Herrera v. Wyoming
United States Supreme Court case regarding Indian hunting rights / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Herrera v. Wyoming?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Herrera v. Wyoming, No. 17-532, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Wyoming's statehood did not void the Crow Tribe's right to hunt on "unoccupied lands of the United States" under an 1868 treaty, and that the Bighorn National Forest did not automatically become "occupied" when the forest was created.[1][2]
Quick Facts Herrera v. Wyoming, Argued January 8, 2019 Decided May 20, 2019 ...
Herrera v. Wyoming | |
---|---|
Argued January 8, 2019 Decided May 20, 2019 | |
Full case name | Clayvin Herrera v. Wyoming |
Docket no. | 17-532 |
Citations | 587 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 1686; 203 L. Ed. 2d 846 |
Decision | Opinion |
Case history | |
Prior | Cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 2707 (2018). |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Gorsuch |
Dissent | Alito, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Ward v. Race Horse (1896) |
Close