Loading AI tools
Unofficial claim made by several cities in the United Kingdom From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The second city of the United Kingdom is typically held to be either Birmingham or Manchester, between which the title is disputed.[1][2][3][4] The title is unofficial and cultural and is often debated in the popular press between Birmingham, Manchester, and other candidates.
 | This article possibly contains original research. (August 2022) |
The United Kingdom has a primate city structure where London significantly surpasses other cities in size and importance and all other cities have much more in common with one another than with the capital,[5] but various cities have held some claim to the title of second city through history. Eboracum (York), the northern capital of Britannia Inferior, would have been considered the second city by virtue of its prominence in Roman times.[6] In medieval England, the second-largest city was Norwich. It was surpassed by Bristol in the seventeenth century. By the nineteenth century, the label "second city of the British Empire" had emerged and was widely applied to Dublin, the capital of Ireland.[7][8][9][10][11] Dublin was eclipsed over the coming decades by several rapidly industrialising cities in Britain.[12] Glasgow was sometimes described as the second city of the Empire during the Victorian era. Currently, Birmingham is commonly referred to as the UK's second city, although Manchester has also emerged as a contender.[13][1][2][3] Edinburgh, Cardiff, and Belfast also have alternative claims due to their status as capital cities of the other home nations.[14][15][16]
York was named the second city in earlier centuries, by virtue of its prominence in Roman times as the northern capital, Eboracum, of the Roman province of Britannia Inferior.[6]
The title Second City of the Empire or Second City of the British Empire was claimed by a number of cities in the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries. Commercial trading city Liverpool was regarded as holding this title with its massive port, merchant fleet and world-wide trading links.[17][18][19] Liverpool was constantly referred to as the New York of Europe.[20] Glasgow (which continues to use the title as a marketing slogan),[21][22] and (outside of Britain or Ireland) Calcutta (modern Kolkata)[23] and Philadelphia.[24]
Prior to the union with Scotland in 1707, from the English Civil War until the 18th century, Norwich was the second-largest city of the Kingdom of England, being a major trading centre, Britain's richest provincial city and county town of Norfolk, at that time the most populous county of England.[25] Bristol was the second-wealthiest city in England in the 16th century;[26] and by the 18th century, Bristol was often described as the second city of England.[27] During the 19th century, claims were made for Manchester,[28] Liverpool[29] and York.[30] By the early 19th century, Glasgow was frequently referred to as the second city;[31] and during much of the 20th century it had a population of over one million, larger than that of Birmingham until the 1951 census. For example, the Official Census population for Glasgow was 0.784 million in April 1911; 1.034 million in April 1921; 1.088 million in April 1931 and 1.090 million in April 1951.[32] However, slum clearance in the 1960s led to displacement of residents from the city centre to new communities located outside the city boundaries. This, together with local government reorganisation, resulted in the official population of Glasgow falling sharply. The Glasgow City Council area currently has a population of 600,000 although the surrounding conurbation of Greater Glasgow has a population of 1,199,629.[33] In contrast, the population of the city of Birmingham has remained steady around the one million mark; its central population fell like Glasgow's, but the city boundaries were extended several times in the early 20th century. Occasional claims were made for Liverpool,[34] Birmingham[35] and Manchester.[36]
Birmingham has generally been considered to be the second city of the United Kingdom since the time of World War I.[37] However, from the mid-twentieth century, Manchester has been pitched as a contender for the title.[37]
Birmingham is the more populous city and is recognised as such by His Majesty's Government.[38][39] However, confusion surrounding the correct way to define the two cities' populations, along with the publication of outdated, inaccurate or estimated population statistics, has sometimes led to erroneous comparisons between them.
According to the 2021 United Kingdom census, the City of Birmingham is the most populous local government district (and therefore in terms of population actually the UK’s largest City-proper) with a population of 1.145 million — substantially larger than the City of Manchester, which at 552,000 is only the sixth largest, behind Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow, Bradford and Sheffield.[40]
However, municipal boundaries are problematic for comparing modern cities: many suburbs of Bristol, Birmingham, Glasgow and Manchester fall outside city limits largely drawn up in Victorian times, and the surrounding conurbations and areas that can be considered part of each city are hard to define. Manchester is regarded as a particularly 'under-bounded' city, whose archaic boundaries no longer accurately reflect its true size.[41][42] To reflect this, the City of Manchester is sometimes conflated with Greater Manchester, the metropolitan county and combined authority which includes the neighbouring City of Salford and eight other metropolitan boroughs that broadly define the conurbation. According to the 2021 census, Greater Manchester had a total population of 2.868 million.[40] This is nonetheless marginally smaller than the equivalent metropolitan county and combined authority of the West Midlands, which comprises the cities of Birmingham, Coventry, Wolverhampton, and four other metropolitan boroughs, with a total combined population of 2.92 million.[40]
There are several drawbacks to this approach. The first is the arbitrary nature of the metropolitan county boundaries, which were drawn up in the early-1970s as administrative divisions and do not necessarily reflect the present state of either conurbation. A second drawback is the implication that each county is, in itself, homogeneous, thus ignoring the sensitivities of the distinct settlements which fall within the boundaries of the county but may not identify strongly with its principal city, for example the Black Country in the West Midlands,[43] or Bolton in Greater Manchester.[44] Relatedly, a third drawback is in the names of the counties themselves: Manchester has been able to leverage the name of its metropolitan county to build a cohesive "place brand",[45] whereas Birmingham's comparative sphere of influence tends to be hidden within the West Midlands moniker.[46]
In an attempt to circumvent the first of these drawbacks, the population of each city is sometimes taken to be the contiguous built-up urban area of their respective conurbations. According to a methodology defined by the Office for National Statistics in 2011, the Greater Manchester Built-up Area's population of 2.55 million is marginally bigger than that of the West Midlands conurbation, at 2.44 million. This disparity is explained by the area of green belt known as the Meriden Gap, which separates the City of Coventry from the rest of the West Midlands built-up area.[47]
An alternative methodology, based around the concept of primary urban areas, is used by Centre for Cities to publish urban policy research.[48] Primary urban areas are intended to allow economic and social comparisons between cities, using definitions less arbitrary than the administrative boundaries of local authorities, but avoiding some of the issues associated with agglomerating distinct urban settlements into single cities.[49] According to the Centre for Cities Data Tool, Birmingham's population in 2020 was 2.56 million, marginally ahead of Manchester's 2.52 million.[50]
At other times, the wider metropolitan areas of the two cities are considered. Compared directly, the Birmingham Metropolitan Area is the larger of the two, with an estimated 2021 population of 4.34 million as opposed to Manchester's 3.1 million.[51]
The media typically describe Birmingham as the second city.
Reporting on the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games in July and August 2022, ten of the twelve nationally distributed daily newspapers in the United Kingdom published articles referring to Birmingham as the "second city" of either the United Kingdom, Britain or England: The Times,[52] The Daily Telegraph,[53] The i,[54] The Guardian,[55] The Independent,[56] and The Daily Mirror.[57] The same phrasing appeared in the freesheet press, including The Metro[58] and City A.M.,[59] regional publications including The London Evening Standard,[60] The Scottish Herald,[61] The Northern Echo[62] and The Yorkshire Post,[63] special interest publications including The Voice,[64] and a number of international publications including The New Zealand Herald,[65] The Times Colonist[66] and The National.[67] Publications including The Financial Times[68] and The Scotsman[69] have also referred to Birmingham's second city status.
During the same period, the BBC published a "Brummies' guide to Birmingham and beyond" which contained the subheading "Something for everyone in the second city",[70] while Sky published a legacy piece discussing the concerns of "people who live in Britain's second city".[71] Other national broadcasters whose websites have, at different times, referred to Birmingham as the second city include ITV,[72] and Channel 4.[73]
Since 2010, major international news providers including Reuters,[74][75] The Associated Press,[76][77] Agence France-Presse,[78][79] Bloomberg News,[80] CNN International,[81] Al Jazeera[82] and The New York Times Company[83] have all referred to Birmingham as the second city of either Britain or England, although the descriptor "second-largest city" is also frequently seen. In 2019, an article in the New York Times suggested both Liverpool and Manchester might lay claim to being England's cultural second city.[84]
Travel and events publications including Lonely Planet,[85] Rough Guides[86] and Time Out[87] refer to Birmingham as the second city.
As the second city is an unofficial title and one of subjective opinion, a number of polls have been conducted over the years. Despite Birmingham being viewed as the traditional second city, public polls have shown a slight preference for Manchester since 2000:
Although the government does not publish policy on the matter, ministers have tended to endorse Birmingham's status as the country's second city.
A notable exception was John Prescott, former Deputy Prime Minister and Member of Parliament for the constituency of Kingston upon Hull East, who concluded a conference speech in Manchester in 2007 with the words "...Manchester – our second city", although this was later played down by his department, claiming they were made in a "light-hearted context".[97] Prescott had previously declared Birmingham the second city while on a visit to the newly built Bullring Shopping Centre in 2003.
At different times, MPs representing constituencies in Manchester and Glasgow have spoken out in support of their respective cities' claims:
However, in 2007, Phil Woolas MP for the constituency of Oldham East and Saddleworth, former Minister of State for the Environment, appeared to concede the second city title to Birmingham, remarking: "And, of course, I, and colleagues in Manchester, am pleased to see its very sensible plans to relocate to Manchester – Britain's third city."[98]
Most recently, MP for Solihull, Julian Knight conceded that people see Manchester as England's second city but argued that "Birmingham is bigger, more diverse and frankly a more interesting place to be." He suggested that the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games would cement Birmingham's place as England's second city.[99]
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
