Reno v. Condon
2000 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Reno v. Condon?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. 141 (2000), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld the Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (DPPA) against a Tenth Amendment challenge.[1]
Quick Facts Reno v. Condon, Argued November 10, 1999 Decided January 12, 2000 ...
Reno v. Condon | |
---|---|
Argued November 10, 1999 Decided January 12, 2000 | |
Full case name | Reno v. Condon |
Citations | 528 U.S. 141 (more) 120 S. Ct. 666; 145 L. Ed. 2d 587; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 503 |
Case history | |
Prior | Summary judgment granted, 972 F. Supp. 977 (D.S.C. 1997); affirmed, 155 F.3d 453 (4th Cir. 1998); cert. granted, 526 U.S. 1111 (1999). |
Holding | |
The DPPA did not run afoul of the federalism principles enunciated in New York v. United States and Printz v. United States, and was a valid exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. X |
Close