Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
2021 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment constituted a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment.[1] Consequently, the regulation may not be enforced unless “just compensation” is provided to the employers.
Quick Facts Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, Argued March 22, 2021 Decided June 23, 2021 ...
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued March 22, 2021 Decided June 23, 2021 | |
Full case name | Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company, Inc. v. Victoria Hassid, et al. |
Docket no. | 20-107 |
Citations | 594 U.S. ___ (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Holding | |
The California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975, which grants labor organizations an uncompensated "right to take access" to an agricultural employer’s property in order to solicit support for unionization, effects a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Roberts, joined by Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett |
Concurrence | Kavanaugh |
Dissent | Breyer, joined by Sotomayor, Kagan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. V |
Close