China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh
2018 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that upon denial of class certification, a putative class member may not, in lieu of promptly joining an existing suit or promptly filing an individual action, commence a class action anew beyond the time allowed by the applicable statute of limitations.[1]
Quick Facts China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, Argued March 26, 2018 Decided June 11, 2018 ...
China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh | |
---|---|
Argued March 26, 2018 Decided June 11, 2018 | |
Full case name | China Agritech, Inc. v. Michael H. Resh, et al. |
Docket no. | 17-432 |
Citations | 584 U.S. ___ (more) 138 S. Ct. 1800; 201 L. Ed. 2d 123 |
Case history | |
Prior | Resh v. China Agritech, Inc., No. 14-cv-05083, 2014 WL 12599849 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2014); reversed, 857 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2017); cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 543 (2017). |
Holding | |
Upon denial of class certification, a putative class member may not, in lieu of promptly joining an existing suit or promptly filing an individual action, commence a class action anew beyond the time allowed by the applicable statute of limitations. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch |
Concurrence | Sotomayor (in judgment) |
Close