Santley v Wilde
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Santley v Wilde [1899] 2 Ch 474 is a decision of the English Court of Appeal in relation to the legal nature of a mortgage, and to what extent a provision in a mortgage may be struck down as a fetter or "clog" on the equity of redemption.[1][2][3][4][5]
Quick Facts Santley v Wilde, Court ...
Santley v Wilde | |
---|---|
Court | Court of Appeal |
Decided | 4 April 1899 |
Citation(s) | [1899] 2 Ch 474 68 LJ Ch 681 81 LT 393 48 WR 90 15 TLR 528 |
Case history | |
Appealed from | [1899] 1 Ch 747 |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Lindley MR Sir F.H. Jeune Romer LJ |
Keywords | |
|
Close
The court held on the facts that a provision giving the lender a share of the profits of the operations of the theatre company granting the mortgage was not repugnant to the equity of redemption, and was valid.