Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.
2016 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 579 U.S. 93 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the two-part Seagate test, used to determine when a district court may increase damages for patent infringement, is not consistent with Section 284 of the Patent Act.[1][2]
Quick Facts Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Argued February 23, 2016 Decided June 13, 2016 ...
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. | |
---|---|
Argued February 23, 2016 Decided June 13, 2016 | |
Full case name | Halo Electronics, Inc., Petitioner v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. |
Docket nos. | 14-1513 14-1520 |
Citations | 579 U.S. 93 (more) |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Case history | |
Prior | Affirmed, 769 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2014); cert. granted, 136 S.Ct. 356 (2015) |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Roberts, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | Breyer, joined by Kennedy, Alito |
Close