International Insurance Co. v. Duryee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
International Insurance Co. v. Duryee, 96 F.3d 837 (6th Cir. 1996),[1] was a case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that held unconstitutional a statute enacted by the Ohio legislature that sought to discourage removal jurisdiction.[2]
Quick Facts International Insurance Co. v. Duryee, Court ...
International Insurance Co. v. Duryee | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit |
Full case name | International Insurance Company v. Harold T. Duryee, et al |
Argued | June 6, 1996 |
Decided | September 24, 1996 |
Citation(s) | 96 F.3d 837; 65 USLW 2231 |
Case history | |
Prior history | 55 F. Supp. 2d 799 (S.D. Ohio 1999) |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Gilbert S. Merritt Jr., R. Guy Cole Jr., Patrick J. Duggan (E.D. Mich.) |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Merritt, joined by a unanimous court |
Keywords | |
Removal jurisdiction |
Close