![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/Blaeu_1652_-_Rotterdam.jpg/640px-Blaeu_1652_-_Rotterdam.jpg&w=640&q=50)
Pillans v Van Mierop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pillans & Rose v Van Mierop & Hopkins (1765) 3 Burr 1663 is a case concerning letters of credit, and the doctrine of consideration. It has been recommended as a landmark case in English contract law.[1] Lord Mansfield tentatively expressed a view that the doctrine of consideration was redundant. However, in Rann v Hughes the House of Lords doubted the presumption.[2]
Quick Facts Pillans v Van Mierop & Hopkins, Court ...
Pillans v Van Mierop & Hopkins | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | King's Bench |
Full case name | Pillans & Rose v Van Mierop & Hopkins |
Citation | (1765) 3 Burr 1663, 97 ER 1035 |
Case opinions | |
Lord Mansfield, Wilmot J, Yates J and Aston J |
Close