MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
2005 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled unanimously that the defendants, peer-to-peer file sharing companies Grokster and Streamcast (maker of Morpheus), could be held liable for inducing copyright infringement by users of their file sharing software.[1] The plaintiffs were a consortium of 28 entertainment companies, led by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer studios.
Quick Facts MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Argued March 29, 2005 Decided June 27, 2005 ...
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. | |
---|---|
Argued March 29, 2005 Decided June 27, 2005 | |
Full case name | Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., et al. v. Grokster, Ltd., et al. |
Docket no. | 04-480 |
Citations | 545 U.S. 913 (more) 125 S. Ct. 2764; 162 L. Ed. 2d 781; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5212; 75 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1001; 33 Media L. Rep. 1865; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 547 |
Case history | |
Prior | Motion to dismiss denied, 243 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (C.D. Cal. 2003); summary judgment granted in part to defendants, 259 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (C.D. Cal. 2003); plaintiffs' motion to dismiss counterclaims granted in part, 269 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (C.D. Cal. 2003); affirmed, 380 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2004); cert. granted, 543 U.S. 1032 (2004). |
Subsequent | Remanded, 419 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 2005); summary judgment opinion on remand, 454 F. Supp. 2d 966 (C.D. Cal. 2006). |
Holding | |
Producers of technology who promote the ease of infringing on copyrights can be sued for inducing copyright infringement committed by their users. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Souter, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | Ginsburg, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy |
Concurrence | Breyer, joined by Stevens, O'Connor |
Laws applied | |
Copyright Act of 1976 |
Close