![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f8/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg/640px-Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg.png&w=640&q=50)
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
1997 Australian High Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation[1] is a High Court of Australia case that upheld the existence of an implied freedom of political communication in the Australian Constitution, but found that it did not necessarily provide a defence to a defamation action. The High Court extended the defence of qualified privilege to be compatible with the freedom of political communication.[2]
Quick Facts Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Court ...
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | High Court of Australia |
Full case name | David Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) |
Decided | 8 July 1997 |
Citations | [1997] HCA 25, (1997) 189 CLR 520 |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Brennan CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ |
Case opinions | |
(7:0) The Court decided to reconsider Theophanous and Stephens, and decided that those cases were incorrect. The Constitution does not confer personal rights as to the implied freedom of political communication |
Close