![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit.svg/640px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit.svg.png&w=640&q=50)
Jandreau v. Nicholson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jandreau vs. Nicholson[1][2] is a United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit case that dealt with competency of lay testimony as it pertains to establishing a diagnosis of a condition.
This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (January 2017) |
Quick Facts Jandreau vs. Nicholson, Court ...
Jandreau vs. Nicholson | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit |
Decided | July 3, 2007 |
Citation | 492 F.3d 1372 (2007) |
Case history | |
Appealed from | United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Bryson and Dyk |
Chief judge | Michel |
Close