Draft:Stan LePard
American composer / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stanley James LePard (10 August 1956 - 11 February 2021[1][2]) was a musical artist and composer best known for his compositions in Microsoft Windows operating systems such as Windows 98 and Windows XP and in various video game franchises such as Halo.
Quick Facts Stan LePard, Born ...
Stan LePard | |
---|---|
Born | Stanley James LePard (1956-08-10)August 10, 1956 |
Died | February 11, 2021(2021-02-11) (aged 64) |
Cause of death | Brain hemorrage |
Known for | Creating "Velkommen" aka "title.wma" |
Website | https://stanlepardmusic.com/ |
Close
Submission declined on 26 November 2023 by Voorts (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 24 November 2023 by Ca (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Ca 7 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 25 May 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 13 months ago. | ![]() |
Comment: For a Wikipedia article about a person to be published, that person must be about a notable. A person is notable if there is significant coverage about that person in several independent, reliable sources. * Coverage of a person is significant if the person is covered in depth in the source; passing mentions and routine news stories are generally not significant.* A source is independent if it is not a person or organization associated with the article subject.* A source is generally considered to be reliable if it has some clear editorial standards, including fact checking.Only two sources meet the above here: the Cour d'Alene Press and NME. New Age Music Guide is a blog and does not appear to be reliable.Additionally, phrases like "passed away" and words like "iconic" should be removed. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Comment: YouTube, wikis, and IMDB are not reliable sources, espiecially for a biography. Ca talk to me! 15:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)