Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc., 622 F. Supp. 2d 396 (N.D. Tex. 2009),[1] established precedent in the district that when a contract has a clause that authorizes one party to make changes to the "contract" without notification, that it is illusory and hence the entire "contract" is void.
Quick Facts Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc., Court ...
Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc. | |
---|---|
Court | United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Full case name | Cathryn Elaine Harris, et al. v. Blockbuster, Inc. |
Decided | April 15, 2009 |
Docket nos. | 3:09-cv-00217 |
Defendant(s) | Blockbuster, Inc. |
Plaintiff(s) | Cathryn Elaine Harris, et al. |
Citation(s) | 622 F. Supp. 2d 396 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Barbara M. Lynn |
Close