Comprehensive Technologies International, Inc. v. Software Artisans, Inc.
U.S. federal court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Comprehensive Technologies International, Inc. v. Software Artisans, Inc.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Comprehensive Technologies International, Inc. v. Software Artisans, Inc., 3 F.3d 730 (4th Cir. 1993) was a case in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit discussed legal tests for software copyright infringement, and ruled that trade secret misappropriation requires more than circumstantial evidence.[1] The case also ruled on what terms may be reasonable and enforceable in non-compete agreements.
Quick Facts Comprehensive Technologies International, Inc. v. Software Artisans, Inc., Court ...
Comprehensive Technologies International, Inc. v. Software Artisans, Inc. | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
Full case name | Comprehensive Technologies International, Incorporated v. Software Artisans, Incorporated, et al |
Argued | March 30, 1993 |
Decided | August 25, 1993 |
Citation(s) | 3 F.3d 730 |
Case history | |
Subsequent history | Opinion and judgment vacated and case dismissed on petition for rehearing, September 30, 1993. |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Kenneth Keller Hall, Francis Dominic Murnaghan Jr., Karen J. Williams |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Williams, joined by Hall |
Concur/dissent | Murnaghan |
Close