named after the island but including a few extra smaller islands, e.g. Crete, Sicily, Sardinia, Prince Edward Island, Tasmania and Hokkaido. Saves pointless duplication. Kanguole 03:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose – No issue with "Hainan" referring to both the island and the province at all given the provincial authority governing the Administration Office for Xisha, Zhongsha, and Nansha Islands and the minor islands around Hainan Island has the same name as the main island itself. GotR Talk 04:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Here are a couple of threads related to this, which I hope can be continued here:
- User talk:Graeme Bartlett#How come a category gets deleted without discussion?
- User talk:Graeme Bartlett#Hainan-related cats
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
When Huayu-Huayu's block is over, it's possible that he will start changing Hainan-related articles again. It would be nice to have consensus on a few conventions to cite. Please agree/disagree/comment under each item. (I hope it's okay to squeeze in opinions under each item. It's fine by me.)
The issues:
1) Hainan Province vs. Hainan province
- I'm for the former, as it seems that all country articles use this, except for Provinces of Vietnam. It's proper, so should be upper case.
2) "Hainan Island"
- It exists, so is proper, and so should be upper case.
3) "...island of Hainan"
- Not proper, so lower case. I support starting to use the term "...main island of Hainan..." where disambiguation is needed.
4) "[[Hainan|Hainan Province]]" vs. "Hainan Province", and "[[Hainan|Hainan Island]]" vs. "Hainan Island"
- No pipe. We shouldn't confuse visitors by implying there's an article named Hainan XXX. "Hainan Province" delivers facts: that Wikipedia uses the term "Hainan" to refer to the province, and uses that term as the article title.
5) "Hainan Province" vs. "Hainan Province", and "Hainan Island" vs. "Hainan Island"
- This is an easy one. Always Hainan XXX. We shouldn't link to a redirect. We shouldn't confuse visitors by implying there's an article named Hainan XXX.
6) What do we do in cases like at the end of this paragraph? Should change it to Hainan Island, or Hainan Province, or "...the island province of Hainan..." or what? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to put you through all of this. I should have done it last week. It would have saved me a couple of hours of hassle. Just trying to prevent more hassle in the future. If there are any other issues I'm missing here, please state them. Many thanks to all. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Without input, I'm just going to wing it. So this is your chance to weigh in.
Here's the trouble: The recent listing of additional islands claimed by Hainan, but far away down south (section 3.1.1 Islands), throws a monkey wrench in the works. It automatically expands the scope. Visitors will now think that "Demographics" and all the other sections below, refer to all the islands. That's not true. Also, to compensate for the new islands section, sections have been renamed to: "Flora on Hainan Island" and "Fauna on Hainan Island". That's not right either. Those sections should now be "Flora on Hainan Island and all the little dinky islands just off shore".
We could use a solution. One solution is to move the whole section about the far away down south islands to the bottom of the article to a section called "Disputed islands far away down south", and to make some sort of statement in the Geography section, or further up to the tune of "Hainan refers to the main island and the little dinky islands just off shore, but claims a bunch of disputed islands far away down south". That sort of delimits the scope of this article.
Any suggestions? Your silence will be taken as consensus, and will unleash a flurry of organizational edits on my part. Sorry for the long post. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Need to clearly distinguish Hainan Province from Hainan Island. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 23:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Possibly "Flora on Hainan Island and nearby islands". I would prefer the section on the disputed islands be moved to "Subdivisions" (section 6.3), with a brief mention, but not a full list, of the dispute islands. This would be in the mould of the ROC article. And I think the claim that Hainan (in a provincial context) refers to the main island + offshore islands is equally as unreliable (as it stands now) as the previous sentence "To the people of China, Hainan refers to the main island"; sources ought to be provided here. And no, it's not long. Far from being too long, I must say. GotR Talk 04:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- By "Flora on Hainan Island and nearby islands", do you mean the dinky satellite islands? If so, we can make that clear at the beginning of Geography section. Then, the sections need only be called "Flora of Hainan" - how it used to be.
- Move to 6.3, dandy idea. Bury the list in a table if need be, or move it to a {{main}}. Just get it out of view of visitors lest it give the impression that the body of the article applies to them.
- "To the people of China, Hainan refers to the main island..." - Doesn't exist in the article. But "The name "Hainan" also refers to Hainan Island..." does. The whole mention of "Haidian Island", proper noun, causes confusion and isn't very helpful. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed that's what I mean. Perhaps even better would be to simply name the section "Flora", or is this too simple, sometimes naive?
- "To the people of China, Hainan refers to the main island..." - Doesn't exist in the article. But "The name "Hainan" also refers to Hainan Island..." does. The whole mention of "Haidian Island", proper noun, causes confusion and isn't very helpful. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Definitely use {{main}} to point to the full list, lest we give the impression that the disputed islands are a fully integral part of the province.
- The term "Hainan Island" is used by external sources, such as Accuweather, so it should remain in the lede as a term in bold. However, I agree that all subsequent mentions of that term should be avoided unless absolutely necessary for precision. GotR Talk 05:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- That sounds perfect to me. And maybe accompany the first and only mention of "Hainan Island" as a proper noun with something like "...and has a few satellite islands just offshore...", solidly defining the definition and scope. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Should this be an RfC? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Resolved, I think. See TOC. It should be quite clear to visitors. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
I have replaced the map featuring China's nine-dotted line, a signal of Chinese hegemony over the common sea of the world, which is illegal to be linked to articles of Wikipedia.--Vietlong (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- It's not an "illegal" map. It's POVy from a Viet perspective, but the Chinese can likewise call maps without their claims biased as well. I'd imagine Wikipedia's consensus would favor America's policy of not recognizing the Chinese claims but it might be accepted to use Chinese maps of Chinese claims for Chinese articles. Not sure. — LlywelynII 00:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
I wonder if Hainan might be a candidate for the original and legendary Hawaii, from which the polynesians claim they come? Is there any evidence in the archaeology to suggest polynesian inhabitants: stepped adzes and so on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.39.254 (talk) 10:31, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
According to several comments at File talk:South China Sea claims.jpg, the map of "Maritime claims of South China Sea" is incorrect (as well the map colours confusingly not matching the key). Should it be deleted? 86.171.174.107 (talk) 03:16, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Please see the Commons debate. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Daner Commandery and Zhuai Commandery should probably be spun off into entirely separate articles, but
- Loewe, Michael (2004), "Guangzhou: the Evidence of the Standard Histories from the Shi ji to the Chen shu, a Preliminary Survey", Guangdong: Archaeology and Early Texts (Zhou–Tang), Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 51–80, ISBN 3-447-05060-8.
has more details on them, including census returns and early records that Zhuai had to be abandoned not from "cost" but because the locals revolted owing to officials cutting off their attractive hair to make wigs for themselves.
In the same book,
- Wade, Geoff (2004), "Lady Sinn and the Southward Expansion of China in the Sixth Century", Guangdong: Archaeology and Early Texts (Zhou–Tang), Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 125–150, ISBN 3-447-05060-8.
reports that the identification of Han's Daner Commandery with Hainan's present Dan County is commonplace but not actually proven in the historical record, possibly having originally described ear-stretching people on the mainland. — LlywelynII 00:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Hainan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130727021210/http://www.stats.gov.cn:80/english/newsandcomingevents/t20110429_402722516.htm to http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/newsandcomingevents/t20110429_402722516.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111001102416/http://unn.people.com.cn/GB/13627264.html to http://unn.people.com.cn/GB/13627264.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111007232304/http://hainanrendezvous.com/en/ to http://hainanrendezvous.com/en/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
were there any Governors and Secretaries of the CPC from national minority in this province?--Kaiyr (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
This article is missing many citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juicebaby (talk • contribs) 07:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Where the heck is it? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
In the section listing locations that have partnerships with Hainan, Crimea is listed as a province of Ukraine. Due to the reality of the situation on the ground, it might be good to include a note that Crimea is currently occupied/administered by Russia. Of course, due to this change in administration, I am not sure whether the relationship between Crimea and Hainan still exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.17.249 (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
I removed unsourced content from 2013. Can anyone find sources to show river lengths? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:RGloucester, and others. Can we make this clearer? Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- I think it has been dealt with satisfactorily by subsequent edits. RGloucester — ☎ 21:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- That seems much better. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Needs treatment and sourcing for the former name "Dan'er". — LlywelynII 13:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
The General Secretary listed as current (Liu Cigui) retired. The real current one is Shen Xiaoming, ex-Governor, listed as current.
In turn, Feng Fei (冯飞) became the new Governor.
All data is available on Baidu Wiki and Chinese government websites.
It will be necessary to briefly edit Feng's, Shen's and Liu's pages as well finding out year or their new posting + Liu's retirement.
I will do it in a few days if nobody else can, consider this just a notification before an edit. Dupengfei108 (talk) 15:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
