![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/SVouet.jpg/640px-SVouet.jpg&w=640&q=50)
Mara bar Serapion on Jesus
Ancient letter by a Stoic philosopher / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Mara bar Serapion on Jesus?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Mara bar Serapion was a Stoic philosopher from the Roman province of Syria. He is noted for a letter he wrote in Aramaic to his son, who was named Serapion.[1][2] The letter was composed sometime after 73 AD but before the 3rd century, and most scholars date it to shortly after 73 AD during the first century.[3] The letter may be an early non-Christian reference to the crucifixion of Jesus.[1][4]
![Thumb image](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/SVouet.jpg/640px-SVouet.jpg)
The letter refers to the unjust treatment of "three wise men": the murder of Socrates, the burning of Pythagoras, and the execution of "the wise king" of the Jews.[1][2] The author explains that in all three cases the wrongdoing resulted in the future punishment of those responsible by God and that when the wise are oppressed, not only does their wisdom triumph in the end, but God punishes their oppressors.[5]
The letter has been claimed to include no Christian themes[2][4] and many scholars consider Mara a pagan,[2][4][6][7] although some suggest he may have been a monotheist.[3] Some scholars see the reference to the execution of a "wise king" of the Jews as an early non-Christian reference to Jesus.[1][2][4] Criteria that support the non-Christian origin of the letter include the observation that "king of the Jews" was not a Christian title, and that the letter's premise that Jesus lives on in his teachings he enacted is in contrast to the Christian concept that Jesus continues to live through his resurrection.[4][5]
Scholars such as Robert Van Voorst see little doubt that the reference to the execution of the "king of the Jews" is about the death of Jesus.[5] Others such as Craig A. Evans see less value in the letter, given its uncertain date, and the ambiguity in the reference.[8]