Francesco Severi
Italian mathematician (1879–1961) / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Francesco Severi?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Francesco Severi (13 April 1879 – 8 December 1961) was an Italian mathematician. He was the chair of the committee on Fields Medal on 1936, at the first delivery.
Francesco Severi | |
---|---|
Born | 13 April 1879 (1879-04-13) Arezzo, Italy |
Died | 8 December 1961(1961-12-08) (aged 82) Rome, Italy |
Alma mater | Università di Torino, 1900 |
Known for | Algebraic geometry, several complex variables |
Awards | Gold medal of the Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta dei XL (1906) Prix Bordin (1907) (jointly with Federigo Enriques) Guccia Medal (1908) "Premio reale" of the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (1913) |
Scientific career | |
Fields | Mathematics |
Institutions | Università di Torino, Università di Bologna, Università di Padova, Università di Roma, Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (now Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica Francesco Severi) |
Doctoral advisor | Corrado Segre |
Other academic advisors | Enrico d'Ovidio, Federigo Enriques, Eugenio Bertini |
Doctoral students | Aldo Andreotti, Enzo Martinelli, Guido Zappa |
Other notable students | Luigi Fantappiè, Gaetano Fichera |
![Thumb image](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Severi.jpeg/320px-Severi.jpeg)
Severi was born in Arezzo, Italy. He is famous for his contributions to algebraic geometry and the theory of functions of several complex variables. He became the effective leader of the Italian school of algebraic geometry. Together with Federigo Enriques, he won the Bordin prize from the French Academy of Sciences.
He contributed in a major way to birational geometry, the theory of algebraic surfaces, in particular of the curves lying on them, the theory of moduli spaces and the theory of functions of several complex variables. He wrote prolifically, and some of his work (following the intuition-led approach of Federigo Enriques) has subsequently been shown to be not rigorous according to the then new standards set in particular by Oscar Zariski and André Weil. Although many of his arguments have since been made rigorous, a significant fraction were not only lacking in rigor but also wrong (in contrast to the work of Enriques, which though not rigorous was almost entirely correct). At the personal level, according to Roth (1963) he was easily offended, and he was involved in a number of controversies. Most notably, he was a staunch supporter of the Italian fascist regime of Benito Mussolini and was included on a committee of academics that was to conduct an anti-semitic purge of all scholarly societies and academic institutions.[1]