Garza v. Idaho
2019 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Garza v. Idaho?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 738 (2019), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the presumption of prejudice for Sixth Amendment purposes applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal.[1]
Quick Facts Garza v. Idaho, Argued October 30, 2018 Decided February 27, 2019 ...
Garza v. Idaho | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued October 30, 2018 Decided February 27, 2019 | |
Full case name | Gilberto Garza Jr., Petitioner, v. State of Idaho, Respondent. |
Docket no. | 17-1026 |
Citations | 586 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 738 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Holding | |
The presumption of prejudice as recognized in Roe v. Flores-Ortega applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Kavanaugh |
Dissent | Thomas, joined by Gorsuch; Alito (Parts I and II) |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. Amend. VI |
Close